patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Dismiss Out-of-Town Students—Now, New BOE Member Says

Reorganization meeting sparks arguments over several issues.

 

Susy Golderer took the reins as president of the Parsippany-Troy Hills Board of Education Thursday night at the annual school board reorganization meeting. Her election, and that of Sharif Shamsudin as vice president, was the easiest part of a meeting that lasted more than four hours.

The night started with the swearings-in of newly elected board members Frank Calabria, who was last year's president, and newcomer James Carifi, a Parsippany Police captain. As was announced at the Dec. 23 school board meeting, Joanne Mancuso, the third candidate elected Nov. 6, did not attend and will not take the seat.

New Business Administrator Robin Tedesco administered the oath of office to Calabria and Carifi and had them sign documents certifying them as duly elected and sworn Board of Education members. She handed the men their "board packets," envelopes containing documents pertaining to board business, and they sat down at the dais.

The next item of business was the election of a president and vice president. 

Shamsudin nominated Golderer, his 2011 BOE election running mate. Martin, the third member of their slate, seconded.

Calabria nominated longtime board member Fran Orthwein, praising her experience, knowledge and commitment.

"Over the next three to five years, we are going to have to deal with changes and situations like we've never seen before," he said. "We need someone who is experienced and knowledgeable  to lead through the challenges."

The vote broke down along factional lines: Michael Strumolo, Shamsudin, Martin, Golderer and Carifi chose Golderer. Calabria, Anthony Mancuso and Orthwein selected Orthwein.

The new president took the chair and offered her thanks.

"I am personally very humbled by this process and for the confidence that not only my running mates but other members of this board have shown by nominating or voting for me," Golderer said. "I am a very fair person, I don't take sides. I like to look at both sides of any issue that comes up. I do not plan on changing who I am. I hope that will show and that the community will have confidence."

The floor was opened for nominations for vice president.

Martin nominated Shamsudin, and Calabria reiterated his plea for consideration of Orthwein's experience. Again, the board's two apparent factions voted for their own candidate and Shamsudin was named the victor.

During a break after the vote, Carifi told Patch that he was so far unimpressed with his experience.

"I was disappointed in the swearing-in," he said. "They had both of us up there at the same time. I couldn't have my family with me. It didn't have any structure. I'm the kind of person who likes structure. Same with the meeting. This board needs structure."

Asked what he plans to focus on as a new board member, Carifi said he would target the issues upon which he had campaigned.

"I am concerned about the children of teachers who don't live in Parsippany getting to go to school here," he said. "It's a burden to the taxpayers and I intend to do something about it tonight."

But first, Michael Strumolo asked Carifi whether he had been given an opportunity to preview his board packet prior to being sworn; the police captain indicated that he hadn't.

Strumolo then made a motion to table consideration of the superintendent's and secretary's reports until the next BOE business meeting.

"It's unfair that a new board member wasn't allowed to prepare before being expected to vote," he explained.

Some in the audience complained, noting that meeting documents are available on the district website prior to meetings.

"Let him read it online like we do," said Parsippany Hills High School PTA President Sandy Nussbaum Giercyk.

Martin said he agreed with tabling, but not because of Carifi's preparation or lack thereof. His issue was Joanne Mancuso's vacant seat.

"We must vote as a quorum of nine," he said.

Orthwein took her colleague to task.

"Robert's Rules of Order defines a quorum of five, and this board needs to get to work," she insisted. "We are a quorum, we are eight members."

She also sided with the residents.

"Mr. Carifi had the same opportunity as any other citizen to look up the reports," said Orthwein. "I see no reason why we should even consider tabling the reports and bringing the business of the district to a screeching halt."

"It says on here that these are confidential and for board members only," Carifi fired back.

Strumolo and Orthwein went back and forth parsing language of the policy governing reorganization procedures.

Board Attorney Mark Tabakin said state statute mandates that reorganization take place within the first seven days of the new year. He pointed out that this was the first January reorganization. Until last year, BOE elections were held in April, so new members began work with decisions for a new school year. That is not the case in 2013, which follows the first November board election.

"Most of what's in the [superintendent's and secretary's reports] has already been adopted by the board," he explained, noting that decisions through June 30 are already made. "Virtually all these actions can be tabled. ... You may table everything if that's the will of the board.

"Nothing is going to come to a screeching halt."

Calabria asked whether new members-elect should receive all the information sworn members receive.

"We have an individual who was [elected, but] not sworn in tonight. Should she have received the information?"

After more debate, Strumolo amended his motion to table instead only the secretary's report. No one seconded.

"That means the original motion stands," said Tabakin.

"Tabling would violate the bylaws," Orthwein argued. "It uses the word 'shall.'"

"Bylaws can be changed," said the attorney.

"We have bylaws to guide our actions," Orthwein insisted. 

"If it's the will of the board to delay, adjourn or put off a matter, you have the right to do it," Tabakin countered. "Tabling does not stop the operation of this district."

The debate continued on for nearly an hour on the matter of the reports. In the end, the board voted to pass Strumolo's motion to table both the superintendent's and secretary's reports.  Orthwein was the lone no vote.

Then Carifi was given the opportunity to discuss a piece of new business.

"Eleven students in Parsippany schools aren't Parsippany residents," he said. "I move tonight that we stop this practice immediately." 

Carifi was referring to the children of Parsippany school teachers who live in other towns. In the past, teachers were free to have their own children attend district schools, but it was ended several years ago with some children grandfathered in so that they could continue their educations here.

There are 11 of those students left.

Interim Personnel Director Paul Saxton, filling in for an ailing Superintendent of Schools LeRoy Seitz, suggested having the board's policy committee research the matter.

"I'm looking to end this immediately, tonight," Carifi reiterated.

"You can't do that," said Golderer. "There is a procedure..."

"Policy could be suspended," Tabakin interjected, "but that would have to be a separate motion."

The debate continued on until Carifi amended his motion. Rather than forcing kids out of school in the morning, he said he would move for children of staff and faculty to have until the end of the month.

"They would be out by Feb. 1," he said. "Or their parents can pay tuition."

Martin seconded.

"For 11 children out of 7,300," said Orthwein, now visibly angry, but controlled. "I don't like the idea of disenfranchising children in the middle of the school year. I don't think that's the right thing to do for children."

"I gotta agree with Fran," said Anthony Mancuso. "We're talking about 11 employees, their students, their children, in the middle of a school year. To do that to our employees and to the children... it doesn't get us anything."

Shamsudin agreed with the call to send the matter to the policy committee.

Attorney Tabakin entered the debate.

"You're no longer suspending, you're amending," he said. "That exposes this to challenge."

Golderer said as president, she wants the matter to go to the policy committee. She invited Carifi to attend the panel's next meeting.

The new board member also complained that 45-55 students did not have the documentation needed to register in Par-Troy schools. As it stands, these children must prove residence using other methods, working with Joan Benos, the superintendent's assistant . Carifi suggested that Benos match these students' addresses against the town's zoning map and report any suspicious cases directly to Parsippany's housing division.

"That's what we have committees for," said Golderer. "I recommend we remand this to the critical issues committee. It is something we should address as a board with respect to making sure we educate children living in our district." 

Carifi then suggested creating a weekend leadership academy for students. The program, he said, would be similar to the  Citizens Police Academy that he facilitated for the PPD until the end of 2010.     

Golderer remanded the leadership academy idea to the critical issues committee for study and review. 

Later in the meeting, resident after resident—some educators, some parents—stood to chastise the board and anyone who would support Carifi's idea.

"I am concerned and disheartened by some of the behavior I saw tonight," said PTA representative Sandy Giercyk, who called for compassion. "Throw their kids out of school? What are we saying about our staff and our children? I am disgusted. I am embarrassed to say these are people I elected."

A large part of the audience applauded.

"I'm shocked and saddened by what I saw here tonight," said resident Beth Bluj.

And resident George Blair offered a lecture.

"The first time I came to a board meeting, I came out of love for my daughter," he said, and then addressed Orthwein directly. "Fran, whatever you do, do it for your love of the kids. That's what you've said."

Orthwein nodded, and Blair addressed the rest of the board.

"I watched you tonight and feel like I'm back three years ago when you were in disarray," he said, referring to BOE battles of old. "If you're a new board, you need to find somebody to teach you to work as a team. If you don't work together and you have behavior like you had tonight... I see no enthusiasm from anyone. You have no concept of what a team is about."

Then he barked some advice at the board.

"Work together, sit up," said a frowning Blair. "And some of you, smile!"

Related Topics: Board of Education, Education, Government, School Board, and Schools

Scott Dean

7:35 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

It may be too early for some, to me it is refreshing to have an elect hit the ground running with his campaign promises.I think Parsippany residents have been lulled to many times by cheap talk. Actions speak louder than words.
Thank you Mr.Cariffi

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joan Callamezzo

11:15 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Mr. Dean,

I assume you were not at the meeting last night. If you were there I am confident that you would have been as shocked as everyone else was. You would not not be thanking Mr. Carifi for anything. Judging by the look of his eyes even Mr. Strumolo appeared horrified when Mr. Carifi went on his diatribe. Every board member did. Again, nothing there to thank him for.

Mark

8:31 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

THAT is his first proposal as a new board member? Kick 11 kids out of school?

Who benefits from that?

Reply
Comment_arrow

VietNam Vet

3:59 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I may be wrong but I think the taxpayer will benefit from this. Why should they be forced to pay for kids from out of town to go to school here because their parent works here. If they are going to school here then let their parents pay for it, not the taxpayers here, we already pay for enough nonsence.

Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

9:36 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Hey, Mr. Brown, where ya been? I figured we wouldn't hear you weigh in on this one, since it involves your neighbor and close personal buddy Mike Strumolo. So, let me ask you something: really? Please explain for all of us here who do not have your neighbor how the taxpayer benefits from kicking 11 kids out of school in the MIDDLE OF THE YEAR. Do we get a rebate on the money that has already been budgeted, collected, and spent? Will their teachers have to give back part of their salary because they now have one fewer child in class? Can we sell their text books back to the university bookstore for 1/3 of what we paid for them? Please tell me where the benefit is in disrupting the life of a child so that one person can make a political point? You want to talk about nonsense, let's talk about your posts on this forum. Maybe it's time you started posting under your real name again, so everyone could know just what kind of a person you are, or moved on to a forum that enjoys your sort of post like NJ.com or 4chan.

annoyed

8:40 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Scott, stop sucking up to James Carifi. The only thing he is for is himself and nobody else. That is why he thinks he doesn't have to submit a background check for baseball / softball and his wife had to do it, because he thinks he is above everybody else (goes to show you of what he cares about ) . I am sick and tired of seeing him in the paper outside the police department blotter, and him being referred to as New School Board member and a Captain of the police department. His police position should not have any bearing on different titles ( i.e school board or James Carifi a Captain with Parsippany police up at bat with his soft ball team ) . Who gives a dame what his title is. ( sorry you and other suck ups think he is the best but news flash, he is not ). As for him trying to set up a weekend leadership academy. Its a school board supposably looking out for the kids. Hell with a weekend academy, this is his own idea and he wants it to be known that it is his idea alone. Again, he is all for himself. Here is a novel idea Mr. Carifi, why don't you just be a police captain instead of trying to be things you area not (like interested in things other than yourself ) .

Reply

Scott Dean

8:47 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Regarding the 55 kids without verification if the 11 are granfathered so be it

Reply

Par4theCourse

9:13 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

"I was disappointed in the swearing-in," he said. "They had both of us up there at the same time'

Oh really? Gee, they did that to you? You poor fellow. Get over your ego, will you? I'd immediately say the oft-mentioned "its all about the kids" (insert finger into mouth to induce vomiting) but the next item quashes that. Kick 11 kids out in mid-year? Then that ridiculous idea gets followed by an attempt to implement a group to teach our kids to spy and inform. Just when I thought I've seen it all.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

12:55 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Funny -- thought the same exact thing. Guess when you get promoted at Town Hall by the Mayor (making PPD even more top heavy with unnecessary Captains) this is a let down. Poor baby.

Dennis

9:16 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

With all the dysfunction and hysterics around the PTH BOE, the best idea the 'new guy' can come up with is to immediately toss 11 kids out of school?

What a joke. The board has been - and apparently, shall continue to be - a laughingstock.

Spending an hour debating whether to table discussing meeting minutes? How about taking 5 of those minutes to actually read them and save the arguing? Did that occur to anyone?

And these are the folks we trust with our childrens' education? The inmates are officially running the asylum.

Reply

friend of parsppany

9:28 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

The Board has a bunch of egomaniacs that are there for the wrong reasons. It certainly isn't for the kids. That is obvious. The district is on the downswing parents...hold these people accountable now. Why does the cop want to be on the board? Everyone has agendas but his is worrisome.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

9:47 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Well, FOP, if you're so angry, maybe you should get involved instead of just complaining on the internet. I don't remember seeing your name on the ballot in November. Unless you're Anthony DeIntinis or Allison Coogan. Are you? Guess we'll never know...

Comment_arrow

friend of parsppany

9:54 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

I am a friend. I am being objective. The leaders are rudderless! There needs to be people involved who check their egos and motives at the door. From what I am reading that is not the case, and who suffers. The kids of Parsippany. These guys are probably your buddies.

Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

2:47 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Well, FOP, if what you say is true and we need people who can check their egos at the door, maybe you should apply for the open spot on the Board, since you seem to have all the answers.

steve revette

9:36 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

That meeting was insane. I have never seen anything like that. As far as the law goes I think we're missing something. I means it's only eleven kids now but how many kids were there at one point or another? Also I'm confused about something I thought that a kid can go to a school district outside his town but His home District was reponsible for paying Parsippany the amount it costs to educate each student. What I'm saying is if I'm suppose to be going to Rockaway and instead going to Parsippany and it costs the taxpayers 15000 per student to educate, Rockaway BOE is responsible for paying the 15000 that I use to go to school here. I just don't undestand why a practice like this would ever be approved in the first place.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Natalie Davis

1:55 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Steve, I've been told that when the deal went down there were 15. Now there are 11. The figure will drop until it reaches zero.

Change is Good

9:45 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

So, everyone is OK with covering the costs of students from other towns with our tax dollars? What's next, the garbage men who work for Parsippany but living elsewhere putting their trash on our curbs? Where does it stop? Address it all, fry the big fish first, there are always some who are resistant to change. If we keep doing things the same way the results will never change.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J Locke

10:39 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

There's a big difference between students from other towns illegally pretending to be residents and these 11 children who are openly in district because their parents teach here. Also remember that the district ended this policy years ago to save money, but in the interest of decency decided not to upend and disrupt the lives of these very few children - and simply let them finish their schooling. So, the practice will inevitably end without wasting the time to "study" the issue.
As far as payment, this practice was historically a nice thing to do to help out teachers who were parents. Since people throughout the state did it, the costs mainly evened out. For example, while Parsippany might be paying the tuition of 11 out of district students, other towns would have been paying the tuition of Parsippany residents going to school with their parent-teachers.
But, AGAIN, this practice has ended anyway. So, please, let's just move on.

Comment_arrow

Jeff

12:47 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

The answer is YES. Maybe for the next calendar year -- we should look at it. However - this is heartless type of change negatively impacting children for what gain. I had no idea this guy is so uninformed and mean spirited -- scary to think he is a captain in our police department

Tim Berrios

10:00 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Disgraceful. I couldn’t believe what I was watching. Mr. “Captain” Carifi I was one of the 8200 votes you received in November. I voted for you because after all the “Meet the Candidate” forums I attended I felt you were fresh, energetic, and informed. As a parent of two children in the Parsippany school system I felt they were in good hands. But last night one of your first acts as a new Board member was to make a motion to toss out 11 students of teachers grandfathered in under the old policy. Even after the Board attorney painfully explained the consequences of your motion multiple times you stick with your motion. Sadly enough it was seconded by Mr. Martin. For the second time in 3 years I wish I could take my vote back.
Mr. Carifi you said you were speaking for the tax payers of Parsippany. You were not speaking for this tax payer. I am asking you to check your ego at the door and move the ball forward for the children of Parsippany. Fight for the right things…push for a fair teacher’s contract now…be fiscally responsible …make the Parsippany School system a model for success and not greed and hubris.

Madam President it is painfully obvious what has happened here and the big egos are on full display. I am asking you as a tax payer to do what IS NECESSARY to keep the children and our schools in the forefront of these meetings.

Tim Berrios

Reply

Joan Callamezzo

11:03 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Dear Captain/Board Member Carifi,
I was one of the 8,251 who voted for you and that you mentioned last night. Is it too late to change my vote? In my 40 plus years of attending board meetings I have never seen such hubris nor lack of understanding of what a school board member is elected to do. I suggest that the teachers of those 11 children who still attend our school district bring their children to the next board meeting so Mr. Carifi can look those very children in the eye and and say "bye bye. I don't want you." I am very aware of the division on the school board but one thing I always knew was that every single board member really did have the best interest of the children as their number one priority. I can't say that anymore. Shameful, shameful behavior from Mr. Carifi.

Reply
Comment_arrow

VietNam Vet

4:10 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Well Joan if you want these teachers kids to be educated here then I say deduct the cost of their education from the teachers salary, why should the taxpayers be forced to pay for something we had no say in? Or maybe you would like to pay for them instead?

Angelina

11:25 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

While I also disagree with Mr. Carifi suggesting to remove 11 kids from the school district before the school year has concluded, i do agree with his motion to make them pay to come here. If it's easier on their parents to bring their kids to work with them, which i feel is completely inappropriate anyway, they should pay for it. Why should we pay for their kids to use our already overpopulated schools? Thats ABSURD! if they arent willing to cover the cost, they should be removed from our district in the next school year, 100%. I could not agree more.
As far as the other 45-55 students who can't even prove they belong here they should be forced to show proof they are eligible to be here and if they can't they should have to transfer to where they belong. It's not the children, its the irresponsibility of their parents they should be the ones responsible...it's their fault if their kids have to switch schools. They don't pay the taxes for it, so they shouldnt be coming here. It's that simple. I'm sure all of you complain about tax hikes anyway everytime the gov raises them. All of a sudden this is okay just because you dont like James carifi? Hypocrits.
and Tim---Carifi stated multiple times in his campaign that one of his main priorities was to stop letting these students into our schools that don't even belong in our district. So that's your fault for not reading up on what you were voting on, so shame on you for being irresponsible and then complaining about it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim Berrios

12:06 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

“Ange” Thank you for your thoughts. Yes I do agree with Mr. Carifi and anyone else who feels that the Parsippany tax payers should not fit the bill for out of district students attending our schools. As I’m sure you are aware I believe this practice was stopped in 2010 and these 11 students were grandfathered in. I do remember Mr. Carifi campaigning on this issue so thank you for reminding me. However I must have missed the part about removing these 11 students mid-year without process.
I also must have missed the campaign promises about going 2.5 hours into a Board of Education meeting and showing off our egos and getting nothing accomplished.

Joan Callamezzo

11:33 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

"Ange"
The 45-55 students did in fact prove that they lived in Parsippany. If they were unable to prove that they didn't live in Parsippany, the district would not let them attend school in Parsippany. This was stated at the meeting. Also, the policy of allowing out of town teachers to bring their children to the school district was eliminated several years ago. These 11 children were grandfathered in and soon there will be none. It is a non issue.

Reply

Michael Brancato

11:50 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

"No pupil shall be removed from school unless the parent, guardian, adult pupil or resident keeping an “affidavit pupil” (as defined in N.J.A.C. 6A:22-1.2) as the case may be, has been informed of his or her entitlement to a hearing before the Board of Education."

"Notices of ineligibility shall include:
A clear statement that the pupil is entitled to attend school for the twenty-
one day period during which an appeal can be made to the Commissioner,
but that, if missing information is not provided or an appeal is not filed, the pupil will not be permitted to attend school beyond the 21st day
following the date of the notice;"

"Where enrollment is denied and an intent to appeal is indicated, or where enrollment is provisional subject to further review or information, enrollment or attendance at school shall not be conditioned on advance payment of tuition in
whole or part."

From the BOE's own policy:
http://www.pthsd.k12.nj.us/pdf/policies/Parsippany%20Troy%20Hills%205000%20042310.pdf

http://www.pthsd.k12.nj.us/pdf/policies/Parsippany%20Troy-Hills%20R5000%20042310.pdf

Seems Mr. Carifi has some more homework to do. This rule about faculty member's children dates to 2010, so what are we talking about here? Third graders? High schoolers? Is it really going to cost us that much to let them finish the school year, especially since the money has already been budgeted?

Reply

Angelina

11:55 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

oh really, because carifi clearly stated the proper documentation was not provided. And it was then stated, by the President no less, that the issue would be looked into as a "Critical issue". nothing in this article states that they provided the propr documentation to show their proof. It just says it will be looked into and researched.
As for the 11---They were grandfathered into it and noone ever made it an issue until now. So it's been brought to the table, and it should be dealt with appropriately just like everything else...or they should not be in our schools effective sept. 2013. There is no reason for it at all other than ease for thier parents. Wouldn't it be nice if all parents who actually struggle everyday w/childcare or getting their kids to school and home between 2 or 3 jobs could bring their kids to work with them and make their lives easier. This $15000 per student in our taxes yet as soooon as our pathetic president adds a tax hike to something you all cry about it. Does this make sense? no.
I dont understand why you carifi voters are so surprised that he's doing this. If you followed his campaign, as i mentioned before, this was always his goal. Are you surprised because for ONCE an elected official, town or BOE, is ACTUALLY doing what they said they would? I know this unheard of in our town lately, but this how it should be. Make a promise, keep the promise once you're voted in. So if u voted for him u shouldnt complaining.

Reply

Joan Callamezzo

12:15 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

No "Ange", Carifi said he had specific evidence that children other than the 11 attended the school district and did not live in Parsippany and he had hard evidence to prove it. On more than one occasion last night he promised to share the evidence but he never did. "Ange," did you know that there are 13 students that live in Parsippany but attend other school districts because their parents teach outside of Parsippany? By your reasoning and Mr. Carifi's, I suppose we should pull those 13 students back, leaving our district with a net plus 2. To hell with disrupting each of these children's school year.

Reply

Angelina

12:33 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Joan.. obviously the other schools don't care and that's their problem not mine. And shouldn't be yours either. So I wouldn't go there. And I'm pretty sure the issue was tabled last night from further discussion because the president wanted to research the issue. And if you would read my comments more carefully before throwing you two sense into what I say, you would have read that I DO NOT agree with pulling them in the middle of the year and I clearly said that effective SEPT 2013 they should not be in our schools. So please read more carefully before you speak the wrong thing.

Reply

J Locke

12:37 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

"Ange," I don't know if you have children, but consider the impact on these 11 kids. Their parents brought them into this district when policy still allowed it to happen. You're quite wrong that "no one ever made it an issue until now." It was a big issue some years ago when the BOE voted to no longer allow teacher-parents to do this, but in the interests of not disrupting the education of these 11 kids allow them to finish up their schooling.
If a child is in the 1st or 2nd grade it's probably not a big deal to switch to a new school with new curriculums and teachers, etc, but if the student is in middle or high school, then it's a pretty big deal and will a pretty big impact - and for no other reason than a parent-teacher doing what he/she was legally entitled to do at the time.
And as Joan just mentioned, there are Parsippany students in other districts.
And, by the way, just because you can't think of any other reasons, doesn't mean that "ease for their parents" was the only reason these teachers moved students to their districts. There are many other possibilities.

Reply

Jeff

12:41 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

This is disgusting if this is the platform that Carifi is running on. Kick kids out mid-term from school. Seriously. Remember "Captain" -- you are there for the children.

Reply

Carol M.

1:02 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

I’d say that the word structure is a sub for pomp and circumstance. I hope our new BOE member will quickly realize that the job is not about him, or having power, or about a big show for family or the audience but rather about serving children & our community by focusing on education. What happened to being honored to serve or to doing what’s best for children? How is it that Mr Carifi was completely unprepared to vote on some matter of fact business but could be so prepared to launch an assault on 11 innocent children by calling for an immediate vote without even a single shred of paper to support his position or a moment to think? For what purpose; to make HIS campaign promises whole? I can't even imagine the type of person that would be willing to ban a 5th grader, or a senior from completing the school year without any evidence that it would even save the taxpayer a penny. I can't even imagine the type of person who would intentionally have a negative impact on a child without taking time to even think about his actions. I can’t imagine the type of person who thinks reporting children & families that have fallen on hard times & had to move their children in with relatives to the housing depart. is what our schools should be doing. I'm physically shaking and ill over the thought that this type of person will now make decisions about my children, our children. God help all our children when this type thinks its ok for a campaign promise to trump a child’s well being

Reply

friend of parsppany

1:04 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

How did the captain win on that Platform? No one comes to those meetings or reads the minutes. It is like an election in school-a popularity contest!

Reply

Brian

2:27 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

I wasn't up there by my self I in the spot light by myself ) , Oh yeah I mean my family wasn't up there with me. Very disorganized. No structure " I am a person who needs structure". NO YOU are a person who needs to be the bully in the room:) BOO HOO Mr. Carifi I mean Parsippany Police CAPTAIN CRY BABY.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

2:49 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Very mature Brian. Do us a favor: go back to NJ.com and leave this conversation to the adults, ok?

friend of parsppany

2:55 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

"Trolls" I didn't mean to touch a nerve. Adults-there were none on the board last night I understand.

Reply

Kevin

3:39 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

I'd like to point out that removing these 11 kids from the district isn't going to show an actual gain in the school budget. The 15k per kid # is bogus. We don't actually pay a set amount per kid. The costs to run the district are not done per student. Having 11 extra kids across 14 school buildings is not ACTUALLY costing us taxpayers a penny more.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

4:31 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Actually Kevin, the cost per student should go up if you remove the 11 kids. Same total cost fewer kids to divide it by. You make a great point. Unless you eliminate cost, removing those kids is nothing more than a symbolic gesture. Well done.

Judy Selikoff Mayer

5:46 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

I was horrified by last night's board meeting. To think that Mr. Carifi is now in a position to make decisions that affect our students is frightening. Last night he demonstrated gnorance and arrogance. He wast happy with the swearing in???? He wanted to be sworn in by himself with his family by his side???? Come on!! He needs to get over himself. As far as the students of teachers in the district who were GRANDFATHERED in, say let them be. I am a taxpayer and I don't have a problem with letting them finish their education. If Parsippany truly is the place to be let compassion be one of our traits. I am sick of hearing how many votes he got. I daresay that had his name been further down on the ballot that would not have been the case. It's interesting to read that people who did vote for him are wishing they hadn't. So my advice to our newest board member is leave your ego at the door and think about developing people skills.

Reply

Mike

6:20 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Remember there is no i's in team but two in Carifi. You were told many times not to vote for him. He is not a team player as you can see that in his statement that he should have been sworn in alone with his family. Stop crying. I wonder if James has a problem with his patrolmen not living in town? So I guess we will have to put up with Jim for a few years.

Reply

Gordon Rizzuto

9:18 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Maybe James didn't go about it the right way but he is right. Fact of the matter is those kids have no business being in the school system. Should we hire a kid's mother as a teacher at a school because her child goes to that school and it would give him a ride? I work in the city maybe my children should go to school in the city because I work there. No because I am paying Parsippany my property taxes and Parsippany is where WE live. I take exception that this was allowed in the first place. Kids should go to the school district where they live NOT where their parents work. Whether it be 1 student or 50 students it's not fair. As for the lady who said I'm a taxpayer and I don't mind. Well I'm also a taxpayer and I do mind.

Reply

Anya Sheiffele

9:21 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Wow, I don't know where to start.....with the horrible feeling I had when I read this or the utter distaste I felt for Mr. Carifi due to his lack of humility: he shouldn't have to stand next to Dr. Calabria, not getting his "own" time to shine? Side note, he should take a lot of lessons from Dr. Calabria on consensus building and managing tenuous working relationships.

This Board better get down to the real work of the district: reducing class sizes, improving NJASK & SAT scores through improved curriculums (hint: get rid of Go Math in elementary schools & work on comprehension!), and bringing back services that were cut 2+ years ago.

I expect more educated & informed ideas from those "running" our school board.

Reply

Carol M.

10:22 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

It's a shame that a recall vote of Mr Carifi can't be initiated until November 15th, 2013. I've already marked my calendar; I don't think there is a more valid reason to recall a BOE member then when one starts his term with the intention of deliberately harming specific children. If you want to make a change that impacts children after thoughtful consideration I believe most could respect that but if you demand immediate action without basis, fact or expert opinion, that you know will negatively impact children then you should not be on the BOE. I sincerely hope that the other members of the BOE will always do what's best for children and will protect them from Mr Carifi's efforts in the meanwhile.

Reply

Mike

10:52 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

Keep all this in mind when his brother runs for mayor!!!!!! Then we will maybe have four i's in carifi.

Reply

Nancy Choffo

10:54 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

'Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before.' How does Mr. Carifi know for a fact that there are children in our township schools that don't live here? I am talking about the 45 to 55 pupils he refered to. If he was only sworn into the position last night and wasn't even ready for that meeting, where did he get his so called facts from? It worries me. Did the Police Captain look through confindential records. Please let me know how he got this information. I'm just very curious and a bit worried. Big Brother is always watching.

Reply

Gordon Rizzuto

12:30 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Carol negatively impacting children? There's NO reason why those kids can't go to the schools they belong too. Also for all you know one of those kids might be a bully or something or getting bullied. I agree that Mr. Carifi didn't go about it the right way but he has a right to his opinion like we do. Also to Nancy I find it hard to believe that every single student that ever went through ANY school district belonged there. I'm sorry to say while you guys insult Mr. Cariffi he is fighting for what he believes in. The free ride at the expense of others should be over and we should STOP looking the other way. We need to start looking at reality and not what we want to see. Let those kids who are children of staff finish out the year and then get them out of the district. As far as grandfathering in what a joke. So are bullies who bullied kids before the HIB law excused from the rule because they were being bullies before it went into effect. Should I be excused from the texting and driving law because it wasn't a law when I got my license? Should I wear my seatbelt? Like I said. Let those kids finish out the year and then start enforcing the rule.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol M.

8:31 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Mr Rizzuto I was very much in favor of the change the BOE made a few years ago when they eliminated the practice of allowing the children of employees to attend school here. I was not a huge fan of the decision to grandfather current children but I could see the reasoning behind that part. I can also understand that some may be strongly apposed to the grandfather clause and want to consider changing that but there is a right and a wrong way to go about it and Mr Carifi's demand that immediate action be taken against those children is wrong and harmful to the CHILDREN. The scariest part of all of this is that Mr Carifi obviously put a lot of thought into this and his answer was not to address his concerns through a reasonable process which involved input from the rest of the board, or gathering information in any way, his answer was to demand action against CHILDREN. Thats no rookie mistake; there is no question in my mind that Mr Carifi completely disregarded what was in the best interest of children. You can have the most brilliant idea in the world but if you refuse to consider whether your idea will have a negative impact on children and demand immediate action regardless then you have NO BUSINESS making decisions that impact children!

Scott Dean

7:12 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

I was not at the meeting, I cant say I agree on tossing kids out of school either.
I will say that people seem to read into things and take the worse possible scenario because it is easier then to see the good of it.
The fact that Mr.Carifi is showing no bias regarding this subject regarding the 11 or the 55 shows me that he believes this to be a burden to the taxpayers.
He is not trying to hurt kids, he is trying to hold the adults accountable!!
Something that has not been done on the board in recent future.
"Whats good for the goose " well you know the rest...

Reply

Scott Dean

7:18 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

One more thought

When the overcrouding of schools story comes up again and the sour patching begins this will give you 66 reasons not to complain..just sayin

Reply

Joe

8:56 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Keep the kids in school as long as the teachers are employeed. This is a slap in the face to the teachers union who correct me if I am wrong, are still working without a contract. The teachers at the time were allowed to enroll their children in the distrct as part of a contract agreement and should be entitled to keep them in the district. As stated by other people, plain and simple, if these 11 kids were kicked out of school, the district will not save any money and no money will be going back into the pockets of the tax payers from this action. I am sure that as a union employee, Mr. Carifi would not appreciate and would defend any and all entitlements that may have been granted to him under a contract. I don't know why he would want to attack the teachers who are the backbone of our education system. The teachers deserve better than this and the time and energy should be used at settling the contract rather than kicking 11 kids out school.

Reply

Gerry Manneng

10:36 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

You have to love it . I ask all of the people who are complaing about Mr. Carifi. Don't you realize that these students who don't belong here have been costing the taxpayers of our town millions of dollars over the years. Dollars that could have been spent on our kids, the kids who should be here. So don't complain about your taxes constantly going up anymore if your in favor of allowing students to have a free ride on you and me. I'm all in favor of giving our kids the best education possible, OUR KIDS. Use our money for our kids. I think that is the point Mr. Carifi is trying to get across here

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monica Sclafani

9:28 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

"... costing us millions of dollars over the years"? We're talking about 11 kids here across 14 schools. The teacher has already been budgeted for; the books have already been paid for (25 per our class size policy); the classroom is already there and the lights and heat need to be turned on no matter how many kids in the class. Taking one child times 11 out of a class will not change these facts. Please show me the math where we are spending millions.

Par4theCourse

10:38 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Let's not forget Mr. Martin who blindly seconded this absurd motion. It's like that old cartoon with the mutt and the chihuahua..."hey spike, look at me, spike"!!!

Reply

Gordon Rizzuto

10:48 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Well Carol I understand why Mr. Carifi would want to take action IMMEDIATELY because those kids never had any reason being in the school district. Also I couldn't care less if the teachers are working without a contract. There's no reason that their kids shouldn't be going to school where they belong. Why should I have to pay money for to educate somebody who doesn't even live in Parsippany?

Reply
Comment_arrow

NJ Resident

2:24 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Mr. Rizzuto,
I wholeheartedly agree with you. We have no children in this school system and never attended ourselves. However, the taxes in this town have increased over the years to the point many people we know have or are considering moving. According to the reports from the State Board of Education, it costs approximately 13 thousand dollars, per student, per year, while the average teacher (notice, i said AVERAGE) salary is about 61 thousand per year. So, not only do we pay for the teacher, now we pay for their child. Public schools are not "free". Someone has to pay for them. The arguement can also fall the other way and say that what about families with 5 or 6 kids in the school system who pay the same amount of tax? However, that is not the topic today. Parsippany has reduced its services to the residents, increased the taxes and now they want us to pay for out of district students. how is that fair? how is it fair to those of us who pay taxes for a school system we never attended either?

Gerry Manneng

10:54 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

It's called accountability. Just like who was responsible for allowing someone who wasn't qualified to be a coach, coach the football team at Parsippany High School. Looks like Mr. Carifi is trying to hold people accountable and is looking out for all of the taxpayers in Parsippany as well as the students. In previous years many people have complained about cutting transportation for some of our students or cutting some after school programs, well I ask you this if these students who shouldn't have been here all these years and have cost the town millions of dollars over the years weren't here, that money could have been used to save the things that had to be cut.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

12:57 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Please do the math for us and tell us how many millions will be saved by disenfranchising six kids? I really want to know. Are we eliminating any teachers? Will benefit costs drop? Will utility bills be lower?
I think you and Gordon really need to think before you guys write. Your logic makes no sense. Millions!! Really????

Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

1:02 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

I apologize I said six. It's eleven. While your making up your math suppose you do it for the other fifty-five as well. I can't wait to see the numbers.

Gordon Rizzuto

11:25 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Thank you Gerry I couldn't say so better myself.

Reply

friend of parsppany

11:39 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

There sounds to be a lot of, why did I vot for this guy? It is a valid question. I think most of you that voted must have know what an ego this guy has. He is known to be a show-off. Not good for the kids of Parsippany!

Reply

Gerry Manneng

11:46 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Friend of Parsippany, sounds like you don't live in Parsippany. Maybe one of your kids is getting a free ride.

Reply

Todd M. Finchler

12:10 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

There are a few concepts in play here that bear relevance regardless of how you feel about this policy. Even if you are steadfastly against allowing out-of-district students to attend school in town, please consider the following.

Proportionality. Is it suitable to immediately expel these children from the district even though they have done nothing wrong and didn't have anything to do with the adoption of this policy? Is the nominal gain to be realized - i.e., 11 fewer children in district - outweighed by the detriment to these children?

Due Process. Expulsion requires a substantial amount of due process. Students subject to expulsion have demonstrated substantial deviations from acceptable behavior. Do we not accord the innocent, out-of-district students some level of due process? Or do we just evict them from their classrooms - and from longstanding social relationships with classmates?

Blame and Consequence. Are these 11 children to blame? If not, and thus far no one has suggested they are blameworthy, why would we bring upon them such a harsh consequence?

The BOE has extensive policies and regulations in place that address students, teachers, support staff, etc. They address at length how the BOE should address various issues.

When public officials take unilateral actions without according due process, lawsuits wind up being filed. And then the public is up in arms about the cost of lawsuits.

The ends do not justify the means here.

Reply

patchitup1

1:20 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

"Angry Mobs after 11children" Capt. Frankenstein, just like the angry people who sat in 2 1/2 hour gas lines in Super Storm Sandy! Only it was ok to flash a badge & cut the line to fill up your friends Bentleys then? Anyway you slice it it's Not us tax payers you care about.... It's just more power for you!

Reply

friend of parsppany

1:42 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Where does this police officer get all this cash?

Reply

Gerry Manneng

2:33 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

What you people seem to forget, this is not just about 11 students that are kids of teachers, how about all of the other students that don't really live in town that are in our schools. If a teacher/coach got in who wasn't qualified how easy is it for a student. I agree with Mr. Carifi, spend our taxpayer money on our kids and use that money to continue to improve upon the things we can offer our students. I believe Mr. Carifi is for the kids the kids of Parsippany. Next time we hear we need to cut something from the budget, think about it, if we weren't paying for kids that don't live in Parsippany , those things probably wouldn't have to be cut.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

3:47 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

So, here's a funny little story: searching Google for Gerry Manneng reveals that there is no Gerry Manneng in Parsippany, NJ. There is, however, a Jerry Manning, who is 78 years old and used to regularly attend BOE meetings. Did you misspell your name, Mr. Manning? Or are you someone else who is trying to hide his identity because he doesn't want people to know that he is personally involved in the BOE's goings on?

friend of parsppany

2:53 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Okay, it is an issue but it isn't #1 and your buddy has gotten off to a poor sport. Nothing worse than a cop with a big head! Does the chief spport this?

Reply

Maurice Saunders

3:36 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

We are talking about 11 kids here right. 11 kids here. I wasn't at the meeting but did Mr. Carifi provide the breakdown of the grades these 11 kids are in. It wouldn't seem right to kick a senior of school that he/she been in for 4 1/2 years in this article/comments it that the 11 were "grandfathered" and this practice has been stopped so in the next few years these 11 would have graduated.
If the goal is to ensure that Parsippany school only allow Parsippany residents, I'm sure a better way of handling the 11 students can be thought of rather than ripping a child out of school mid year and negatively impact his studies, friendships and sports. This just seems so heartless to the 11 students and their parents/our teachers.
If I was a Parsippany teacher and I was told it was ok for my child to attend a Parsippany school without any additional cost. I would be upset at what happened at this meeting and it would break my heart to my kid that he's being kicked out of school because NOW the BOE is saying it's not ok now.

I'm sure there are more important issues in our schools than planning to kick out 11 students of our teachers. Way to go Par-Troy BOE! Way to go!

Reply

Gordon Rizzuto

4:16 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Maybe Kicking the kids out right now is a bit harsh but they've never should have been allowed in to begin with. Let them finish out the year and then let them leave. Kids move all the time. I think grandfathering in for anything is a bit ridiculous. Should I be excused from the texting and driving law because I got my license before the law went into effect? No. I think heartless is telling taxpayers that Teachers kids are BETTER then OUR kids. If even of those kids has a HISTORY of Being a bully or bullied by OTHERS then they should go immediately. It's not fair to that child of the teacher to be bullied when he doesn't belong at that school just like it wouldn't be fair if that was doing the bullying to other students when he doesn't even belong there. If even of those KIDS has a history being bullied or being the bully then they need to go. We can't have that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

4:30 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Gordon Rizzuto? Was your dad a big Yankees fan? What are you, a 4-6 put out at second? Or just that unimaginative? Because I don't see a listing for you in Parsippany, Gordon. In fact, the only place your name appears is in the Wayne patch and in a listing from Pennsylvania. So why do you care so much about Parsippany BOE policy, if you don't even live here? Why not use your real name if you're going to be so critical, or are you hiding something?

Comment_arrow

Gordon Rizzuto

4:35 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Sick of the Trolls I use to live elsewhere but I moved to Parsippany pretty recently. It's not my real name just a made up one. I don't like throwing my names on boards like this. But let me tell you I have nothing but respect for the Teachers of Parsippany and I love my children's teachers. My neighbors have made us feel very welcome here. I just disagree with the policy.

Katherine Jones

4:22 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

People seem to be missing the issue here, it's not just that 11 students of the teachers, its all of the other kids as well. Everyone in town knows there are kids in our schools that don't live in Parsippany in addition to those kids of teachers. Everone that refers to the 11 kids, are you suggesting they get special treatment because they are teachers or employees kids. It's about all of the kids that don't belong here that you and I have been paying for for years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joan Callamezzo

6:08 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Katherine, when you write, "everyone in town knows there are kids in our schools that don't live in Parsippany in addition to those kids of teachers," who are they? If there are children who do not live in Parsippany aside from the 11 but attend the school district, I could not agree with you more. But who are they and how do you know? If you know of someone, you should inform the district office and they will deal with it.

Gordon Rizzuto

4:26 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Kevin I don't care about the amount of money we saved or don't save. It's about right and wrong. I admit it's not okay to remove kids in the middle of the year. At that same time if even one of those kids is a bully I don't think it's fair to say to a parent that their child is being bullied by a kid who doesn't belong going to school there and the reason he's allowed to do all that is because he's part of a Grandfathering cause. Like I said if ANY of those kids bullied even one KID then we're turning our backs on that one kid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

9:57 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Coat is the issue here. The policy was amended quite awhile ago and I would like you to put out your math and show us where all the money is that we are going to save.
As for your rant about these kids being bullies and being treated different. You are the only person bringing that up.
Why don't you get your facts strait or do you just feel it's okay to just start something based on assumption.

Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

9:58 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Here's some facts that I am aware of.
1- There is no added cost due to these 11 kids being educated here. They will be gone when they graduate or the parent leaves the district. No additional students of teachers that don't live in the district will be accommodated under this policy.
If a teacher that currently lives in the district moves and there child is currently enrolled in our district. The child must move to the new school district.
2- This was a perk for teachers in our district. These kids have been grandfathered and the policy was changed.
3- The board has taken appropriate steps to eliminate students illegally coming to our schools. Did you know that all students must re-register at least twice at different times just to make sure make sure they still live here?
4- If there is bullying going on do you really believe that anyone would overlook the policies in place to deal with it, just because they are a teachers kids? What an insult to the teachers. Same thing for the special treatment you allege.
If you just moved here welcome but you really need to check your facts before you start defending stuff that you know nothing about.
Please put up your facts or shut up.

Nancy Choffo

4:36 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

This issue of allowing employee's children access to the education in this town has been stopped a few years ago. We are allowing 11 children to complete the education that they were allowed to start in the first place here. It cost us no more money to do this. There was no tax burden on the residents because there were no additional classes needed and the books are available. It was settled years ago. This BOE needs to move on to more important issues. Let's leave the children alone. It's getting harder to be a child in this generation. Maybe the adults should grow up and start trying to help make this a safe and better world for kids to live in. We have so many more people looking to harm children these days and it is making me sick.

Reply

Angelina

4:46 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Sick of the trolls..no offense but do u have nothing better to do then Google people who comment on here ? Stalkers like u r the reason ppl don't put full names, like urself. So stop hiding if ur gonna be a bully.I've lost track of whose side u r on anyway haha. Ur just a very rude obnoxious person

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

5:29 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

"Ange," I try not to take a side. I started this account because the incivility of certain comments became more than I could sit back and watch. Some people like to use the anonymity afforded them by the internet to make rude, libelous, ridiculous comments about public officials, or to say offensive things just to get a reaction out of people. I call them out on it when they do, and try to give some back. People like "Gordon Rizzuto," who use a real sounding pseudonym really bother me, because they're trying to make it seem like they are using their real names. I generally let it go, unless they become belligerent and rude, then I point it out to them. Depending on how they react to that determines how I will continue to treat them. I don't stalk anyone, I have never threatened anyone, but sometimes when people act like bullies, you need to bully them back. As I have said before, when people use their real names to say mean, hateful, spiteful, false things, I will too.

Comment_arrow

Angelina

9:19 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Trolls-- you sound like a child. I cannot even take your repsonse seriously, as it is childish, completely ridiculous, hypocritical and a total waste of time. "when people act like bullies you need to bully them back" are you freaking kidding me? I hope you dont have children because that's a terrible terrible thing to teach. Bullies are why there are more and more children committing suicide, or shooting up schools and movie theaters, and your resolution to having someone "bully" you is to do the same thing right back? that's a very sad way to think. I pity your children if you have any and i hope there is someone in their life to teach them right from wrong. and honestly..how can you even bad mouth people who dont use a real name when YOU DONT EITHER!!! grow up dude. and stop stalking others for speaking their mind just because they don't agree with you.

Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

9:48 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Yeah, PR, I am on here a lot. I love Parsippany. It's a great place. I've lived here a long time. And you'll notice that I only go after certain people: people who use fake names to make grand accusations for which they have no proof. People who write angry, disparaging comments and hide behind the anonymity of the internet. People like you, Parsippany Resident, who attack other users because they state their opinions and beliefs in reasonable and sensible tones and then are accosted by trolls who disagree with them. I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings, but since you seem to have no regard for the feelings of others, I'm not too broke up about it. I suggest if it bothers you that much, either start using your real name and letting your neighbors know just what kind of person you are, or go post somewhere else. NJ.com's forums seem to really like people like you, why don't you try them?

Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

9:56 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

As for you, "Ange," I've tried not to go after you for your incredibly poor spelling and grammar, since that is a petty and pedantic thing, but calling me childish is the last straw. You write your comments in indecipherable text language that hurts my eyes to look at and your comments are always long drawn out rants, devoid of punctuation much less content. You are the worst kind of internet poster, one who simply babbles on and on about nothing and clogs up boards such as these. I was always taught that the best way to deal with a bully is to stand up to one, and I will not let you bully me. Excuse me if I believe that people should own their comments, that if you're going to accuse someone of wrongdoing you should sign your name to it. Excuse me if I want to know which of my neighbors is making crackpot accusations and acting like a fool. There are plenty of places on the internet where anonymous ranting is accepted and encouraged, excuse me if I want one place where people can have an adult conversation about real issues using their real names, without people like you who muddle up everything with useless, incoherent, unreadable commentary that usually has little or nothing to do with the discussion. If you don't like it, feel free to post on any of the numerous other websites like NJ.com and leave this one for real people who want to have a real discussion about real topics. This is my last word on the subject, you may continue, but you'll be talking to yourself.

Comment_arrow

Angelina

11:31 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Trolls--HAHA! Thank you SO MUCH for the laugh in the middle of my day. Honestly, it was much needed! enjoy your day buddy.

Maurice Saunders

4:50 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

It's quite alarming that this issue could have come to vote at the meeting and kids kicked out of school that they have been attending for years without any real discussion and analysis of the facts. Thanks for Golderer wanting the matter to go to the policy committee. There's always talk about what the cost is to something. I'm not saying cost is not important as I am parsippany tax payer and I have kids that have graduated and currently attend a parsippany school..but I also want the Board to do the right thing. Let's get all the facts about this issue an come up with a solution that right and fair.

If Board member Carifi campaigned on this issue he should be able to come up with something that right and fair beside a motion kicked out of town kids out of school the next morning because it was a campaign promise. Applaud him holding up his promise but let's be civil at the same time.

Reply

Joan Callamezzo

5:00 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

There used to be a policy that allowed the children of teachers to attend the Parsippany school district. Several years ago the board changed the policy and ended this practice but allowed the children who were still enrolled to continue. There are 11 students left. The board should live up to their end of the bargain and let it be. In a few years these children will graduate and we will be done with it. There is some confusion with regards to the 45-55 other students. People assume that these children do not live in the district. This is not true. The administration stated the other night that these 45-55 students were verified and live in Parsippany. Whether they live with their parents, grandparents, uncles or aunts does not matter. The law is very clear. If the child lives in Parsippany, we must educate them. End of story. Now, few people see the irony in Capt. Carifi's teacher's contract quip. Here is a man who is paid by the taxpayers of Parsippany and earns much more than any teacher...actually he makes more than Dr. Seitz does. At least Dr. Seitz pays his own dry cleaning and gas bill. The taxpayers pay for Capt. Carifi's.

Reply

Scott Dean

5:03 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Thank you Mr.Saunders, let us get past the first 48 hours.Cost is an issue and I think that will be shown soon enough.Hard nosed may not make the people happy but if it produces results than Im for it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

10:01 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Hi Scott, Beg to disagree but I'd like you or anyone else to show us where all the added expense is here.
What costs get eliminated by removing these kids?
Please lay out the math for me.

Joe Simpson

5:14 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Joan Callamezzo, obviously you are not a very educated person who doesn't have a clue and likes to tell lies. You should really excuse youself from this discussion if you're going to continue to state things about people that are not true. Put your money where your mouth is and prove that any employee makes what Dr. Seitz does. Were you a supporter of Mrs. Orme or Orthweine who supported giving Dr. Seitz that unbelievable raise.

Reply

Joe Simpson

5:20 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Here's one for all of the people that want the fields to be turfed. The BOE may have had the money to budget for upgrades over the years, with all the money that would have been saved had we the taxpayers not been paying for all of the students that are not truly residents of Parsippany over all these years .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

10:05 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Same question to you. Show us the math. The expensive perks that teachers and administrator had were dealt with and eliminated awhile ago. Are there new facts?
Stop making claims on things you don't know about or at least make an effort to get the facts before you start accusing people.

Joan Callamezzo

5:24 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Joe Simpson, according to the 2012 budget posted on the township website, Capt. Carifi earns $142,000 base salary. That figure does not include his dry-cleaning, overtime, township vehicle with gas and many other entitlements his contract allows for. I suggest that you call the township bookkeep and ask. You will see that his total compensation package is greater than Dr. Seitz' is. And just to let you know, Capt. Carifi is not the highest earner on the police force.

Reply

Gordon Rizzuto

5:28 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

But like I said Joan we can't have it both ways. I don't know anything about the other 45 to 55 students but the other one is pretty clear to me regarding those 11. By allowing those 11 kids to go to school here means it's perfectly okay for them to break rules. I heard that kids might get their phone taken away if they have theirs out but I can guarantee the rule is loose for these 11 kids. And Like I said earlier you might be doing these kids or another kid a favor by getting rid of them. Like I said earlier if one of the 11 is a bully I don't think we should tell parents your child is being bullied because the one doing the bullying is one of 11 kids who rules do not apply to. Do not tell me that children of Teachers are treated EXACTLY THE SAME as all other students in the exact same situations. I can almost guarantee that if my child got caught with their phone out it would get taken away. If that same person caught the child of a teacher and knows the teacher it would not get taken away. Can you honestly tell me everyone will be treated equally all cross the board?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol M.

10:06 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Mr Rizzuto it would seem that you share an objectionable quality with Mr Carifi, basing your judgments on, no facts in evidence.

For someone like you & I that's nothing more then a character trait but for someone in the position to impact children or citizens in our community, thats a very dangerous thing. Removing children from our schools effective immediately with no regard for any factual information about the benefit or detriment is no different then throwing someone in jail and saying, I've rendered my guilty judgement and I'll follow up some time later with the evidence to show I'm right. Since I don't know Mr Carifi personally I have nothing other then how he conducted himself last week, and what he said and did to base my judgment of him. The facts in evidence as of right now show me he has no regard for the well being of children (and that his campaign promise is more important then the policies and practices of our schools) and that he is willing to take immediate action against someone prior to gathering all the pertinent information. With that, I'm not only seriously concerned for our children but am questioning if that's how he conducts himself elsewhere.

Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

10:07 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Again, Where are your facts? All I see you talk about is your opinion. Please stop confusing the issue with your conjecture or is everyone stupid but you?

Comment_arrow

Kevin

4:27 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

You do know that we have Parsippany teachers living in Parsippany whose kids will go to Parsippany schools, right? By your logic above, we should remove all kids that have teachers for parents from the schools.

I'm not one for pointing out stupid on these boards, but you sir are not posting anything that relates to the subject at hand. Your theory on bullying and getting caught with cell phones has nothing to do with Mr. Carifi's hopes to yank 11 kids out of the school in the middle of the school year.

Joan Callamezzo

5:39 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Gordon, I have no idea who the 11 students are nor which schools they attend but I would hope they are treated and behave like any other student should. My point, and the point a lot of others are trying to make is that the board addressed this issue several years ago and did away with the policy. With all the issues facing our school district, I think if you and I were to make a list of priorities, these 11 students would not make the top 10 list. Capt. Carifi make it loud and clear the other night that expelling these 11 students, through no fault of their own, is his number one priority. I am not exaggerating when I write that Capt. Carifi's first motion as a newly elected board member was to have those 11 children removed from the school the very next morning. After some discussion, Capt. Carifi amended his idea to give the students until the end of the month.

Reply

David Comora

5:44 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Joan, Thanks for pointing out the perks that Mr. Carifi recieves as a police officer. It does seem a little odd that a generously rewarded township employee, like Mr. Carifi, wouuld target the perks of other township employees. Sort of like the pot calling the kettle black. Either way, this perk is being phased out. It seems rather cruel that Mr. Carifi would like to remove these children mid-year. I don't believe there is much incremental expense in keeping them for the balance of the year.

Reply
Comment_arrow

patchitup1

11:45 am on Saturday, January 12, 2013

This is funny, Capt. Carifi has a union job in town with dry cleaning, a town car, free gas, no insurance to pay, no car payments, no repairs to worry about, a fat retirement to look forward to & is talking about saving town people money? What about his pending law suit! Power & Greed is all Carifi knows

Maurice Saunders

6:06 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

What's interesting here as reported by a few people in this posting is that BOE dealt with this issue years ago by stopping the practice and then allowing the remaining 11 kids to finish up school in Parsippany. Was their an outcry then by anyone (resident or Board member) about allowing these 11 kids to continue to be educated here. WHY is this even an issue now!?!?! Let's focus on more important issues and let this "already in the books"issue alone as these kids will graduate within the next few years.

Reply

Greg

7:57 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Just because the BOE in previous years spent money like drunken sailors on administrative contracts/perks/lofty retirement packages, and turned a blind eye to Par-Troy taxpayers footing the bill to educate of nonresident students -- does not mean I, as a parent and taxpayer, want to keep to this status quo. NO money makes its way to the classroom teacher and busing regularly is cut for thousands of Par-Troy students who are residents-but we continuously fund for children who DON'T BELONG here. This is insanity at its best.

For those above who want to continue subsidizing out-of-district kids -- more power to you -- but you do NOT represent me and thousands of voters/taxpayers in this district. You keep paying, and I will support those who want to put a stop to it (and Ms. Cogan, who I voted for).

We are living in strenuous times of regular layoffs, furloughs, pay cuts and tax hikes. The backs of Par-Troy taxpayers CAN NOT withstand this insane BOE culture of footing out-of-district children's education. Mr. Carifi's approach may be a bit direct, but he is looking out for the kids and families of PARSIPPANY whose paychecks are under continuous threat of not making ends meet. All you "benefactors" better collectively wake up and smell the coffee -- dire fiscal times of today are directly related to past wreckless practices. I forecast regularly-rejected school budgets as all the taxpayers will have moved to districts will more sound fiscal policy.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Natalie Davis

8:16 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

No, there won't be regularly rejected school budgets. With the move to November elections, the public no longer gets to vote on budgets for the district.

friend of parsppany

8:11 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Where are all the talented adults in Parsippany? Come on out and get involved. The current board are ill-equipped to do what are in the best interests of children. Plain and simple there needs to be an upgrade. This board will be the laughingstock of Morris County. Why does Frank stay? I was told he tok care of his relatives. Is that true?

Reply

Student

8:12 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

I am a recent graduate of Parsippany High School (2011) and am now enrolled in a college. When I heard about what happened at this board of ed meeting, my heart sank. Not because of the policy Cariffi wishes to suspend, but because of the nonchalant way he did. That was wrong and egotistical, and I was in sheer disbelief. My issue with it is the fact that there are SO many things wrong with this school system right now that are affecting the STUDENTS. After all, they are the ones who go to these schools, not the board or the commentators on this website. Maybe the board should focus more attention on fixing the current problems with the administration or the fact that the high school is pretty much falling apart physically and less on their egos. In my opinion, NO ONE on the board seems to be competent enough to make decisions to improve the students' education and trust me, the students are far from happy. They should not be counting down the days til graduation.

One last thing. I have to say, everyone here who are googling people's names and degrading people in order to feel superior, regardless of your opinion, you are part of the problem. It's unbelievable that you all are parents-adults who have nothing better to do than trash each other on a community website. Maybe you should use that energy to go out and speak out against the issues you see with this board. Go to the meetings, vote, see to it that this doesn't happen again. It's your town- do something about it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

friend of parsppany

8:33 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Nice Job! You, out of all of us, is a voice of reason.

Par4theCourse

9:22 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Student,
That is without a doubt one of the best posts I've ever read on patch. You are certainly going places, and I thank you for your sincere, eye-opening, and heartfelt truth.

Reply

Greg

10:10 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

That is correct Natalie Davis. But the point here being: There will be a threshold reached when Par-Troy taxpayers are fed up and/or unable to shell out money to fund budgets which deny their resident-students initiatives and needs (i.e. more $$ to classroom teachers, busing, supplies) but yet subsizes nonresidents who again -- DO NOT BELONG in the district. Taxpayers will revolt in some form and/or just move out of district -- plain and simple. Then good luck funding these budgets on which the public no longer votes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

10:12 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Greg the policy you refer to was changed a few years ago look it up.

Patch_comments_icon

Natalie Davis

10:54 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

I get your point, Greg, and thank you for sharing it. Just pointing out a pertinent fact.

Student, thank you as well, though I wish you had shared your name. I would love to know the problems from your perspective. Please feel free to email me so we can chat. And good luck at school!

Reply

Beachdudeca

1:43 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I remember meeting the late great Millicent Fenwick, when attending Parsippany Hills, where she spoke about public service as a privilege, and that those who are elected that they have a responsibility to serve the greater good.
For the Board of Education to treat the 11 children as if they are criminals is beyond questionable, it is without conscious. These families represent .0015 % of the children enrolled in the district with a fiscal impact that is less then of a rounding error on most budget items.
It is my suggestion that the Board of Education, cease with hateful distracting policy changes, and instead address insuring that Parsippany deliverers a rich, and full education experience.

Reply

Scott Dean

9:50 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I think we should all take note from "Student"'s comments.all this is is a distraction for the real needs of our town schools. Put away the disdain because your candidate did not get in and embrace that somethings need to change.I am not saying you have to agree with how it was approached,My guess is these kids will be in school on Monday and for the rest of the year.
Let this new board come together and fix what is broken,I dont think anyone can deny that it needs fixing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

10:14 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

It already was fixed a few years ago. I agree people should get on with more important things.

Glen Lipkin

10:04 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

All i can say is "wow" just "wow". Not saying if I agree or not with the position but can we give the guy a meeting or two to break in. We have all started something new and I can guarantee the first attempt didn't please everyone. People here are more worried (sounds like jealous) of a person's title or salary. If you don't like what is happening; RUN FOR OFFICE- GET INVOLVED. Stop attacking someone's character just to make yourself feel better; especially with a "screen name".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol M.

10:39 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Mr Lipkin I don't think anyone would have thought twice about giving a guy a meeting or two to break in if his first action didn't involve hurting CHILDREN. What if no one had stopped him!!! Remember, he DEMANDED it get done. That's not breaking in, learning the ropes, getting acclimated, thats an attempt to make a major change with no regard for the impact he would have on children; that's what speaks to HIS character. There should be no learning curve tolerated at the expense of the well being of children and if he needs such a grand curve then sit, listen and LEARN not to harm children with your actions!

steve revette

10:05 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Student I totally agree. The fact of the matter is the board is oblivious to what really goes on in the schools which I've been saying for years. See the administration way of dealing with things is not dealing with them at all and pretend like they're going to go away on there own. When a teacher does something bad her opinion on what happened is the only one that matters.

Reply

Scott Dean

10:26 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Kevin, Im saying with all of the issues in the past 12 months ie: Contracts for Seitz,lawsuits,FOD back door meetings, Secret e-mails etc.. Your legience to the good ol boys of past is obvious.Let he or she who has never made a bad first impression be cast to the wolves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monica Sclafani

12:33 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Scott - so it's okay to ignore policy by demanding action be taken that evening because he's one of YOUR "good ol boys"? There are by-laws and policies in place that cover what a Board member can do and how he should do it. Perhaps Mr. Carifi should have done his homework or, at the very least, asked another Board member how to go about making the changes he wants. DEMANDING immediate action be taken and ignoring policy does not bode well for the future of this Board.

Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

2:07 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Trust me Scott. No allegiance to anyone from me. Especially regarding the issues that you now bring up. Go back and check my prior postings on these subjects.
Stop confusing the issue being discussed here and let's get the facts strait regarding these 11 kids.
You of all people should be able to understand the unfairness of what this issue is doing to those parents and their children and for what. Where's the gain? Just as your case with Par Troy West, there is none, just hurtful things.
As for the "Good old boys" I assume you are referring to Mancuso, Calabria and Orthwein ( my sister in law by the way just for full disclosure ). You need to take a look at the other people involved, four of whom are incumbent, and I believe we will run into the same problems created when Mancuso was president and was ramming all the things thru that you bring up.
Three years ago when I was railing against Mancuso being re-elected the voters chose to put him back on the Board. So if you did your homework you would realize my interest is only what I believe is best moving forward. Capt. Carifi needs to get a chance but his first actions really make me wonder. If this board ends up with a split majority and they don't work together to fulfill their obligation to education and allow these sideshows to continue. We will pay when your property values drop because the school system is in total disarray. So please don't go making accusations until you know the truth.

steve revette

10:40 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Kevin you'd be quite surprised but children of ALL Staff members do sometimes get Treated differently but not just for the good but for bad too. Like if I made a mistake growing up alot of teachers would be like Why can't you be more like Michael or Danielle my older siblings who were very well respected by the teachers and administration. Trust me you can say it isn't there but I know for a FACT that it is there but it's not just good things there are bad that come with that territory too. I'm not saying Teachers of kids could get away with murder. The penalty might not be as severe or it might even be more severe then other students.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

2:32 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Steve, I understand your position and favoritism from teachers has always been around. I was referring to Gordon Rizzuto's assumption that this is specifically happening for these 11 kids. I was trying to point out that he is making assumptions and is off the topic and he needs to stop trying to confuse the issue. I meant no offense.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Natalie Davis

3:59 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

My children's father and I used to teach in a Catholic school in Baltimore—different sitch because no tax dollars were involved. Part of the pay (very low) was that our kids were able to attend school there. It made survival possible. At the same time, also in Maryland, they had the same policy in effect as the archdiocese; if you taught in a school zone or district in which you didn't live, your kids could attend school in that zone or district. It was done in the interest of putting children and families first. I do not know if that policy still exists, but it did at least until we left Maryland. There was a time when compassion, whether some believe it appropriate or not, was part of the equation. I suspect that the economy no longer allows that luxury. But in relation to your point, Steve, I recall when my son was in kindergarten. He was treated terribly by his teacher because he was Jeff's kid. And David was the best-behaved kid in the class; still is, now, at 16. For the record, he does not attend school in the district in which his mother works and where she does not live, but in the district in which his father legally resides.

Comment_arrow

clyde donovan

4:29 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

I don't have any problem with teachers putting their kids in the school system where they teach, but the school systems where the teachers live should pay the receiving school district, in this case Parsippany, for the cost of educating the children.

Comment_arrow

steve revette

11:19 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Thank you Natalie. Exactly my point. It wasn't fair to your child that he didn't get treated fairly. And I like alot of Teachers in the school district who may or may not effected by this but I can't have SYMPATHY for teachers anymore. I was once a student and I was always respectful to all my teachers. Well a teacher did something to me that changed my life forever that I remember whole heartedly to this day. Did teachers come and stick up for me?

Bob Crawford

12:23 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I attended the BOE meeting last Thursday evening and wanted to take some time to reflect upon what I saw and heard at that meeting, Having done so I wanted to share my thoughts from the perspective of having served on the BOE for seven years.
(1) Mr. Carifi has a lot to offer but a lot to learn. Though used to and comfortable in a command and control structure Mr. Carifi needs to understand that the BOE moves forward by reaching a consensus that still respects the viewpoints of the minority. Policy and process are the mechanisms by which change is brought about and campaign pledges are tested and kept. Unilateral edicts won't stand the test of time and will rob the BOE's decision making process of alternative and valuable viewpoints.
(2) Mrs. Cogan should be given every consideration to be named as the ninth BOE member. Her tenacity (has run twice) her genuine interest (regularly attends BOE meetings), her perspective (as a parent) and her financial skills make her unique among the individuals who will be asking for the opportunity to serve on the BOE. If selected she must stay true to her obligation to independently serve the entire Parsipany community regardless of the position her running mate and/or BOE supporters might take.
(3) The 11 students who have been grandfathered in should be allowed to continue their studies in the Parsippany school system. When that practice was ended by a prior Board that was the agreement reached and it should be honored.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monica Sclafani

12:56 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Bob - EXCELLENT POST - Thank you!

Bob Crawford

1:04 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

(4) The issue of the 45-50 students proves that the current student enrollment review process works. As I understood the answer provided by the Administration at the BOE meeting, the families of all of the 45-50 students were able to provide the required documentation when asked to do so. Exploring options to better partner with the municipality to ensure that students being educated on the tax payers dime meet residency requirements is worth considering but needs to be done rationally and fairly.
(5) The dynamics of the BOE changed radically with the election of President Golderer and Vice President Shamsudin and those who were in the minority on the BOE are now in leadership roles. The responsibilities that go with those roles are formidable
(6) Mrs. Golderer is to be commended for her willingness to take on the heavy responsibility of serving as President which will consume much of her time during the next 12 months. She deserves the time to learn on the job and needs the support and advice from more experienced Board members including Mr. Strumolo, Dr. Calabria and Mrs.Orthwein. Mrs. Golderer will need their support to succeed if the Board is to have any chance of backing away from the teetering cliff it is currently perched on.
(7) The year is new and yet the Parsippany BOE at its first meeting in 2013 looked and sounded like the BOE of yesteryear. It is time to move on and it is time to move forward
(8) Best wishes and good luck

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Brancato

2:43 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Best thing you posted in a long time. You hit the nail on the head. I hope they are paying attention.
Happy New Year

Reality Checker

1:38 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

We have no children but can honestly say that living in Parsippany is getting worst in the few short years we have been here. Pull up the ranking of Parsippany's shools on Greatshools.org and see how they compare to some of the areas and I would say that Parsippany BOE is falling down on the job. The lack of structure, organization and agenda by Parsippany BOE is almost as bad as the townships desire to allow zoning changes to slap cheap housing in Intervale and behind the Irish restaurant on 46. I came from an area in PA where all the schools were ranked 9s and 10s (Wilson School district in Berks county PA) and here schools are ranked 5-7 yet taxes are double... I expect excellence for the money I spend -- I am not voting someone into office because they are a Democrat or Republican or were previously a cop or firefighter. I am voting the best person in to get the job done -- while I don't want to pay to educate kids from outside of our tax base I do want my neighbor's kids to get the best education possible. We spend a heck of a lot of money or artificials turfs but judging by the test scores on Greatschools.org I would say that Parsippany is far behind where I came from in Wilson schools in (Berks county PA) and those kids are going to be better prepared for a future. Also since I am paying double what I was back there I am just wondering where all the money is going... The corruption here is simply unbelievable but nobody wants to deal with it - ethics anyone?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Todd M. Finchler

2:08 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Let me get this straight. You have no kids in the district - so you have no direct relationship with any of the schools to form your own opinion. I attended Parsippany schools K-12 - and have two children in the school system now.

And you've been in town for only "a few shorts years." I have lived in town from 1970-93 and then 2000-present.

And you've repeatedly cited ratings from a web site - and have decided to adopt their ratings as your own as to the quality of our schools?

Why not look at how greatschools.org determines its own numerical ratings. Look at the FAQ section of its own web site. Its ratings are based exclusively on one year's worth of standardized testing data. Not based on anything else. Its own web site cautions users that states may use more comprehensive criteria in evaluating schools. Hmmm.... Wonder why?

I will leave it to others to ascertain whether one year of test results - alone - should determine whether a school district is meeting the needs of its student body. I would also note that most of the elementary schools in town are rated 8 out of 10, so I guess by your logic, the school system succeeds only K-5 and then starts to miserably fail students when they get into high school.

If you wish to attack my argument, feel free. You are anonymous, so don't attack me, please. (This should be a disclaimer that everyone uses when a pseudonym is involved.)

Scott Dean

2:53 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Kevin, my apologies for lumping you in as I have not gone back to see your previous comments.And I do not agree doing anything with the eleven but letting them finish out there school years if thats what it is,as you said fair is fair.
I just hope people realize how broken this BOE was and give it more than 48 hours to see changes.

Reply

Alan C

6:19 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Todd M. Finchler--So what if taxpayers don't have children in the district and are recent residents. Their opinions, input and hard-earned tax dollars (that help pay for your kids' education) are well appreciated in this township. And "Reality Checker" is not too off-base for the little time they have been here.

As a parent, taxpayer and real estate exec. who uses and monitors "great-schools dot-org" regularly, information derived from this website is often backed by other school ranking agencies.

I respectfully request you worry less about the pseudonyms being used and more about school rankings and its real effect on preparing our children for the future (or lack thereof) and property values.

"Great school dot org" ranks Par-Troy Hills 7 out of 10 and Par-High ranks 5 out of 10. This troubling evidence of long-term educational disparity within district and decline on the east side of township (post-2006) is reinforced by NJ Monthly's biannual ranking of Top 100 High Schools as follows:

2012 - Par-High 86, Par-Troy Hills 23
2010 - Par-High 84, Par-Troy Hills 50
2008 - Par-High 104 (not even in the top 100), Par-Troy Hills 87
2006 - Par-High 84, Par-Troy Hills 87

Homeowners/property investors on the east side of town should be quite concerned because property values are tied into these school ratings (Todd won't be able to lobby for or ascertain more money for sellers just because he has lived here since the '70's, LOL).

Reply

Todd M. Finchler

7:57 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Dear Real Estate Executive:

You continue to monitor that web site and what it says about PHS and PHHS.

I will continue to monitor my children, their teachers and the schools.

Believe it or not - school is what you make of it. Those students who work hard and learn will succeed - even despite what that web site may say.

But when someone comes onto this forum to belittle our school system - with no kids enrolled, little time here and based on extremely weak empircal evidence - I shall point that out in defense of our school system. And I shall do so with my full given and surnames.

Maybe you can send your post to all homeowners on the east side along with your business card to see if people will be lining up to list with you, so they can move to somewhere rated as an 8 or 9 by that web site.

(I learned a lot about sarcasm as a literary tool at PHS!)

Reply
Comment_arrow

friend of parsppany

9:50 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

They pay school taxes. Relax. Enough with the 11 students. They main issue is that the intelligence level of the Board should be a concern to the taxpayers. I don't care what issue is brought up-they will struggle with it. Yes, there is a difference betwen Par High and the hills looking at the data.

Alan C

10:03 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Take a deep breath Todd M. Finchler. That sarcasm you learned at PHS is getting you nowhere. Giving full names while speaking in the abstract provides no credibility to your argument.

You were called out on the facts. If you don't like them, call the entities that generate them, don't blame the people who monitor and invest around them. Your assumption that I sell houses is also misguided -- your school-learned "sarcasm as a literary tool" appears not to have you seeing straight.

Absolutely, school is what you make of it. However, every parent on the east side of town should have been (since 2008) and be putting the heat on the BOE to close the gap on this long-term, student-performance disparity between the two high schools. Instead, the BOE was overpaying for administrators, forcing students to pay for some school supplies, reducing busing while footing the education bill for nonresident students' who shouldn't be here in the first place.

New residents like "Reality Checker" resonably are looking for more data-driven results for their hard-earned taxpaying dollar and property investment, it was not to belittle the school district. Again breathe in Todd, keep the sarcasm in check, and your reading comprehension skills may improve.

Good Night Todd.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Angelina

9:08 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Love this! you tell him!

Reality Checker

11:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Todd -- glad you have been here a long time. I can't say we intend to stay that long and already assessing other options. Property values are dropping in this town and with the performance at on the BOE side of thing and town officials looking to expand the rental market and increase congestion this is looking more like a future Dover (but that is our observation recently) . When commercial ventures don't perform well in this town they just influence your officials to rezone and sell slums and add to the congestion -- or take bribes like back in 2002 (isn't that the NJ way). I don't see my wife and I looking to support that tax base for long. You can sit there and live in the past or look at the recent trend and be concerned. If you are concerned -- you can do something to make it better, do nothing at all or move (that is really your 3 choices when it boils down to it). In our case option 3 is looking pretty appealing at the moment.

Reply

Reality Checker

11:38 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Todd -- one other thing I have an above average 5 figure tax bill that supports these schools and as a taxpayer and property owner I expect excellence and as a taxpayer contributing towards the schools in this town I would expect that my tax dollar give me some say. Excellence in schools is good for crime, it is good for property resale values (both important to town residents with and without kids) and it is good for hopefully those sticking around in the area for the future genreation to have a decent education to make sound decisions and earn a decent living to be able to continue helping make the community strong. But hey we aren't parents so we shouldn't care with those 10,000+ in property taxes and five figues + of state and local taxes go.

Reply

Todd M. Finchler

7:58 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I respect both of your absolute right to use whatever data is available to you to evaluate our local schools. (No sarcasm here.) I have different data available since I have children in the school system, because I interact with hundreds of children and parents in local youth sports programs and because I was a product of these same schools, so I have a different frame of reference. We could debate the merits of standardized tests scores as being the barometer of educational excellence, but that would take us even further astray from the original topic of this argument.

I wish you both well.

Reply

David Comora

12:34 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

FYI - Regarding After thoughts on your posts...Its best to think through your posts completely and make your edits prior to posting as all of your edits are emailed to everyone...Ange, I didn't realize this until I just received 3 or 4 versions of your latest post....

Reply

steve revette

8:02 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Fact of the matter is we don't know if Money would be saved by taking the kids out. Also guys we can ALL have a chat and be respectful of one another's opinion without yelling at each other. Everybody has a right to their opinion whether we agree with it or not. For those people saying it wouldn't save money we don't know that for sure. I would Like to RESPECTFULLY point out that we don't know who the 11 kids are. However as I have been sutdying the law for the last 5 years or so Special needs kids do cost more to educate. If one of those eleven kids Has in his IEP(Individual Educational PLan) That he needs to have a 1 to 1 aide then they HAVE to give it to him they don't have the option so in that sense you can say that they would save money. Also a lot of kids who have special needs may also have Transportation privlidges and Gas and drivers do not pay themselves. Come on guys we're neighbors there is no reason why we can't ALL be respectful to one another.

Reply

David Comora

9:05 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Steve, with all due respect...and you know I respect you... Its not going to cost any more to keep these kids in school for the rest of the year. These people are under contract for the year. They are not going to...and they cannot fire a special education teacher because a couple kids move out of town in the middle of the year. This really is a load of nonsense and hopefully the individual who tried to cut his teeth on this issue has learned his lesson and will go on to become a more productive and compassionate member of the board.

Reply

Mike

9:47 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Why are they talking about special ed. That's why they brought special ed. back because it's cheaper to teach them at the district level instead of sending them to out of district schools. If you start taking kids out of schools I think the state starts taking money from the system because of lower enrollment.

Reply

Donald

10:45 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Four days of reading everyone missing the main point, it's not removing kids but holding people accountable for improper spending. Why is everyone so focused on Carifi's profession, are you all that afraid of Police Officers. He is not holding the kids responsible but the people that put us in this predicament. Why hasn't anyone looked to Calabria for answers, he was there when this policy started. The public is tired of Seitz, Calabria, and Orthwein masking their remarks through other people. Seitz and Calabria are cheered by Sclafani, Orthwein remarks through her nephew, Kevin Brancato and let's not forget Carol M. who many know her as Debbie Orme. Let's stop this nonsense and focus on the real issues like the fields, test grades/rankings, teacher's contracts and repairs. Let's support this change in the board because it's obvious Dr. Calabria's 30 plus years experience how cost our children greatly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol M.

11:43 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I’m not sure where you came up with that one Donald but feel free to keep exercising that vivid imagination of yours. And Mr Carifi may be trying to hold someone responsible but he is punishing the children along the way and that’s never the way to initiate change.

Comment_arrow

Sick of the trolls

11:08 am on Monday, January 14, 2013

Yeah, so "Donald," if the BOE members are using others to make their comments, which BOE member are you? Maybe if you made your libelous accusations under your real name, we would know. Of course, you'd probably have your pants sued off, but at least you wouldn't be a gutless troll.

steve revette

11:30 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Mr. Comora The respect goes both ways and I respect you and your entire family as well. What I was saying I wasn't talking about getting rid of teachers in anyway. Let's just say that for example 10 out of the 11 kids are in special education and each of them Have their own aid who is making 15 thousand dollars a year. That's 150 thousand dollars right there and that is not something that can be compromised if it's in their IEP. As wierd as it sounds the superintendent nor the board controls how many Paraprofessionals get hired The IEP team at each of the schools really does. I never said I was for kicking them out in the middle of a school year but at the same time I never said I was against having them leave after the school year was finished. Also at the same time and I'm not just talking about for Schools but for everything I just don't like the idea of Grandfathering in because it could just create even MORE controversy. Now a friend of mine pointed out something really interesting. Who decides what school the child goes too? I mean I went to eastlake because of where I lived. Does the (parentA.K.A teacher) decide or do they have to go where ever their is a spot available or does the super intendent decide? Also, I have nothing against any of these kids and believe they should ATLEAST be allowed to finsih out the year.

Steve Revette

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Brancato

8:02 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Mr. Revette,

You said: "Let's just say that for example 10 out of the 11 kids are in special education and each of them Have their own aid who is making 15 thousand dollars a year. That's 150 thousand dollars..."

You're using a hypothetical situation to make your point, but it's not helping your argument. For starters, we don't know what year the children are in, or how they're distributed throughout the district. We have 14 schools and we're only talking about 11 children among 7,300 or so. It's much more likely that we're talking about one maybe two children less per school than removing an entire class, much less a class of special ed kids. Frankly, I would be surprised if there was even one of the 11 who were in a special ed class. The point is that taking these children out of school will not effectively save the taxpayers of the Township any money, we will still be paying their teacher, we will still be heating that classroom, we will still be purchasing the textbook he or she would have used. The 2012-2013 school budget is $133 million, of which $117 million comes from our property taxes. According to the budget, that's about $14,000 per pupil. These are facts, which are freely available, and tell the real story: if you eliminate 11 pupils, your total cost does not go down, because you do not eliminate a class. But your cost per student goes up, because you're paying the same amount of money to have fewer students instructed.

steve revette

9:30 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Mr. Brancato the whole thing is really a hypothetical situation. I wasn't talking about getting rid of special education teachers or any teachers at all. All I'm saying is it isn't a fact that we wouldn't save money because if those kids are in special education and have a 1 to 1 aid we wouldn't need that one to one aid and we'd save money there. I know that eliminating a couple kids will not get rid of a teacher. To be perfectly honest it doesn't matter to me how the board goes about doing this I wouldn't lose sleep over seeing the kids stay or seeing the kids go. Also Mr. Brancato even teachers kids have special needs so we don't know. The odds of atleast 1 having special needs is pretty good. Also I'm not arguing anything because I agree with the mjaority that kicking them out is not a good idea and really the only thing I'm against is Grandfathering and that is for EVERYTHING. So I wasn't talking about getting rid of that teacher but we'd save money by getting rid of the aid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Brancato

10:03 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

With all due respect, Mr. Revette, what I'm trying to point out is that you don't know if there even IS an aid, so your argument is irrelevant at best, misleading at worst. I could argue that keeping these children in the school system actually makes us money because if they had a bake sale, that money could be used by the school. It doesn't mean that it's true. When you look at the facts, and not the "ifs", it's plain to see that grandfathering these children into the schools doesn't cost the taxpayer much, if anything at all. The monies are already being spent to educate our children, what difference does it make if these others get the education they were promised as well?

steve revette

11:46 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I'm not arguing with you and I AGREE with you that they should be allowed to stay. I don't mind paying the extra money if their is any so they can go to school here. But it's also not fair to say that the taxpayers ABSOLUTELY 100 percent for sure wouldn't save a penny when we don't know for sure because we don't know anything about these 11 kids. Let me say I agree that if we promised these kids they could go to school here then we owe it to them to follow through with our promise. However None of us can sit here and say for sure that money would or wouldn't be saved when we do NOT know ALL the facts about these eleven kids.

Reply

Scott Dean

5:50 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Update:Nor 11 or 55 kids have been forceably been removed from Parsippany Schools,It is fair to assume that Mr.Carifi's suggestion didnt warm to many hearts but realisticly asking the tough questions is finally being done.I think that is something to look forward to,who knows sooner or later this may help in another matter that may be more important to you. THe kids are fine and lets try to focus on the fact that solving issues starts with asking tough questions.

Reply

Roman Hoshowsky

11:15 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Well said Mr. Dean. For decades the buck has been passed, and things got swept under the rug, and fingers were pointed. Special favors were done for certain people and that's why we're in the current state of affairs.

Reply

Leave a comment