VIDEO: Christie Rips 'Callous' House Republicans
Governor rips GOP: There is 'one group to blame for the continued suffering of these innocent victims, the house majority and their speaker, John Boehner.'
Governor rips GOP: There is 'one group to blame for the continued suffering of these innocent victims, the house majority and their speaker, John Boehner.'
.
Advertise on Patch and reach potential customers in your backyard and beyond. Click here for more information.
Learn more »
If you want to help local causes, or your cause needs local help, your next click should be right here.
Learn more »
You’re now signed up!
Enter your tip here and it will be sent straight to Natalie Davis, Editor Ariana Cohn-Sheehan, Editor Jake Remaly, Rebecca K. Abma, Contributor Frank Giasone, and Eric Goodman, Parsippany Patch's (incredibly grateful) editors.
Ridgewood Mom
8:32 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Amen. Shame on Scott Garrett.
Its time we expunge the wingnuts from the Republican party, who are destroying the party's credibility and popular success.
Outing the enemies of hurricane assistance is a great place to start in weeding out the worst elements that are consuming the party, and that are holding our great republic hostage.
Ridgewood Mom
8:35 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013
http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/aronsohn_122012.html
buffymcbuffy
11:27 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Why should any Republican vote for 600 million more money for the EPA? The Government should not be in the business of insuring anyone. The EPA everyone seems to love in NJ should prevent everyone from rebuilding near water unless they have enough money to pay for there own damage. If the Government didn't provide flood insurance I'm sure NO one would have built homes near the ocean. Don't blame the Republicans, blame everyone who put the pork in the bill. If it's for disaster relief there should be NO PORK ADDED.
I plead the 2nd!
1:13 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
So he has concerns that there is wasteful spending in the aid bill. what do you want him to do? sign it anyway?
R.Decastro
7:50 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
This bill has $24 billions in pork money not related to Sandy victims. Republicans or Democrats, It is stupid to vote for this bill when the country is broke. More power to Scott Garrett.
Ridgewood Mom
8:38 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013
The idea that Scott Garrett just wants to cut pork is a diversion. This is about not wanting to pay disaster assistance, period. He has a long demonstrated history on the matter. He might also not like spending on other things that he calls pork either, but this is a case of opposing spending, regardless of need, as a generalized principle, as an unreasoned and callous matter of knee-jerk ideology.
20yearmiller
10:48 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013
The house speaker showed his true colors by delaying the vote because the house had a long day and wanted to go home and sleep in their warm cuddly beds while many people around here were freezing their butts off waiting for action?? There is no excuse!!! Funny how he came around a little when his own party started dismissing him as the jerk he really is. The words shallow and heartless come to mind. He should not be speaker of the house any more. A total ego maniac.
I plead the 2nd!
11:29 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
why are the standing around freezing their butts off waiting for the government? I think the house speaker saw all the fat and pork pack into the bill and did not want to put it thru. They should have had insurance like you and i do to rebuild. It is a basic requirement. there is no reason for them to be freezing their butts off and they are not.
Ridgewood Mom
8:43 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013
If this was about pork spending then why are you arguing the case for "personal responsibility?"
Either (1) relief aid is GOOD and the government should help out but the pork needs to be trimmed, or (2) relief aid is BAD because it trains people to hold their hands out instead of standing on their own two feet and so the idea of pork is moot because spending is bad regardless.
You can not maintain consistency and argue both ways.
I plead the 2nd!
11:15 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
I was a cristy fan until now. That sandy bill is full of earmarks and pork. Those people should have had appropriate insurance. My vote does not go to bail them out. The nj government did there job by warning of the danger and getting people out. As for rebuliding this is up to the free market to do. If you can't find private investors to do it then that means it is not worth it. The government just needs to stay out of it.
Macy
11:27 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Have any of you who say INSURANCE ever had tod eal with the insurance companies??? I happen to know several families who have been impacted by this storm and they ll say the same thing, the insurance companies are trying to weasel out of paying, the insurnace companies arent answering their phones or returning calls. Easy for those of us not impacted to speak, just try sitting in a destroyed home and wiating for Insurnace to respond, or FEMA to resopns and have each one tell you you need to go to the other to file a claim. flood insurance says they dont cover it, go to homeowners. Homeowners says they dont cover it go to flood insurnace and round and round we go!!!! OBTW none of the home Im taliking about are summer homes or have had any water issues until this storm!
I plead the 2nd!
6:13 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
That last hallween ordeal my basement got flooded and they gave me 17,000 without even sending out someone. There are people that submit ridiculous claims that may be turned down. My claim was truthful and it probably rang true to the appraiser so he just sent a check.
Dan Grant
11:27 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
John, This country has a long history of responding to natural disasters and helping people when the private "Free Market" can't. It is hard to have the right insurance when the "Free Market" insurance companies try to wiggle out at every turn. These type of disasters are too big for even States to handle and the lost of the business and personal damage will be damaging to NJ revenue with the loss of the tourist business this summer. You have that Tea Party mentality that everyone stands alone and that doesn't make for a good society. I didn't vote for Christy but I commend him for standing up and taking on his party for stabbing NJ and NY in the back. This crisis and it is a crisis has brought out the best in him.
I plead the 2nd!
1:10 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Dan, If the government gives money to rebuild the area what happens when that area gets hit again? We rebuild it again? and again? don't you realize we are out of money? I am a tea party person. You sound like a communist. Well don't worry, NJ will get their money in the end. The cost will be the country's economy and a destroyed dollar. If the insurance are wiggling out of paying then take them to court. Why does the tax payer have to bail them out? How can you say individualism makes for a bad society? It actually makes for a great, strong society. remember there is charity, and americans are very charitable.
hrhppg
11:27 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Can any of the posters outraged over the earmarks and pork please explain to us specifically what those are asking for ? Where did you read the sandy bill ? Can you provide a link for the rest of us to be able to read it ?
I plead the 2nd!
3:44 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
$336 million in Amtrak expenses, $4 Million to purchase new vehicles for the FBI, $12.9 BILLION for Public Transportation to be allocated for future projects, $150 million for fisheries as far away from the storm’s path as Alaska, $2 million to repair the roofs of Museums,…oh, there’s more.
How about $5.3 BILLION for the Army Corps of Engineers, which is more than their annual budget, $50 Million in subsidies for Tree Planting, $15 Million for NASA, $41 Million to clean up Military bases including Guantanamo Bay, $20 Million for a nationwide Water Resources Priorities Study, $5 Million to projects in rural Nevada (Harry Reid‘s state), and 5 more Million for Central New Mexico.
In all, there is almost $30 Billion dollars in additional spending tacked to the Hurricane Sandy bill that the Republican’s are refusing to vote on.
The gullible and uninformed will once again denounce Republicans’ as uncaring, selfish, and vindictive.
Those who know better should applaud them!
Scondo
11:27 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Well, it is like this john, the tourism trade in NJ comprises one of the largest segments of the local economy. It generates untold amounts of revenue for the state, Things like school systems, roads, prisons, thousands of bureacratic jobs are all dependent on the taxes raised from sales of tickets to the roller coaster, the midway, the restaurants, the jet ski rentals and oh yeah even the casinos. No shore, no tax revenues for shore. That is one reason why the governor is interested in rebuilding. There are roads, and sewer systems and water delivery systems, bridges and other public infra structure that needs to be rebuilt also. It is not the one dimensional problem of homeowners that you percived. It is multi dimensional. There is no insurance that provides for rebuilding streets and the like. The Pork that was inserted into the relief bill should be traced to the person who placed it in the bill and that person should be publically castigated. You can not suddenly wipe thousands of homes and businesses off the map and not impact on local ability to provide schools and police and public works services to the people who remain and were un affected. You need to get a broader view, and stop parroting T Bagger talking points.
I plead the 2nd!
1:34 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Well, it is like this Scondo. It appears this tax revenue is too expensive to keep rebuilding every time the ocean goes haywire. If the tax revenue goes down then the government needs to down size. You can wipe those homes off the map. they can take their insurance money and go elsewhere with it. You can't keep rebuilding in flood plains over and over and over. We are in a depression. So people will lose money. I have lost money before, government never bailed me out. I am fairly wealthy now, i recovered. it was just hard work fighting back, but I did it, and I am no genius, as you will joke back that that is obvious. But it proves that these people can recover on their own without being bailed out. the government saved their lives, not they can use their health to get their hands dirty and pull themselves out of that mess from here.
Diana B. Clark
3:08 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Do those who object to government support for post-Sandy reconstruction think that no-one should ever build or live in places where tornadoes, hurricanes, tidal surges, destructive snowfall or drought occur because those things will surely happen again? This covers both coasts, the northern and southern states and the plains states. In fact there is no area of the United States that is immune from natural - underline natural - disasters (Hurricane Irene hit inland in New Jersey, Vermont and other New England states, including non-coastal areas that had suffered no major flooding before). The system of government that I support despite its many defects has the job of maintaining the infrastructure on which we all, in every State, depend. The commercial insurance companies certainly don't pay willingly or enough, but it isn't their job to rebuild roads, utility systems, bridges, public buildings; that is one of the many things that a national government is for, and that's not communism, socialism nor any other ism, it's a rational system based on the democratic ideal that we Americans rely on and support. For a sound capitalist economy we need to force government to do its job and work to rebuild (better) and make sure that vital structures are protected or relocated. Our NJ Gov. is right - it isn't the handful of mega-rich shore property owners that need restoration and improvement after the storm, it is all of us, whether or not our own lives or property were damaged.
I plead the 2nd!
3:44 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Diana, WRONG. If the area was so productive there would be plenty of money going there to rebuild without the government. If it were a 60 billion dollar gold mine then the people would not be waiting for the government to run in with the money. Trump would be there buying up and loaning out. the fact is it will be throwing good money away. Money we don't have. You need to go back to school and learn economics over again.
I plead the 2nd!
3:46 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
$336 million in Amtrak expenses, $4 Million to purchase new vehicles for the FBI, $12.9 BILLION for Public Transportation to be allocated for future projects, $150 million for fisheries as far away from the storm’s path as Alaska, $2 million to repair the roofs of Museums,…oh, there’s more.
How about $5.3 BILLION for the Army Corps of Engineers, which is more than their annual budget, $50 Million in subsidies for Tree Planting, $15 Million for NASA, $41 Million to clean up Military bases including Guantanamo Bay, $20 Million for a nationwide Water Resources Priorities Study, $5 Million to projects in rural Nevada (Harry Reid‘s state), and 5 more Million for Central New Mexico.
In all, there is almost $30 Billion dollars in additional spending tacked to the Hurricane Sandy bill that the Republican’s are refusing to vote on.
The gullible and uninformed will once again denounce Republicans’ as uncaring, selfish, and vindictive.
Those who know better should applaud them!
Ojo Rojo
1:40 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
I agree that everything that goes to a state not hit by the hurricane should be tossed but you do realize that with respect to the roofs of those museums, they did get tangentally hit down in DC by the storm and some of those roofs are over 100 years old. They do need to be fixed every so often and since we the people own them, one way or the other you will pay to fix them.
Diana B. Clark
5:33 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
John, I understand your point, but what about the fact that these disasters hit everywhere - are you saying that any place throughout the USA that gets hit by a disaster like Sandy needs to have goldmines or some other intrinsic buried treasure so that repairs are profitable? Do we have anything here in NJ that meets that criterion? Should or would Mr. Trump (interesting to cast him in the role of benevolent of self-interested benefactor) rebuild houses, schools and highways if his goldmine were damaged? So you are saying that if there is no guaranteed profit to be made, regardless of how people live their (productive working) lives, only private industry should be on the hook when disaster strikes ... survival of the fittest and the Devil take the hindmost. Under the same system there is no profit in attempting to alleviate individual human disasters either, like accident, sickness or mental or physical disability; so yes, economics alone tells us that the small business wiped out when a storm destroys the area and the insurance adjuster laughs should be allowed to rot along with the family it was supporting.. Small scale or large, your "system" is not just economically bizarre, it also fails in basic respect for human life.
I plead the 2nd!
6:13 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Again, the question is asked "What is my country going to do for ME!?
Dan Grant
7:18 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Do you have a road in front of your house John? Did your kids go to public school? did you every use the resources of a library? Do you have a bank account in a federally insured bank? No John you did not build it yourself. Does public transit help you or you business? You call me a communist ? You don't even know me but that is the tea party way. Fortunity people are turning from you point of view and when enough of them have I hear the unibombers cabin is empty and you should consider moving there.
I plead the 2nd!
7:50 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Do you have a road in front of your house John? YES. I paid for it.
Did your kids go to public school? YES, regretably after I pay my property taxes i don't have the money to put them into private school. I don't want them to turn out to be a dependant socialist crybabies.
did you every use the resources of a library? No I never really have not.
Do you have a bank account in a federally insured bank? Yes
No John you did not build it yourself. Build what? I pretty much built everything i have accumulated myself and family.
Does public transit help you or you business? Does my business help the public? Yes it does.
You call me a communist ? You sound like it to me. Remember we spent trillions of dollars fighting communism and fascism? Just to have it home grown.
You don't even know me but that is the tea party way. Yes. the taxed enough already party. We feel that the government should get by with less that half our earnings.
Fortunately people are turning from you point of view and when enough of them have I hear the unibombers cabin is empty and you should consider moving there.
Well, I am not stupid enough to fight i know i will lose my life and family, I am making plans to leave the country before Obama's the forth Reich takes hold.
I don't understand how so many people like yourselves were raised to think it was a requirement to have guarantees in life.
Edward P. Campbell
1:40 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Dan like most roads in front of someone’s home Private Enterprise built them, not the government. As far as public education, yes my children went to public school, but funny thing, the property taxes I paid for that public education are 20 times more than what a private school costs, but I’m forced to pay for public education even if I don’t use it.
Do you have a bank account in a federally insured bank? Yes I do, and I pay a heavy penalty for that, as my accounts outside of those federally insured banks return 5 to 8 times what the bank does. As far as public transportation, it neither helps me or my business, but I’m charged for it none the less.
BTW if the FDIC needs to bail out a bank, whose money do they use?
No Dan, I don’t consider you a communist. I consider you a lowly wimp who is afraid to stand on his own two feet and is too blind to see the government can give you nothing it first doesn’t have to take from you!
Dan Grant
10:58 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Edward, You call me a wimp and yet I have stood before the public with my name on the ballot, attended public forums and had my opinions of local govern heard and publically questioned. I have won 5 elections as a Demcrat in a Township which is overwhelmingly Republican. Have you? You type away but have you ever stood up infront of your neighbors because I have. If you live in a developement it may be true that the developer built those roads but not the municipal, County or State highways you use. Did you ever hear about the interstate highway system started by Ike. You didn't pay for your childrens education. The average cost of a childs education is about $12-14 thousand per year so since 65 percent of that education comes tax dollars someone else picks up the rest of the tab unless you pay $25,000 in property taxes per child and I doubt you do. You are just another ignorant person thinking they are the only ones that matter and are somehow superior to the rest of us. John the same gos for you. People like you don't belong in a civil society that wants to move forward to a better life for all.
Ridgewood Mom
10:14 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Edward: "like most roads in front of someone’s home Private Enterprise built them, not the government.
Are you saying that you live in a private development community with privately maintained roads, or do you not know who built the road in front of your house/apartment?
Edward: "the property taxes I paid for that public education are 20 times more than what a private school costs"
Really? NJ private school tuition averages about $20,000 per student. You refer to your children in plural form. So assuming you have just two children, your cost would be about $40,000 per year. You say that the taxes you paid for their public education are 20 times more then that. Assuming that 100% of your property tax bill goes to your children's public school education, which it doesn't, that would that mean that you pay $800,000 a year in property taxes. I don't believe you.
Edward: "As far as public transportation, it neither helps me or my business,"
Bull. Even if you don't use public transportation, if you or your business (if you really have one) interact with anyone, then you depend on their ability to get around.
I plead the 2nd!
1:40 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR6ExBQ4ASo
Edward P. Campbell
1:40 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Well, Well, Well
Look who is falling behind on his taxes. (Hint, search for Grant)
http://www.montvillenj.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1609&Itemid=122
Too Funny!
You see folks, this is why democrats never mind new or increased taxes ….. They don’t pay them anyway!
I plead the 2nd!
2:16 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
laughing my ass off. I spotted this grant guy right off. Nice catch. I didn't think nj had anyone like me left.
Dan Grant
10:58 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
I think it is funny that you are up late researching me and my water bill. There is no doubt that I like millions of other people have hit hard times after a life time of paying but that said it still doesn't change my right to bring the truth to ignorant, pontificating people like you guys. It isn't something I would do but you obviously have a different value system.
I plead the 2nd!
1:32 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
So you are one of the politicians responsible for our demise. One that spent my children's money she hasn't even earned yet. You are one of the ones that was so generous with her future. Yes we do have a different value system. You have no idea what your value system has done to the future of this country. How many government checks do you get a month?
Edward P. Campbell
1:32 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
There are thousands of us here John; sadly, there are thousands of Dans too!
46 million on food stamps alone and lord knows how many others on what type of government handouts.
BTW, did you know the biggest tax loophole in the world is given to people who had their houses given to them like Dan? (oh sorry, he actually paid $1.00 for it) I think people who receive such gifts should be taxed the same monthly amount they would pay if they had to make monthly mortgage payments like the rest of us, and then that money should be earmarked to federal debt reduction, or even better building a road, because you know the government builds roads --- NOT! !
Riddle me this too John. How can one live in Montville NJ, and pay under $1,900.00 a year in Property taxes? (hint Mt. Laurel)
http://php.app.com/mod4_10/results.php?county=Morris&muniprop=Montville&location_num=&location_st=&owner=grant&Submit=Search&classname=%25&descp=
BTW, did you notice how our esteemed law makers magically raised the “rich” mark passed their already inflated salaries! Financial Cliff my a$$!
PS. Dan favored “The Journals” printing of gun owners address. He called it public information that he has a right to. So I guess he would mine me putting some of his public information up here either! Late on his water bill. So the fool thinks every other person in Montville should buck up and pay for his water. Or maybe he just thinks the government should just give it to him for free!
I plead the 2nd!
2:44 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Now I am getting a much better picture of the likes of Grant. He hardly pays any taxes and doesn't even pay his bills but is very generous with making other people pay. Now I understand. He gets away with paying a hundred dollars a month in montville to live. Wow. Ed... Don't you think Grant can afford to pay just a little bit more in taxes. Since when is selfishness a virtue anyway. He must have extra money left over after he pays his bills. he can surely send more of it to the government, or me. I pay 10 times more in property taxes than he does. That is not fair. Why should I have to pay more taxes than Grant. He should man up and come bail me out of my tax bill. Yeah, I would like to know what the story was on that house purchase for a dollar. What kind of corruption happened there?
Edward P. Campbell
2:44 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Yes Dan, we do have a different value system. I PAY my BILLS
Also Dan, I’m on a well, and when it breaks I have to dig real deep (no pun intended) in my pocket and shell out 4 or 5 thousand dollars if I want my water back. I do not have the luxury of deferring payment to the well repair people, because I’ve fallen on “Hard Times.” That aside Dan, I see you are still connected to the Internet. What does that cost you a year $500.00? I bet you have a cell phone too. How much is that a year another $500.00. Do you have two cars? What’s that a couple thousands a year? How about a big screen TV? I’m sure you do!
But you expect, no force, all your Montville neighbors to carry your load by not paying your water bill.
I think Dan, the government should come to your house and shut off your water until you pay up. I bet you’ll drop your internet and cell phone service like a hot potato, right along with selling a car and that Big Screen, and maybe even your computer too.
But not you Dan. No Dan you believe you are entitled to everything everyone else worked their a$$es off for just because you are alive. Right Dan? A quick search of jobs in your area shows literally hundreds of them. Many requiring “some college” and not too much other knowledge. Get your a$$ off the Internet, get a job and pay your water bill you parasite!
Edward P. Campbell
2:44 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Yes Dan, we do have a different value system. I pay my bills, and I don't get dragged into court and forced by a judge to retract lies I spewed about other people.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/soussa-v-grant
Edward P. Campbell
6:21 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Yes Dan, our value system is different. I try not to break the law, particularly an election laws, but you seem to have absolutely no regard for them.
http://www.elec.state.nj.us/ELECReport/ComplaintsFDDetailReport.aspx?Report=All&Name=d+grant
Oh and Dan, feel free to yell foul if any of these posts I’m putting up here are false.
I plead the 2nd!
7:54 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
The link had an error, but i am dyeing to see it!
Edward P. Campbell
11:03 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Sorry about that John -- Try this:
http://goo.gl/fxRqa
Edward P. Campbell
6:21 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Dan says: “People like you don't belong in a civil society that wants to move forward to a better life for all.” Meaning we have to take from those who are moving forward and give it to them that are sitting on their a$$es. You know like people with some college, who think they should be paid the same as a brain surgeon.
Adrian Rogers, got it right when he said: “You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”
I plead the 2nd!
7:54 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Ed, we are on the same page, but I can't articulate like you can. I have the concept born in my blood, I just don't know how to say it like you can. but i know what is constitutional and what is not. My heros are Peter schiff, ron paul, marc faber, Gerald Celente, Jim rodgers and now Ed Campbell been added to my list. Your killing me with this guy. LOL
Edward P. Campbell
11:03 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
John, Thank You!
I see you are kind of a doom and gloomer? Me too, but I pray each and every night that I’m wrong, just like I pray I never have to use the fire extinguisher next to my kitchen stove, or the air bags in my car to save my life. But regardless of my prayers, I stay prepared, my fire extinguisher is charged and checked, my air bags are charged and check, I always wear my seatbelt, and I keep a picture of the Titanic on the wall of my office to remind myself why I do those thing. You see, on that dreadful night the few people who ran for the life preservers and life boats after the ship hit the iceberg were laughed and scoffed at by all the others on the ship. But today we call those that prepared early for the obvious survivors, and the rest who didn’t ……… Dead!
Ridgewood Mom
11:44 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
I do everything I can to be prepared as well, but its much better knowing that, if something really bad happens, someone has got my back or will at least care to try to. And few things make me happier then knowing that, in a time of need, I can help someone else out as well.
Ridgewood Mom
12:04 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Are you prepared with your "weapons and ammunition" too, Edward?
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/12/wow_waiting_for_the_apocalypse.php?ref=fpblg
Ridgewood Mom
12:13 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/12/17/newtown_and_the_doomsday_preppers?page=full
Cletus
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Speaking of the Titanic, one cannot help but chuckle at the mental image of Edward P. Campbell's great grandfather dressed in a fetching frock, elbowing women and children out of the way to snag his seat on a lifeboat while John's illiterate counterpart goes down in steerage. Just the way it should be, amirite, teabaggers?
Ridgewood Mom
8:21 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Edward and John,
I am stunned by the personal nature of your attacks on Dan, and also by their lack of moderation by site administration. It is sad that when the facts are against you and reality is against you that all you are left with is pounding the table and name calling. You present an excellent example, here, of the very callousness that Gov. Christy referred to.
How much do the two of you bring in and pay in taxes? I know that I bring in plenty and pay plenty. I always pay all my bills on time and have never had the misfortune of being taken to court. But I know that I am not better because of it. Neither are either of you, if your records are so perfect.
Here are a couple of questions. If I were to demonstrate that I brought more in then both of you combined, paid more in taxes and managed my bill payments better, would you acknowledge that I necessarily must work harder then you have? Would you then agree that my contributions to society were necessarily more innovative and useful then yours? Somehow, I doubt that you would see it that way.
Dan is right. Everyone who has money has had help that has allowed them to obtain it. After all, money is a social instrument. The government is a huge part of any individual's financial success, not only because it provides countless services that we all depend upon but because, ultimately, it prints the money and establishes the playing field by which all money making occurs.
Cletus
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
These attacks are extremely disturbing, I agree, and am also concerned that Patch admin is so passive/absent concerning responses to Mr. Grant that border on stalking.
Edward P. Campbell
5:02 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
More Liberalism – Cleute would rather see Censorship then True Facts Posted! Cyber stalking? Are You Kidding Me! It is PUBLIC Record and in fact Public Knowledge, believe me, many, yes many in Montville know the Dan Grant Story. Ask anyone he ever sued, or had the courage to run against him!
Edward P. Campbell
11:03 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Part 1
Ridgewood Mom, there is no personal attack here. Facts are not attacks. Example, it is a fact that Dan ran afoul of NJElec laws, and was threatened with a $3,500.00 fine from the State. An attack would be more on the lines of me saying; Dan was the worst politician to ever serve Montville.
Now to you. I noticed in another post of yours, you support government involvement in providing goods and services, and you labeled that as “good!” Okay that is your opinion, you are entitled to it, however I think it is dead wrong and I believe our federal government should be strictly held to the 18 enumerated powers as provided by Article 1 Section 8 of the US Constitution. I believe if we want to see the government involved in such things as FDIC, and Flood Insurance, then change the Constitution to allow it, otherwise forget it!
As to how much you paid in taxes, or how much money you earned and spent, it is none of my business. Real estate taxes are published to ensure all houses are fairly assessed, as it is the nature of the system.
FTR, I do contribute a lot, not only in terms of taxes, but also donations, and a large personal involvement of my time, but that’s my business, and I have no desire to share it with you, nor does it matter to me if I do more or less than you, but I’ll take this opportunity to thank you for your efforts!
Ridgewood Mom
11:27 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
They are personal attacks because you are focusing on Dan and his character and not on the topic of Christie and what he termed as "callous." If you were arguing against Dan's points about the role of government in assisting people then you would be offering something that supports that case, and not something that attempts to make a case against Dan. Ad hominem, as such, usually stems from insecurities over a failure to present reasonable argument.
Regarding earnings and taxation, do I understand correctly then that, like me, you do not believe that the simple matter of having money necessitates any sort of deserving or representation of harder work put in? And regarding your feelings that my relative degree of wealth does not matter to you, does that mean that you would respect me as much so if my situation were as Dan's as if it were like Donald Trump's or a recent Powerball winner?
FourScore
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Hey Ed, here's a little test for you. The next time you get in your car and want to gosomewhere, try getting to your destination without travelling on any public roads, or going over any public bridges. Get back to me and let me know how that worked out for you.
Edward P. Campbell
11:03 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Part 2 - Ridgewood Mom:
Money is NOT a social instrument, it is the media in which we barter with each other to fairly obtain goods and services. As to the government and the money it prints, as far as I’m concerned they can burn every last worthless dollar of their fiat money, I prefer gold, food, clothing, shelter, weapons and ammunition to fiat money!
Ridgewood Mom
11:29 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
"Money is any object or record that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services and repayment of debts in a given socio-economic context or country."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money
Ridgewood Mom
11:38 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Edward,
Do you grow, raise, cultivate, hunt and/or kill all of your own food? To do you cook it all yourself? Did you make the ovens, plates and eating utensils, dining room table and chairs, etc. that you use entirely yourself? What about the napkins?Did you build every inch of your house and everything in it with your own hands? What about the materials used to construct it with? Where did you obtain those? And your gun? Did you carve it out of a tree yourself, smelt the metal that you mined yourself and mix your own gunpowder with minerals that you found in the hills? Where did you learn to do those things? Was no one else involved in teaching yo such thing?
My bet is that you traded some money for some of all that.
Ojo Rojo
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
RM, money is a very useful tool for those of us who are productive that helps us trade the value of our labor for goods and services we could not otherwise make for ourselves. But it isn't the money that has value, it is our labor that has value. Money is just a means of storing and exchanging the value our labor creates. Perhaps if you did something besides shill for those who just seek to take the value of our labor and redistribute it to someone else, you might get that.
Ridgewood Mom
3:06 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Ojo Rojo: "But it isn't the money that has value, it is our labor that has value. Money is just a means of storing and exchanging the value our labor creates."
That was my point to Edward. Wealth is not money. Wealth is goods and services. Money is just a (fallible) social tool used to represent wealth and to assist in barter and exchange. A person does not create wealth simply because they have money or acquire money.
Of course there are boundless examples of persons who obtain much money and do not contribute labor, examples of persons who contribute much in the way of labor and obtain little in the way of wealth, and examples of deserving wealthy and poor individuals. The important thing is to recognize that the simple matter of having money does not NECESSARILY equal harder work, greater ingenuity, etc. People who are relatively poor are not NECESSARILY lazy moochers. Its about having a very basic level of deserved humility.
People who fall victim to financial hardship due to natural disasters, like hurricanes and such, are not lazy moochers. Many of them are harder working people who did everything more right then did many of us with a whole lot more.
BellairBerdan
11:03 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
It's shameful to see the glee that some take at the misfortune of others.
Edward P. Campbell
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
BellairBerdan I take no glee in the misfortunes of others. I too have suffered many misfortunes in my life time. The only thing I object to here is the ones who seem to think I am somehow obligated to help them with their misfortunes, while they have never helped me with mine!
Ridgewood Mom
3:26 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
That is usually how it works, Edward, and why I feel for you. It is usually the people who have suffered and are hurting the most who act most callously toward others.
Edward P. Campbell
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Ridgewood Mom – You said - “ I (you) can help someone else out as well.” You’ve also mentioned your net worth is fairly high. Given that then why don’t you put your words to actions, and pay Dan’s water bill for him? In fact why don’t you just pay off all those people who need help paying for their water in Montville? After all, it is not their fault they have fallen on hard times is it?
BTW, if you think the government has done such good job printing money, why is it that it now takes so many more dollars to buy an ounce of gold, than it did in 1970? Hint, the gold didn’t change, but the value of the dollar did! Think Nixon and 1971!
Ridgewood Mom
3:22 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
I'm not sure if I did say that my net worth was fairly high. What is high is relative. Many have more then me and many have less. I pointed out that I would fit your stated criterion for being financially responsible, meaning that you have no reason to speak abusively toward me as you do to Dan, and I asked you rhetorically about what it would mean to you if I was doing better financially then you were. Alas, we will probably never know the answer because neither your finances, which you have stated are personal, nor mine have been exposed here in the manner that you have seen fit to expose of Dan's.
My point was that our relative wealth shouldn't matter. I don't really care what you or Dan or anyone else makes, in relation to me or others, and want you to understand that it doesn't matter. That sort of measure says little to nothing about any of our relative merits or human worth. And that is why Dan was right and you were wrong before you saw fit to attack him.
Dan Grant
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
John and Edward, since you have attacked on so personal a level without the true facts (a Tea Party Tactic) let me say this. I am 65 years old and paid everything as I was required to until outside events changed my life. I wish you the same kind of events that occurred in my life, which in short means that you and your wives should both get cancer as self employed people. Let's see how self reliant you are then. Yes I live in Mt. Laural Housing. That is a fact. No judge ever ruled that I lied about anyone. There was a settlement in that case in which there was no monetary reward and no appology. The ELEC fine was for a supposed failure to file a form (1 out of 100) that simply said I was not going to spend any money in an election in which I spent no money. The fine was reduced to $150.00. Edward why don't you list where you live and how many children were educated because I don't believe you paid for your childrens education. The community did and you contributed to that but in no way did you pay the full cost. If you believe that finding yourself in dire financial circumstances is any way to live at 65 then you have no view of how many people in America find themselves in those circumstances and I hope that you learn by personal experience. BTW I bought no house for a $1.00 you have the wrong Dan Grant.
Dan Grant
2:30 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
PS, I, Like most of the people you distain go to work 6 days a week in an attempt to get back on my feet. If it is successfull fine and if it isn't I make no complaint about my circumstances. Life happens and it happens to way too many people in America. Seeking work at 65 is no picnic. You can say that people like me have no right to opinions on the issues of the day and are wrong on public policy based on their particular lives but that is not how America works. My guess is that you would be far happier if only white property owning men were the only voters.
I plead the 2nd!
3:26 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Tea party means, Taxed enough Already. Why do you liberals always try and demonize people who live with in their budgets? Typical liberal tactic. You and the likes of you have destroyed this country beyond repair. I guess just enjoy it while the fantasy lasts, you will be dead before you see the true results of what you have done to this country. your a pig.
Edward P. Campbell
3:45 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Dan, I would never wish cancer on anyone, not even you. But since we are disclosing so much here know this. I am a cancer survivor, 7 years in remission now. (Gees Dan, I guess your wish did come true) My wife was seriously injured by a drunk driver, and requires mechanical aid to get around. I, too, am self employed. Also, just to be clear, the drunk that hit my wife had no insurance, and no money, so don’t go getting the idea we are living off some type of lawsuit we won against him! In fact for the record the “help” we got from the government was being told – you can sue him, but he probably doesn’t have any assets to cover any type of settlement anyway!
But back to you Dan. Here you are paying a tenth of the amount of property tax you should be paying living in Mt. Laurel Housing, on the Internet, using your computer, paying an I.S.P, but not paying your water bill, thereby forcing all the other rate payers to make up for what you didn’t pay. Dan, I’m sorry for your misfortunes, but I think you have a heck of a lot of nerve sitting here posting on a $1,000.00 computer, using an I.S.P that cost you $600.00 a year and you are not man enough to own up to your responsibilities, and yet you have the nerve to condemn my life style?
BTW, that $1.00 house. You didn’t sell that to one of your children, so you would qualify for that Mt. Laurel apartment, now did you?
PS. Every American Citizen has a right to vote, why would you think different?
Dan Grant
5:02 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
I don't condemn your life style I condemn your selfish elitist attidude and your belief that "You built it Youself" and too bad for anyone else. This discussion started to be about the misery and distruction of people (not me I don't have a shorehouse) and you very quickly turned it into a personal attack about me. Since you are so good at looking up my backround why don't you look at the complete picture of the sale of our family house including the dates and look at when I bought a unit of Mt. Laurel housing and when this alledged sale for a dollar took place. You will see about an 8 year time lapse. As far as the computer and the internet go I need them for work (yes I do work) and the computer is old bought in better times and no I don't have a big screen TV or own a car. A car is a part of my compensation such as it is but I am out there 6 days a week trying to dig out of this hole. Regardless of my circumstances I still can muster a good deal of empathy for people who have it alot worse than I do. You clearly have none so in the end I would much rather be me than be you.