patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

School Lunch Strike Planned By Par Hills Students

Some students upset about getting less and paying more for the new reportedly healthier lunches being served in Par-Troy schools.

 

The new, reportedly healthier school lunch program being offered in township public schools is not receiving an enthusiastic welcome from many students at Parsippany Hills High School. Two students, upset over smaller portions and higher prices, aren't taking the matter lying down: They're organizing a strike.

"On Friday, we're asking everybody not to buy lunch or anything from the cafeteria," explained organizer Brandon Faris, a 17-year-old senior. "Nothing from the snack line, no water, no cookies. Not a dime will be spent in the cafeteria."

For the past week, Faris and junior Nicholas Caccavale have been handing out fliers and spreading the word. The duo has also launched a Facebook group, PPHS Lunch Strike (yes, the title contains a typo), that has more than 1,000 members.

"We want to raise awareness and let everyone know that this isn't right," he said.

The students are rearing up against the new program instituted at the start of this school year by Pomptonian Food Service.

Last June, Pomptonian introduced a new lunch program to the Parsippany Board of Education. The goal of the plan—which is mandated under the new Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, a federal law designed to address childhood obesity—is to encourage students to eat healthier lunches at school.

The district has no choice but participate in the program. School districts that do not comply can be levied fines.

Company president Mark Vidovich told the school board last summer that the goal of the program is to promote consumption of fruits and vegetables, to limit bread and meat portion sizes and to cut the amount of fat available in the standard school breakfast and lunch.

Vidovich announced then that because the plan focuses most heavily on costly fruits and vegetables, the law says that the minimum lunch price charged must be raised to $2.51 to cover the additional costs required.

Students are not forced to limit themselves in their food choices. However, if they want additional items, such as cheese to top a hamburger, they must pay extra for it.

Mandated or not, the new system is not winning favor with many students.

"For the past three years, lunch prices were significantly lower," Faris said. "This year, the price of the average lunch went from $2.50 to about $4. One sandwich can cost $4 or $4.50."

He explained that much of the increased cost comes from purchasing add-ons, such as cheese, snacks, beverages—and, for some, an additional sandwich.

"After they eat lunch, a lot of people go back to buy more, because they are still hungry," he said. "They want to actually be full when they finish eating."

Faris said he is hearing a lot of students—and teachers and staff members—say that they will brown bag it on Friday to ensure that the PHHS cafeteria does as little business as possible.

"Students say they would rather save their money," he said, adding that they can use the same money to buy food outside of school. "We'd get more food for their money by buying lunch somewhere else."

Faris said what he really wants to see is "an open campus at lunchtime, so if people want to get a sub or pizza outside of school, they can."

"We really would rather not pay a ridiculous price for not so great a lunch," he said. "We're in high school—we want a full meal."

Faris, who has lived in Parsippany since kindergarten and is planning to have a career in law enforcement, said he's getting nothing but positive reinforcement from the adults in his life.

"Teachers are saying they're proud of us," he said. "Same with my mom. She said she was proud and told me to go for it."

Patch awaits responses from district administration and Pomptonian.

Told of the forthcoming strike, Board of Education member Anthony Mancuso said the program was in place because it was mandated by law.

"We have to follow the law," he said.

However the powers that be feel, the students, said Faris, are stoked for the strike.

"Every day, more and more people have been added to the Facebook group. It's really growing," he said.

Related Topics: Education, Healthy Food, Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, PARSIPPANY HILLS HIGH SCHOOL, Schools, pomptonian, and school lunch strike

OnTheBeach

7:54 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Good Job Boys!

What about the kids that receive free\reduced lunch that get an even smaller portion and have to go to a different lunch line. Talk about making someone feel less than the others.....

Reply

OnTheBeach

7:56 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Very happy to see these young men take a stand for something they believe in.

Reply
Comment_arrow

KellyinBoston

8:14 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Oh, yeah, let's support kids eating fatty garbage for lunch. Good thinking.

Comment_arrow

deb knobelman

6:27 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

how lame is it that THIS is what they are taking a stand on. just look around, america is grossly overweight, and we will all pay for it with our $$$$ through insurance premiums and tax dollars when they get sick with heart disease, diabetes, and who knows what else.

PeoplesChamp

8:35 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Way to stand up to the evil people making you eat less sh&%$! so that maybe you'll live longer. geeze. The only thing that these kids should be fighting for is for the healthy ingredients/food in their lunch to be subsidized by taxes on crap like soda. If it's the price they're complaining about, then I can get behind it. But they are seemingly targeting the wrong issue.

Reply

Pete

9:10 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

What ever happened to "leave the table just a little bit hungry" ??

And as to an open campus at Hills, forget it !! There's no place within reasonable walking distance where you can buy food, so there would be an increase in car traffic, with kids rushing to get fed and get back to school in time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shawn Pound

7:33 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Hey pete, I guess you aren't from around here because there are several deli's and pizzeria. Just visit one when we have a half day and you'll see.

g

9:36 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

By 7 am senior Nick B...already had burned about 250 calories in the High School weight room.

He grabbed a bagel and a Gatorade afterward; if he eats before lifting, he gets sick.

That was followed by eight periods in the classroom, and then three hours of football practice. By the time he headed home, he had burned upward of 3,000 calories - his coach thinks the number is even higher.

But the calorie cap for his school lunch? 850 calories.

"A lot of us are starting to get hungry even before the practice begins," B... said. "Our metabolisms are all sped up."

Now you know why the kids are striking.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine

1:49 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Why can't he bring in his own lunch? I doubt the school forbids it.
Talk about spoiled! If it's not enough, bring in your own. If it's too expensive, bring in your own.

Comment_arrow

KellyinBoston

8:18 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

The problem is, most kids aren't playing football. That's why 1/3 of all American children are obese. 850 calores for lunch is a lot for most kids. And the kids playing sports are eating (a lot) on the side.

Comment_arrow

Liz

9:48 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

omg...do you honestly think that if a kid reaches 850 calories at lunch he/she can't have any more to eat? If Nick chooses to buy a school prepared meal, he can ask for seconds on fruits and vegetables, or he can buy something else. And if that's not enough, Nicky boy can bring snacks or his own food. Noone is starving these kids, wake up!

lynn magnusson

9:36 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

$2.50 for an apple and a sandwich sounds cheap. Can I eat here too?

Reply

Steven Colpar

9:46 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Kudos to these young patriots for standing up for their God-given right to eat massive quantities of belly-busting crap! The Founding Fathers would be proud! I hope they have banners “I want my Pink slime!” because healthy food is such a drain of taxpayer dollars. Mystery meat is so much cheaper. Fruits and vegetables – are you kidding me?

The bag lunch protest is spot on! Then they can eat a satisfying meal of all kinds of stuff – triple decker baloney and mayonnaise on good old America white bread – ymmm. And don’t forget the Yodels and Doritos!

The ultimate protest would be bringing in White Castle as a bagged lunch. A dozen cheeseburger and onion rings will do you just fine. Might have to cancel afternoon classes though.

Reply
Comment_arrow

g

3:57 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

How many high school kids have you seen who are pretty slim when they graduate.

How many of these kids ate belly busting crap.

How many of these same kids have you seen 10 to 15 years later and they are almost obese.

Was it the belly busting meals they ate in high school or is it the belly busting meals they ate after high school

Always blame the high school kids. They have no idea what is going on. LOL

Comment_arrow

Steven Colpar

9:47 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

I don’t stalk a lot of high school children “g” observing their physical characteristics. You got one up on me there. BTW - Has any of your data collection got you in trouble with the authorities?

You do have a point here. I completely forget about the magic reset button we press on the back of the kids necks at graduation which wipes clean all their bad habits, prejudices, and memories at high school graduation.

Comment_arrow

Dana Zukswert

10:07 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Steven-You are right-on with your comment! Only in america would a healthy lunch program have to be mandated to get the massive amount of obese kids to trim down & be healthy. And only in america would everyone protest such a thing. When I was in school you had the one or two overweight kids in class. how things have changed.

patch comments

10:42 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I think you missed thier point. They are upset that the healthy mandated lunch is smaller and more costly. If the size is reduced, the price should be reduced. In fact, it is a double price increase!

Reply
Comment_arrow

smct

12:19 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Healthy food cost more. Therefore, a healthy lunch will cost more. Have you not noticed that when they take the fat out of the food, the price goes up? Regular beef...$2/lb, 93% lean beef $4.99/lb...regular cheese food ( yea... its not cheese) $1.99...2% milk fat cheese food $4.99..and so it goes on!

steve revette

10:51 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

God job boys. Go to tabor pizzeria like I would do.

Reply

Niki Lipkin

11:13 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I think the kids shouldn't be mandated by the federal government on what they should & should not be eating (and having to pay for it). Big Brother is precariously close to telling you how to tie your shoes - and if you can! In the middle school (Brooklawn), the price of lunch has increased and the portion sizes have decreased. They also charge kids EXTRA money if they do not take a piece of fruit! My kids eat fruit, but they will not eat the fruit at school because they say every single kid has their hands all over the pieces of fruit & it is disgusting to them. So every day, they pay more money for a piece of fruit they refuse to pick up and don't get. That makes sense? That's helping our kids to be healthier? C'mon, that's simply ridiculous!

Reply

Jonathan Lombardo

11:48 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Only a matter of time before 'big G' Government slaps parents fines for allowing their children to bring in lunches they deem unacceptable. Think it can't happen? Bloomberg soda ban, anyone? FLOTUS? What ever happened to self-governance, self-reliance? I'm sure the school would appreciate a fruit basket in your name.
I support the voices of these young adults who are speaking out IN A PEACEFUL MANNER. These young men (and young women who equally support the message) clearly thought out a plan in which they could voice their frustrations with restrictions in the cafeteria in a legal, orderly fashion. And you know what? It is getting attention.
PeoplesChamp, you want to slam them for taking action in this manner? I think by 'popular vote' we can say you demonstrated the least responsible message yet. You seem pretty angry and foul-mouthed towards the next generation who appreciate their freedom of speech and right to peaceful protest. People might take what you have to say with some relevance if you put your pitchfork away and join the debate with a little sensibility.. Just sayin'.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nicholas Skroumbelos

10:25 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

I (burp) totally agree (belch) with you on this (was that you or me?) stance.
Ain't NOBODY (phew that was a big one!) gonna tell me how to eat!

clyde donovan

11:57 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

It seems to me that if Brandon and Nick don't like the lunches at school, they can get off their lazy ***** and make their own lunches to bring to school.

It's time to remove all school lunch programs from Parsippany schools as a cost saving measure. Let the parents supply a bag lunches for their children . If the parents aren't willing to do that - or their children are to lazy to make a sandwich - turn them over to DYFS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maurice Saunders

4:17 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Clyde, you know that doesn't make any sense...what's your next suggestion as cost saving measure to eliminate schools in Parsippany and let parents home teach their kids...if their they are too lazy - turn them over to DYFS.

Comment_arrow

clyde donovan

11:31 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Maurice, that's actually a good idea. There's nothing in the federal constitution that requires government to educate children. It would be a stretch to claim states have the right to establish schools under the 10th amendment.

Comment_arrow

Chris

1:40 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Not for nothing Clyde but as a PHHS student, you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. Brandon and Nick are both Healthy kids and are fit. Neither of them are lazy, and both did make their lunches Friday. Also, its not just Brandon or Nick that had something to say about the school lunch prices, about 1,247 kids and counting agree with Brandon and Nick. So before you go insulting kids, think twice.

Anna Marie Weiss

11:58 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

It's easy for adults who exercise freedom of choice on a regular basis to be sarcastic about this. This is the result of a federal policy the Obama administration signed, the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids act. It reduces serving sizes on grains & proteins, increases serving sizes on fruits and veges along with many other changes, it also mandated a price increase. The state power point presentation says this will cure lachanophobia - "the intense fear about vegetables" - I couldn't make this up! For students to avoid ala carte pricing they must take the fruits and veges even if they will just throw them out. Deliveries are not allowed at the school and students are not allowed to leave campus. Bottom line is pay more for less or brown bag it. While the desire to have a healthy population is admirable, in my opinion this is too far. There was already regulation in place that during school hours no soda, candy, or other food without nutritional value could be served. The end result is more food is going in the garbage, I am spending more at shop rite, and cafeteria workers are having their hours cut and being threatened with lay-offs because the sales are not there. Unfortunately our BOE and food service provider have no choice but to comply, this is federal. I applaud the student body for their efforts - but to have any impact beyond their school it needs to be Nationwide and parents have to get involved too. Informational link http://www.pomptonian.com/press.htm

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine

1:50 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

"Deliveries are not allowed at the school and students are not allowed to leave campus..." What about making & bringing their own lunches in? They DON'T have to buy school lunches.

Comment_arrow

Anna Marie Weiss

2:31 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

@ christine - next sentence after quote you replied to "bottom line is pay more for less or brown bag it." Also, if you had read completely you would have read that I do brown bag for MY children. This limits options, but it is MY decision. The point is that this is all a federal government mandate that as a parent I feel is beyond necessary and intrusive.

Comment_arrow

smct

12:24 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

I have always brown bagged my kids lunches. Our schools did not offer lunch and i agree... active kids need more food! My kids are extremely active and I prepare lunches with a lot of protein, fruit and healthy snacks. I also have them take a reusable water bottle so they can fill it anywhere and always have it with them. They shove protein bars, granola bars and other snacks for afterschool.

Anna Marie Weiss

12:07 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

http://www.pomptonian.com/press.html
The BOE contracts with a food service company, I believe that at least until this year they made a profit on the lunch program. The employees are hired by the contracted company and not BOE employees. The BOE owns and maintains the equipment. This contract goes out for bid every few years.

Reply

patchitup1

12:16 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Great start kids! The United states of America is NOT a socialist country! We are FREE to say, Do And Eat what we please! Pack your own lunch filled with what ever you want to eat. This is a horrible example of how Obama is changing our way of living. Let the kids PLAY more in gym class and sports to fight obesity.

Reply
Comment_arrow

schabadoo

10:48 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

These lazy kids won't pack their own lunch and need the school to give them whatever they want.

Great to see you stand up for these lazy socialists!

g

12:38 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

George Bernard Shaw speaking of the Socialist Utopia, he said: "Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not.

If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well."

SO STUDENTS BEFORE YOU STRIKE,REMEMBER YOU MIGHT BE EXECUTED IN A KINDLY MANNER.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Colpar

1:41 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

You are so right g. We conservatives have the God-given right to be as dumb as we want! “Ignorance is bliss” so by that measure our pursuit of happiness is being infringed on by these socialist libs!

Comment_arrow

g

4:22 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Steven, who came up with this idea? Was it one person forcing his/her idea on the rest of us?

I guess if you follow the ideas of one persons, you must be awfully bright.

Comment_arrow

Steven Colpar

9:55 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

I am awfully bright sir/ma’am… as evidence the lengthier collection of vowels and consonants in my name. It was nice of your parents to make it easy for you. But hey – we’re on the same side here compadre. I too am fearful and will fight with every last breath that socialist puppet master that wants to take the place of our responsible parents and stop them from their god-given right to allow their kids to eat unhealthy things! Freedom! Freedom!

Comment_arrow

Dana Zukswert

10:23 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Looking at a cross-section of today's kids, that wouldn't be any loss.
Youth really is wasted on the young.

Arline Amaducci

1:00 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

This is the federal government stepping into every aspect of our lives. They need to mandate what our kids eat for lunch, because we are to stupid to do it ourselves! I applaud these kids. So, who are YOU voting for in November?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Colpar

1:44 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Why – the person that allows me the freedom to be as dumb as I want Arline – me (write-in vote)! It was either me or that Socialist ex-governor of Massachusetts that gave everyone healthcare. What a Stalinist Statist.

Comment_arrow

Jeff

8:09 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Agreed they are stepping in. Arline -- I definitely think you understand the argument of why a mandate was necessary (because we weren't doing it ourselves). Regardless - have a double check as to who voted for it. Based on wiki -- this went thru the Senate with a by unanimous voice vote on August 5, 2010. Your issue therefore is with both the Republicans and Democrats.

Comment_arrow

Steven Colpar

9:57 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Jeff you discount the Democrats’ secret ventriloquism weapon on Senate voice votes. Oh yeah… don’t think we don’t know…. We’re on to these Freedom haters.

Beth Bluj

3:53 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I applaud these boys and their efforts. They are conducting themselves in a mature way to state their dissatisfaction with something they deem unfair.
The government has absolutely no business on telling you, me, your kids or my kids what they can and cannot eat or drink.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

8:00 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I too applaud these boys for their efforts. However, government is intrusive in many aspects of our lives. Alcohol and tobacco are only available to those 18/21 and older who are felt mature enough to make adult decisions. Unfortunately, obesity is an epidemic and has many health risks. For too long our waist lines have increased and although we hope that our children will make healthly choices -- it is hard to expect it when bad food choices are plenty available and targetted to them. Still my only issue is that the cost went up by an crazy amount and that the amount of food provided is limited leaving some to be hungry. This aspect should be reviewed -- however - it is school objective for children to learn and learning to eat healthly is not wrong.

Scott Dean

4:32 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Im with you Beth, Believing treatment is unfair is a good reason to stand up and be heard. Hopefully they dont get suspended from school for this.

Reply

Mike

5:24 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Doing just a one day boycot won't do too much. They will throw out what they don't use and save and serve on Monday what they can. The best would be to boycot for a few days and then boycot a few days every week. They still have to stock the kitchen but won't know what days the students are boycotting.

I don't think that you can suspend a student because they don't eat the cafe food. Just don't do anything like holding up picket signs and causing a disturbance. Just bring in a lunch and go to the cafe and eat it.

Reply

Irony Never Sleeps

9:00 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

What an Ironic news day!

Par Hills students stage a Lunch Strike because they’re paying more money for less food one day after Smashburger celebrates its’ grand opening just a few miles away.

Irony or Opportunity?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

1:46 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Neither, smashburger on 46 in Parsippany was scheduled to open the September 27 a few months back back, way before the strike was supposed to happen. But it is funny how it fell into place like that.

g

10:36 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

A newly released survey of high school students said 28 percent reported being obese or overweight, up from 23.5 percent in 2003.

Why is it that 72% of the high schol students who are not considered obese or overweight must suffer because of the 28%?

A skinny student wants to know why he is being forced to eat the same menu what obese children are forced to eat.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Colpar

11:24 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Wow g – this is ground breaking! Then the “obesity epidemic” reported by the liberal media is really just a self-image problem. That changes everything. You’re right – why should kids who think they’re skinny suffer because of the ones that undeniably know they’re fat!

ParResident

11:18 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

I would like to go back to comment #1 from "On the Beach" The free and reduced must go on a seperate line? How appaling is that!!! Must the entire school know who's family is having a tough time making ends meet? Should be a HIPAA rule against that. As for the strike, Great Job Boys!! If you look in the dumpsters after school, i'm sure you will find all the fruits and vegetables that did not sell. Maybe they should stop selling french fries deep fried in oil and come up with some creative nutritious way of doing french fries, maybe baked? Stop selling the snapple and gatorades, which are full of High Fructose Corn Syrup. Eating healthy doesn't have to be painful OR expensive. Maybe rethinking on how to prepare the meals would be better. As for the additional cost! Who's pocket is that going into?

Reply

g

11:44 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Steve colpar, I have no idea what you are tallking about in your post of 11:24.a.m.

I didn't say kids who think they are skinny , I said a skinny student wants to know.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Colpar

12:13 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

(g 10:36 am) "A newly released survey of high school students said 28 percent reported being obese or overweight, up from 23.5 percent in 2003."
Let's break it down "survey said" "28 percent reported" (that is "students" reported - or "self-assessed" themselves as obese).

Beth Bluj

1:17 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Makes no difference - government should not be telling us what we can/cannot eat.
It is up to parents to parent, schools to teach, and government to govern - not dictate.
If the government is so concerned about obesity maybe they should be funding more after school programs, more sports programs in schools, and more work out facilities in schools.

Reply
Comment_arrow

schabadoo

7:14 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

No one is telling them what they can/cannot eat. They can bring a lunch.

Not complicated.

g

2:19 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Steve Colpar,

Report: One-Third of U.S. Children Are Overweight or Obese
By Bryan Toporek on July 11, 2011 11:53 AM

More than one-third of U.S. children between ages 10-17 are considered obese (16.4 percent) or overweight (an additional 18.2 percent), according to a report Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader released last week by the Trust for America's Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. That percentage has nearly tripled in the past 10 years, according to former Surgeon General David Satcher.

Reply

Steven Colpar

2:59 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

G - (I’ll throw you some kudos by capitalizing) Thank you for clarifying your citation (by cutting and pasting a completely different article)….

http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/schooled_in_sports/2011/07/report_one-third_of_us_children_are_overweight_or_obese.html

See you alarmist liberals? There’s no problem here. The obesity rate only tripled in the past ten years. BTW – in my day Sears called these kids “husky”.

But G – re: last paragraph “The writers of the report make six key recommendations about how to reduce the prevalence of obesity in the U.S., including expanding the amount of physical activity in school and in out-of-school programs, ensuring that all food and drinks sold in schools meet or exceed the most recent Dietary Guidelines for Americans, and reducing youths' exposure to the marketing of unhealthy foods.”

What the heck G? More big government? When will it end?

Reply

schabadoo

5:33 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Do these kids not know that they're allowed to bring your own lunch?

How lazy is the football player to go into school early, burn over 3000 calories, but not pack a lunch? Shouldn't he be on a special diet with that sort of regimen?

What a bunch of whiners. I went to the Hills-the lunch they offered was awful pizza or the hoagie.

Reply

The Good Guy

8:33 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

The solution: Brown bag it. I've been doing it since high school because my parents couldn't afford to give me money to buy lunch. I do it today and save over $1000 a year on lunch money.

Also, my food is MUCH MUCH more healthier than the garbage that is served by eating out and I don't have to worry about some nasty cook or waiter spitting in my food. I also know my food is fresh.

Brown bag it guys and all will be good! Get in the habit now. You'll never regret it and never go back.

Reply

Liz

1:58 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

NEWS FLASH: Kids Thinks School Lunches Suck (hahaha)

Reply

Liz

2:05 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

That's right kids! Make your own lunches and stick it to the man! While you're at it...throw some carrot sticks in there and a bottle of water...perhaps a piece of grilled chicken leftover from dinner your mom made? You'll be fuller, happier and not quick as fat. VIVA REVOLUTION!

Reply

Liz

2:13 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Oh yeah...and for those of you complaining about the gov telling your kids to eat...you do realize that you have a choice? Instead of giving your kid money to buy lunch you could teach your teen to make a healthy lunch for themselves. It's really not that hard...grocery stores sells these little bags of carrots and green stuff called lettuce that's all chopped up for you. Oh yeah, and I heard bananas are quite portable.

Reply

Elizabeth Cox

8:00 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012

We have pomptonian in our district and its gross. My son said it was good for about 3 months. They it was gross. The veggies were mushy, the food had no taste- my child has a great palate so I was surprised when he complained. We don't buy anymore from them. They raised prices and lowered there standards. Good luck boys!

Reply

smct

12:30 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

If you really want to trim the waistlines of our youth.. GET RID OF VIDEO GAMES, COMPUTERS, CELL PHONES...GET THEM OUTSIDE! Get kids moving again. I was never a fan of these types of entertainment mostly because these are stealing our time, focus and means of communicating with peers. NO reduced calorie lunch or longer gym period will help kids become healthier if they go home to sedentary lives filled with crappy snacks lovingly bought my mom.

Reply

OnTheBeach

3:43 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

@ ruckus ding me - yes you are correct about healthy foods costing more. But in this case they did not switch to lean meats its the same pink slim. The cheese is an extra charge.

The protein portion is small and fruit & veg portion is larger. When I do grocery shopping my meats always cost more than the produce.

So how dare they increase the price with a smaller portion size.

Reply

Leave a comment