Ice Cream Ban Comes to Parsippany Schools
The government-mandated move may affect local PTA fundraising efforts.
Another food-related controversy has come to the Parsippany school district, and this one may leave local kids screaming for ice cream.
Hard on the heels of the ongoing Parsippany Hills High School protest against the new federally-mandated lunch program comes another dictate from the government: no ice cream may be sold in schools during the school day.
The news is a blow for local Parent-Teacher Association groups, which traditionally offer ice cream for sale during lunch periods to raise funds for their organizational efforts.
UPDATE: One member says Parsippany PTAs could lose as much as $20,000 due to the ice cream ban.
Superintendent of Schools LeRoy Seitz said the district has no choice but comply with state law.
"7CFR 210.11 and NJAC 2:36-1:10 make it very clear that any type of food sale fundraising done by our PTAs or any other school organization cannot be conducted during the hours when our school nutrition program is in operation," he said. "Our recent directive to our building principals simply directed them to make sure we are in full compliance with these regulations for 2012-2013.
"While we fully understand that our students enjoyed the PTA ice cream fundraisers in the past and that the ice cream sale fundraiser was very successful for our PTAs, we cannot approve activities, including PTA ice cream sales that are in violation of state regulations."
Seitz said he asked principals to investigate other opportunities where ice cream could be sold outside of the school lunch program hours.
"We are also looking into whether our local recreational programs might be able to purchase the ice cream that many of our PTAs have already purchased in anticipation of conducting ice cream fundraisers during the 2012-2013 school year," he said.
The superintendent said that like area PTA members and students, he isn't happy about the news.
"It is unfortunate that we cannot permit the PTA ice cream sales during the hours that lunch is being served," he said.
d-dubbs
3:47 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Whats next now? Is the Government going to limit how many times a student can go to the restroom? Or even what times they are allowed to go?!
Me
2:57 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Funny you should say that, my daughter (8th grade) got in school suspension for getting up and walking out after getting her period through her pants. She begged 3 times to go to the restroom and the teacher told her no, so she got up and left. Russell County Alabama...Thank God we are a military family, and are OUT of ALABAMA.
Angel Eyes
4:05 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
All the schools should set up a small room as a store and sell the ice cream from there... According to the statute a school store is fine... Can anyone tell me what this statute is good for?
PeoplesChamp
4:13 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
OMG! students can't eat ice cream every day for lunch?! what a tragedy that one of the most unhealthy foodstuffs in America won't be in the lunchroom every day. Pay no attention to the Joint Chiefs' report about obesity threatening our military readiness... Maybe the PTA should sell something healthier or something unrelated to food?
MorrisMom
11:17 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
OMG! Maybe get your facts straight....the PTAs sell ice cream once a week - NOT daily! I think even the staunchest nutritionist would agree that "everything in moderation" is OK. As for the Joint Chief's report about obesity threating military readiness...I could be wrong, but I don't think there are many elementary school children entering military these days? Hmmmm....
Angelina
11:14 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
actually, it's been stated that a small amount of ice cream is good for digestion after a meal. Not all kids are obese bc their parents know when to say no. so it's not fair to take it away from everyone if the obese students are the issue. Tell their parents to say "no honey, you cant have mcdonalds for dinner everyday and please put that bag of chips down."
Barbara Silvestri
2:03 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Doesn't matter weather you feel it is healthy or not. Our law making politicians should not be spending time, money or even ink mandating what people should eat or when.
John Jay
8:47 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Maybe you should mind your own business as to what other people eat and worry about yourself. I don't need anyone from the government telling me what I can and cannot eat.
As far as military readiness goes -- spare me. Have you ever eaten lunch at the Pentagon? I have -- there's more CRAP there then at a dog pound.
Prior to going into the service, we were SPECIFICALLY TOLD to ensure we that we get into shape if we wanted to get through basic training easier. Guess what? I didn't need some nanny telling me what to eat and when to exercise -- it was my FREE WILL, not some bloated pencil pusher from a Board of Education.
Michael Brancato
4:39 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
It should be noted that this is a state regulation, before all the Obama haters come out and blame him.
Richard
8:07 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Wrongo Michael. The CFR in the cite 7CFR 210.11 mentioned by Supt. Seitz stands for Code of FEDERAL Regulation. This certainly is the result of an Executive Order from the White House (notice how many times he uses executive orders to circumvent the debate process the legislative branch (that is Congress) is designed to engage-in in representing the PEOPLE). Obama does not want there to be discussion among elected representatives. They just get in the way of his goals, so he ignores them and uses the executive order side step.
Todd M. Finchler
10:25 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Please see Federal Regulation below. Adopted during Reagan in 1988 and amended during Clinton in 1994. As per Lexis/Nexis, reg has not been amended since 1994.
Richard
11:10 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
So, if the law has been in place for the past 18 years, what has changed? The Obama administrations application (or perhaps misapplication) of the regulations. Any way you slice it, it comes back to the White House.
Michael Brancato
12:51 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
The key is in NJAC 2:36-1:10, which implements Federal guidelines outlined in 2006, long before Obama was even a factor in the discussion. Even Dr. Seitz pointed out that it's a state regulation. Read the article, and stick to the facts.
Richard
1:26 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Michael, the facts are the CFR came first. The only reason NJAC (New Jersey Administrative Code) (more regulations) is involved is due to the CFR. You see, the Fed govt cannot impose mandates on states. What they do is say "if you conform to these guidelines, we will send you a boat load of $money$". What state official - in their right mind - is going to turn down a boat load of $money$. So, NJ crafts state regulations to conform to the Fed govt regulations to get the $. So it did originate at the Fed level. So we are back to the question, if this law is 18 years olfd, what has caused the changes to be implemented in the last 2 years? Answer, Obama!
Nan Hahn
3:28 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Richard, you need to reread the article - it CLEARLY states that this is a STATE regulation. What is it with some of you people (?) - always ready to blame our President! Get a clue!
Richard
3:56 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Nan, look at the second paragraph of the article. It states "new FEDERALLY mandated lunch program".
Andy
4:53 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
The PTA's do not sell Ice Cream on a daily basis. Most sell it once a week and the proceeds from the sale go back to the school. There are nutritional standards that must be met in order for the Ice Cream to be sold in the school that have been established by the U.S.D.A. As it stands, the PTA in the entire district will loose a great amount of money if this ban remains in effect. With this new ban in effect, I can only imagine what will be next. Will the school board start checking lunch boxes making sure that parents did not pack to many Twinkies or Yodels in the lunch box. If parents do not want their kids to have ice cream, do not send them to school with money.. Problem solved.. However, for most of the kids, it is a special treat to be served ice cream in school and the kids enjoy it. Hopefully this is just an oversight and the rulling will be reversed...
clyde donovan
5:13 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
You cannot have ice cream in the mentally deranged world of Fuhrer Obama.
Jeff
7:03 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
I really get tired of your Hitler comparisons. They are completely inappropriate. If you notice as Mike pointed out - this is a state statute.
clyde donovan
9:38 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Hey Jeff, my opinion is absolutely not inappropriate. My opinion differs from your opinion and you don't like any opinion that isn't identical to yours. Again, I repeat, Obama is a fascist.
PeoplesChamp
9:59 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
You're entitled to have your opinion, as sick and deranged as it is. I'd feel sorry for you but then I'd actually waste my time feeling something for you.
Richard
8:10 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Hey Jeff, Mike is wrong. He did not do his homework. No state statute cited by anyone.
Todd M. Finchler
9:31 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
The federal regulation was adopted in 1988 (Reagan) and modified in 1994 (Clinton). See full reg below - two parts due to length.
210.11 - Competitive food services.
(a) Definitions. For the purpose of this section:
(1) Competitive foods means any foods sold in competition with the Program to children in food service areas during the lunch periods.
(2) Food of minimal nutritional value means: (i) In the case of artificially sweetened foods, a food which provides less than five percent of the Reference Daily Intakes (RDI) for each of eight specified nutrients per serving; and (ii) in the case of all other foods, a food which provides less than five percent of the RDI for each of eight specified nutrients per 100 calories and less than five percent of the RDI for each of eight specified nutrients per serving. The eight nutrients to be assessed for this purpose are?protein, vitamin A, vitamin C, niacin, riboflavin, thiamine, calcium, and iron. All categories of food of minimal nutritional value and petitioning requirements for changing the categories are listed in appendix B of this part.
Todd M. Finchler
9:31 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
(b) General. State agencies and school food authorities shall establish such rules or regulations as are necessary to control the sale of foods in competition with lunches served under the Program. Such rules or regulations shall prohibit the sale of foods of minimal nutritional value, as listed in appendix B of this part, in the food service areas during the lunch periods. The sale of other competitive foods may, at the discretion of the State agency and school food authority, be allowed in the food service area during the lunch period only if all income from the sale of such foods accrues to the benefit of the nonprofit school food service or the school or student organizations approved by the school. State agencies and school food authorities may impose additional restrictions on the sale of and income from all foods sold at any time throughout schools participating in the Program.
[53 FR 29147, Aug. 2, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 23614, May 6, 1994]
Eliot W. Collins
1:08 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies - "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."
Some say that if ice cream is banned then the next thing you know our country will be Communist.
VietNam Vet
12:54 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
You got it Clyde, just another example of more government intervention here. When do we get a brain in this world and put a stop to the idiocy going on in this country today, all since Odummer got in. We can only hope we have seen the last of this moronic muslim freak. If he gets back in, expect more of the government telling you what you can do in your life.
I would just go out and get some ice cream anyway, what are they going to do expell the entire school for eating ice cream?
bc
6:08 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Learn your governmental structure: it's the congress you should be blaming, not the president.
Bill Mcgirth
6:54 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
I love how Seitz need to explain to Patch "that the district has no choice but comply with state law." Now he has no choice?!? Why didn't he feel compelled to comply when his contract was in dispute...another rotten politician.
VietNam Vet
2:25 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Bill, I so agree with you, but Speitz chose to go another way and try to get around it illegally as always I suppose?
Utoh, you are also right, this idiot is offended by Fat People and wants everybody to be thin, so the whole world has to do what she wants now. Yeah right!!! When do we put a stop to these idiots and losing our rights? I would show up eating Ice Cream and if they didn't like it, expell me.... I don't think they will expell the entire school for following your constitutional rights. If the Gov. doesn't like it, thats to bad!!!
Todd M. Finchler
9:00 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
New Jersey Administrative Code § 2:36-1.11 Competitive food policy
(a) The competitive food policy prohibits certain snack and beverage items by regulations promulgated by the USDA for the administration of child nutrition programs and as contained in the New Jersey School Nutrition/Wellness Policy. The following items shall not be served, sold or given away as a free promotion anywhere on school property at any time before the end of the school day, including items served in the reimbursable After School Snack Program:
1. Foods of minimal nutritional value as defined by USDA regulations;
2. All food and beverage items listing sugar, in any form, as the first ingredient (beginning September 1, 2007); and
3. All forms of candy (beginning September 1, 2007).
By the way, Hitler was responsible for the murder of 10 million people. I, too, am offended when people make Hitler references. Feel free to dislike our President, but please do so without invoking Hitler.
clyde donovan
9:53 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Obama is a dangerous malignant narcissist just like Adolph Hitler - and other similarly self-obsessed political maniacs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/04/weekinreview/the-world-stalin-to-saddam-so-much-for-the-madman-theory.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
Par4theCourse
11:37 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Todd,
Thanks for posting the regs. So if I read number one correctly, when its my child's birthday, its illegal for the kid to pass out tootsie rolls to celebrate his/her special day.
We are broken beyond repair.
Selene
11:17 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Clyde, get a life......
VietNam Vet
2:26 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Selene, you democraps need to get in touch with reality here and get a life.
Ken Nolan
6:38 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Really, ironic our FAT BULLYING governor put this into law!! Really!!!
PeterB
3:00 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Hey Ken - What are part of Federal don't you get?! Not coming from Trenton, coming for DC.
Robert S.Briant
5:47 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Ken Nolan can you read the Law was put on the Books in 1994 be for our Governor was even Elected. so stop and Think.
Ken Nolan
6:40 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
What nex the police will be chasing ice cream trucks from staying by the schools
Barbara Silvestri
2:10 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
w/in 200 ft of a school zone. Could happen.
VietNam Vet
2:27 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Its time for the Ice Cream companies to sue the gov. for trying to put them out of business.
lynn magnusson
6:55 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Hopefully this will inspire more creative fund raising efforts. Fasiciously..., Perhaps the sale of birth-control, rolling papers, or Victoria secret clothing would prove lucrative & pass government rules tests.
Laura Grenard
6:56 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
I think any parent that has the time should head on over to McDonalds and buy a Sundae and bring it to their child at lunch today.
ANGELA
7:13 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Try frozen yogurt
Kenny
10:44 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
See that is the point why should we try frozen yogurt what if my child want ice cream he can't have after he eats his lunch in school because the goverment says so . so no freedom of choice for you as a parent or him as a child.
Richard
11:03 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Kenny - you want FREEDOM!?! Your freedoms are being taken away left and right by Washington!
Monica Sclafani
7:49 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
This really does put a damper on what the PTA's will be able to do for the kids at the elementary level. If you went to Back-to-School night, many of you were asked to vote on your PTA's budget. Ice cream sales can bring in two to three thousand dollars per school year, which in turn helps pay for cultural arts programs and field trips that parents pay little or nothing for.
VietNam Vet
12:58 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Gee, Monica I guess your going to have to spend somemore of your precious money to take care of your own kids, instead of the taxpayers in this case. Keep voting for these democrap morons and these crooked politicians like seitz and calabria, maybe they'll come to your rescue. Why not you think they are so wonderful?
g
10:21 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
American First Lady and anti-obesity advocate Michelle Obama splurged on not only a burger and fries on Monday but washed it all down with a chocolate shake.
While the media is lambasting her fat-laden luncheon, nutritionists beg to differ, noting that an occasional 'pig-out' is part of a healthy lifestyle.
VietNam Vet
1:02 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Its a case of do as I say, don't do as I do. If they vote this jerk back in, they'll get more of the government telling them what to do. Pretty soon they'll telling you when to get up and when to go to sleep and how much money you can make and you'll be working for the government, like Russia.
Angela
10:38 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Whether it is Federal, State, or Local Government mandated, another piece of childhood innocence is being taken away. How sad that an elementary school child can't look forward to buying something as simple as an ice cream bar once a week. This was always optional - if you did not want your child to have ice cream, you didn't send them with any money to purchase same....simple...a parent had the right to choose what was best for their child's dietary needs! Instead of obsessing over ice cream and the like, how about the “Government” steps in to remove all the contaminated items being sold to our nation from places like China….these items pose a real health threat to our children and pets not a simple ice cream. As a former PTA President, back when my sons were in school, we were able to raise money for new playground equipment. Children were able to "work off" that once-a-week ice cream bar on updated, beautiful equipment the revenue from PTA supported fundraisers provided. We are being led around like cattle to slaughter!
Natalie Davis
7:55 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
That was my thought when I heard that bringing cupcakes to school suddenly was verboten. I am just glad my kids got to experience that on their in-school birthdays. Made them feel great and made their classmates happy.
Robert S.Briant
11:52 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
We should all Start writing the our beloved people that are running our government. That they are not to Go to Berger King (or) McDonald's because if they do it might give them so common sense, there are bigger problem then going after the Lunch & Ice cream in the schools, but I do not thing they would ever get common sense and they are sure not showing that right now .
Lorlhy@aol.com
12:25 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Thank God for our Governor that he has already had his childhood. The HORROR!!!!
seriously, enough already.
CONCETTA BARNISH
1:19 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
enough is enough the goverment has there nose in everything
now ice cream what next? If the goverment doen't change soon they will be telling everyone what we can and can't do in our home. we need a CHANGE and i mean Big time.soon.
Nan Hahn
3:36 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Mitt and Paul plan to tell you what you're allowed to do in your bedroom - and with whom. Is THAT the change you want?
VietNam Vet
1:08 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Sorry, about the loss of your mind Nan, but its Odummer who is trying to control your life. If he gets back in I hope you can say " I Love Islamic Law" because thats what your going to get. This muslim jerk will take everything he can, and with every vote, you are giving him more control over your life. So go ahead and keep voting for a would-be-dictator.
Kenneth Kaplan
1:24 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
End this kind of federal government intrusion. Vote for the Libertarians: Gary Johnson for Presidnet and Ken Kaplan for Senate (me), and restore decisions like this to local control.
Analli Citall
3:09 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Does anyone know (Natalie?) if this is only true for Parsippany schools? If this is a law that is based on federal or state law I would think there would be a lot more uproar about this issue. Though when I search for other articles all of them reference this one article and one school district.
Is it possible that Dr. Seitz misunderstands the law and a ban of ice cream sales by the PTA is not necessary? Or is Dr. Seitz the only superintendent that does understand the law and EVERYONE else is going to have to change as well?
Richard
4:01 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
These restrictions are being imposed nationwide as it is a Federal regulation. I have talked to parents in other Morris County towns and the same thing is happening in their schools. Also see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IB7NDUSBOo . This was put together by a school in the midwest. It's a real problem!
Richard
4:18 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Also, google "federal school lunch mandates" and you will get pages of articles.
Natalie Davis
7:57 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
I plan to check that when I am back on the clock; this was a busy day from start to finish... There is a story up, however, that argues that ice cream sales can be justified under the law as it currently stands. Questions regarding that are in front of the superintendent, so we'll have to see what happens.
http://parsippany.patch.com/articles/par-troy-pta-dad-says-law-may-permit-in-school-ice-cream-sales
Nan Hahn
3:48 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
I graduated from HPHS - '64. In those days, it was a regional high school and Parsippany was one of the towns covered. Most days my lunch consisted of two tuna sandwiches, milk and an ice cream bar. They made the best tuna fish sandwiches around and lunch cost me a great big $0.53!!! And I was skinny as a rail! The reason? Because we were physically active and burned off the calories. Today, kids laze around the house watching TV, surfing the web, and playing video games. Get those kids out on the field playing softball, baseball, football, hockey, soccer, running track - THAT will take care of obesity!
tsa la gi
4:14 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
ok so that means that the push of the crap that the schools make our kids sell is no longer allowed too then, if they say you cant sell ice cream durning school hrs then dont ask us to sell the xmas cards and paper that you push on our kids to do after hrs!
LAP
4:23 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
I am sorry but they need to stop changing all these rules. soon you won't be able to go out your house without permission. Sorry but this is crazy. I know i am overweight because as a kid i was declined stuff that i enjoyed to eat and now because of that I try to eat it all the time as i missed out of it a kid. but now that I am an adult with a family and don't got time to go for a gym and all to loose the weight instead it just stays their. as a kid I was as skinny as can be as i was not able to enjoy the stuff that you where suppose to enjoy. I was rarely giving junk food and at Halloween i was able to pick out a few pieces of candy and rest was giving away or tossed.
stan stein
4:23 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
This is SO not along the lines of good governence......THIS thing is without any solution.....low fat splenda sweetened ice cream, would fit the guideline, if the guideline3 was written like an actual guideline....
But besides that.....Obama has inflicted an atriocity on today's youth, AND you and I.....he appointed the attorney for Monsanto to the FDA....and possibly the USDA.....so they can railroad ANYONE in the way of GMO foods.....now that there are conclusive tests that prove GMO products have a list of affects a page long, he basically signed our illness certificate.....even random doctors are starting to spaek out....and they have traditionally pushed medicine with side effects in colusion with drug companies.......this is serious....prop 37 needs to be passed, the h.ll with ice cream
LBC
6:32 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
I have been a family practioner for 15 years. Over the past three years I have had to learn to treat obese elementary school children for hypertension and diabetes. All of these problems, in this age group, are caused by diet and inadequate physical activity. Just encouraging parents and children to decrease the junk food intake, has not been effective.
stan stein
4:25 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
I meant frozen yogourt
Natalie Davis
8:01 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
The more I hear, and this is off the point of nutrition and school lunch and ice cream, it seems the promotion of exercise is a good thing, and I hope everyone can appreciate the federal Let's Move initiative, which seeks to do just that. But even without that, what's stopping us from starting walking or running groups to give people an opportunity to get a little fitter and socialize at the same time... Would anyone be interested in such a thing?
Jed
8:52 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
WHAT ARE SCHOOLS SUPPOSED TO DO???? the government cuts their funding, now they are taking away yet another way schools can help shrink the financial gap... I am at a loss. I can't imagine what schools can do. then parents get upset when schools have to close down due to lack of funding... teacher get laid off... class sized get larger... students get less 1 on 1 attention... that in turn makes their grades go down... which then gives the government a reason to give them less money if they aren't holding up their end of the deal by teaching the kids well... it is a joke.
mike
9:04 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Why does this surprise anyone? for the past 40 yrs parents have blindly and meekly turned over more and more responsibility for raising their kids to the schools,first it was lunches, then free lunches, then breakfast, now afterschool programs and summer meals, They got what they wanted almost entire control of your kids GAVE IT TO THEM
utoh
11:19 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Children are being ripped from good, caring and loving parents and families all over this country, parental rights are ignored. You are so right. You can turn a blind eye to ice cream or what ever bogus interfering law, but when they come for your kids you might think differently.
Selene
11:48 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
What is sad is the morons who abide by these stupid regulations. Grow a set and say NO we are serving ice cream on Tuesday. Will the police come and arrest you? I doubt that.
VietNam Vet
1:54 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Salene, when are you ever going to learn that this has come down from your stupid idol in washington, because she doesn't like fat people and another way of controling your life. Get real and see for a change what this idiot is doing to our lives. What's next, you can't go on vacations because he doesn't think its good to waste your money, that way you give him more to spend. Get real lady, are you totally stupid or what?
Harriet Knevals
8:52 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Wow...so much posting about ice cream. Few ever mention other causes for childhood obesity. Children with a lineman sized dad could inherit his physical size. Undiagnosed thyroid disfunction also causes obesity. Having a child leave the lunch table hungry usually leads to overeating after school.
Kenny
10:31 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Gee I think it is so funny everyone blames the schools the restaurant for carrying unhealthy foods and so on, when I was a kid I ate all those foods and was still thin
Reason my mom didn't let me sit in the house all day and watch TV she would always say go out and play with your friends. the problem here is the new generation of kids don't go out and play they sit in the house play video games and eat and maybe nobody heard but as healthy as some of those foods maybe if your kids are not active and do nothing but play video games all day they will gain weight no matter what . either way it’s not always the food it the fact they are inactive, send them outside to play get rid of those video games or tell them you have x time period to play and then send them outside to play with friends don’t let them sit in the house all day.
HealthyKids
7:02 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Everyone that is against the gov banning unhealthy foods for our kids I have a question for you. Are you for or against legalization of marijuana? I hope you are for it. I also hope you go down to Washington and complain because guess what more people die from obesity every year than marijuana use. There has NEVER been one recorded death from marijuana use. If you believe this is not true FIND just one article ever proving me wrong. Blame that on Regan and his war on drugs. And if your defense is that marijuana is a gateway drug and leads to harsher drugs than we should ban aspirin since this is a pain killer and we all know opiet (pain killer) drug abuse is really destroying our kids.
gina s.
7:54 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
My 13 year old had a better take on it all and it's so true....why take away voluntary ice cream once a week when the schools only have gym for 30 minutes twice a week. Why isn't gym every day? He's so right too.
Rosetta
7:58 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Selling ice cream ince a week is not going to hurt any child....and it is once a week because I work at one of the elementary schools. And like someone said...don't give the dollar to your child. And any older kids who have tbeir own money will buy what they want outside of school anyway
Rickyrab
6:30 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
hello?
Rickyrab
6:33 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Blaming certain presidents and governors for a dumb law? Yup, political silly season is in full swing.
As for ice cream, why not fortify it and use other sweeteners instead of sugar? No reason for this law to translate into an ice cream ban.
Natalie Davis
11:26 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
I recommend reading the latest story on the controversy, which points to state law being the primary culprit here, and it is less about nutrition than about where the money goes: http://parsippany.patch.com/articles/schools-chief-ice-cream-sale-ban-will-continue-for-now
John Jay
8:40 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Please show me where in the U.S. Constitution where the federal government has the authority to order local schools to: A) Feed children and B) Dictate what children can eat.
What's next? If a kid brings ice cream to school, will they be punished with suspension?
I would like to see what kind of garbage is in the lunch room for the teachers and staff of the schools. I am sure if the teachers and staff were subjected to this idiotic treatment, they would have the unions call a strike.
The parents need to call their bluff: Every parent should send the children to school with a home made lunch with ice cream. Boycott the cafeteria's so that they are forced to throw out one ton of food -- then you will see the dirt bags in government change because it will cut into their government subsidies!
g
2:55 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Socialists are Statist, they are absolutely authoritarian in their philosophy. Their long-term goal has always been a Socialistic Dictatorship with full-imposition of a very legalistic society where the individual is simply a part of the collective.
The State must step in to save the country and protect the people from the dangers associated with the inherent problems of free enterprise. Today, the call is very similar, the State must step in to protect the people.
The State will protect you: NO MORE ICE CREAM
No more free will. George Bernard Shaw speaking of the Socialist Utopia, he said: "Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not.
Analli Citall
3:05 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I love the way people just bend this story to fit their own reality.
If people do not want the government to tell them how to educate their children, what they can sell in the cafeterias, how many calories should be in the maximum meal there is a very simple answer.... STOP TAKING FEDERAL DOLLARS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. The only reason we have to listen to their rules is because we take their money. Just stop taking the money and you can make what ever decisions you want.
None of you want that though. You just want to sit here with your hand out TAKING federal dollars and then bitching that they want you to spend them a particular way. You state they are trying to control you. Well, break free. Say NO MORE. We can do this with out your help, thank you very much.
Keep your kids home and home school them, send them to a private school. Those are both options too. The problems may still exist in the public schools but they won't affect you.
g
10:55 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Analli Citall, Where does the government get the federal dollars which you say," ...the with your hand out TAKING federal dollars and then bitching that they want you to spend them a particular way."
"You state they are trying to control you" The State must step in to save the country and protect the people from the dangers associated with the inherent problems of free enterprise. Today, the call is very similar, the State must step in to protect the people.
The State will protect you: NO MORE ICE CREAM
VietNam Vet
8:26 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
What you don't seem to get g, is this is coming down from the FEDS, because Odummer's ugly half doesn't like fat people and she wants to see all kids on a diet and no more sweets.
Natalie Davis
9:16 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Mr. Vet, this is coming down from the state. Ice cream can fit federal nutritional guidelines, as PTAs and Superintendent Seitz and reading the law will tell you. What's stopping the PTA sales is the state law saying PTAs specifically cannot sell food items during school breakfast and lunch hours. You may be right or wrong about the merits of lack thereof of the POTUS and FLOTUS and feds, but this is not about them. It's about state law.