Whole Foods Raises Traffic, Other Concerns, Residents Say
Disputed Waterview Plaza proposal continues to be met with resistance from neighbors.
Testimony on the disputed Waterview Plaza development proposal—which would bring a Whole Foods Market to Parsippany—continued before the township Planning Board at the municipal building Monday night.
Before the board is a plan for a mixed-use 26-acre development for retail stores including the high-end natural-foods market and 72 upscale three-story townhomes to appear in or near 2015 on Route 46 across from the Parsippany Police headquarters. The land in question is the last undeveloped piece of the 132-acre plot that stands between Route 46 and Iintervale Road.
The Nov. 19 Planning Board meeting served as round one in what looks likely to become a long-lasting, acrimonious slugfest between developer RD Realty LLC and Intervale area residents, who turned out en masse to stand against the proposal.
The area, zoned for office development (which will require an approval to become an overlay zone to allow mixed use) has been targeted for development in the past as a combination retail/residential project and as an office complex. Both plans were shot down due to resident backlash.
Another full house of citizens greeted the board Monday night for what turned out to be a brutal round two, with many if not most in the audience hoping to see this plan, like its predecessors, fall to defeat.
Testimony resumed with traffic engineer John Meyer, who described proposed traffic improvements to the area while answering resident complaints regarding protecting accessibility for those who live in the area.
Among the ideas proposed in what Meyer called merely a "concept plan" at this stage of the process, included blocking Forest Drive to through traffic; widening left-turn lanes; and creating U-turns, cul de sacs and hammerhead turns to control traffic flow.
Meyer also mentioned the proposed addition of a pedestrian walkway from Waterview Boulevard to Route 46.
Most in the audience reacted harshly to the ideas, with people snorting derisively, laughing or shouting out comments to criticize the engineer's statements.
Meyer maintained throughout that traffic and engineering studies show the project to be a viable one, however, it did not appear that residents found his testimony credible.
One area of contention dealt with the idea of traffic flow.
"We found the peak for retail [traffic] would be in the evenings between 4-6 p.m. and Saturdays between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. That's when the heaviest traffic is," Meyer testified. "In the morning between 7 and 9, there wouldn't be much traffic. On Saturday, traffic is very, very low, in connection with offices on Waterview Boulevard, and that's the heaviest time for retail."
He added that the traffic plans would have to win the approval of the state Department of Transportation.
"Overall we believe this site is ideally situated," Meyer said, describing the project as being upscale and high-end and having "very tastefully done" signage. "It's not very often that you have a shopping center in an area where you would have office space. ... Retail and residential access and traffic would be totally separate."
The engineer added that the developer is working to meet the township's requirements and to "answer the comments of our neighbors."
The Planning Board had a number of questions for Meyer.
Gordon Meth, the board's traffic engineer criticized the developer's plan to create cul de sacs around the Waterview area to control access.
"There's about 150 homes back there," Meth warned. "I wouldn't recommend closing any egress or access back there."
He noted that a downed power line could create serious difficulty for residents during an emergency situation. He added that a number of the roads involved are in Mountain Lakes, making enforcement of traffic rules troublesome.
When the public was given an opportunity to question the engineer, Board Chair Kaushik "Casey" Parikh delivered a stern warning.
"Questions only are allowed, no comments," he said. "There will be a chance for comments later, but if you comment now, I will have to stop you."
Queries covered traffic particulars and parking, and there were numerous attempts by residents to trip the engineer up on surprise questions or by giving him questions better suited to the developer's architect, who has yet to testify.
In one series of questions, resident Alison Bavas asked the engineer about traffic analysis.
"Did you look at the school times for drop-off and pick-up of buses?" she asked.
"That was included in our counts between 4 and 6 p.m.," Meyer replied.
"School lets out before 4," Bavas said, having landed an apparent "gotcha." "Buses were not included."
Then she switched to the developer's stated plan to have 50 feet of evergreen buffer between existing residences and the development.
"Did you take into account the bears that would be displaced and where they were going to go?"
The engineer conceded he had not.
Some residents applauded Bavas' efforts.
Another resident later asked about deer, foxes, turkeys and other wildlife. Meyer had to admit that he wasn't the expert who could deal with that topic.
Resident Ken Yarama couched a comment within a question. He asked about plans to construct sidewalks leading down Waterview Boulevard and allowing pedestrians to cross Route 46, and then brought up a traffic situation in another part of town.
"We've had problems with accidents at Beverwyck Road and Route 46," he said. "It's a very dangerous game to play where you have pedestrians trying to cross Route 46. Have you studied that aspect of the serious nature of pedestrians trying to cross Route 46 given the volume of traffic?"
"Pedestrian safety has been studied," Meyer countered. "That's all part of our final plan, which would have to be approved."
Resident Eileen White asked Meyer to define "department store."
"It's a store that offers a variety of goods for purchase," the engineer replied.
"What kind are you contemplating?" White demanded, wanting to know the identity of an unnamed store that reportedly has a signed lease to operate as part of the Waterview development. "Is it Target? Is it Macy's?"
"I am not at liberty to indicate that information," he said. "That will be divulged as soon as it's completed."
Meyer added that he does not know the name of the department store.
Hoots from the audience indicated that many did not believe that statement. Rumors have swirled that Target is the mystery merchant that would serve as an anchor for the retail portion of the development along with high-end Whole Foods Market.
Resident Nancy Choffo asked about the stores' potential impact on Sunday traffic.
"I assume they will meet all requirements of law," said Meyer. "We assume Sunday will be the lightest [in terms of traffic]."
"Right," Choffo noted with a bit of sarcasm. "Because people aren't shopping in a shopping center on Saturday and Sunday."
She continued onward.
"Has anyone contacted the [Environmental Protection Agency] regarding runoff for the brook that runs behind Forest Avenue?"
Meyer said the the brook was not a tributary.
"Runoff will go south toward Route 46," he said, adding that the water would wend its way to stone water detention basins. "Runoff will be no greater than before development."
Choffo didn't buy that answer.
"I looked it up," she said. "Mercury and water runoff from high traffic areas. The brook is already contaminated to some degree. You're guaranteeing no widlife will be impacted?"
"With respect to drainage, ours will be going in the opposite direction," the engineer maintained. "There are no wildlife impacts with the Troy Brook Tributary. We will get clearance on that issue from an investigation by the state Department of Environmental Protection."
Resident Robert Sudol took issue with the proposed 50-foot buffer.
"Why did that go down from 300 feet when I bought the property 13 years ago, and then it was reduced to 200 when development was tried years ago and now 50," he said.
Despite being pummeled with questions and gotcha attempts, Meyer stood firm in his defense of the proposal "based on my experience of 50 years."
"Nothing is absolutely guaranteed, but i feel confident," he said.
Then a question sailed from the audience: "So there's no guarantee?"
Nancy Brighton, representing the Historic Preservation Committee, asked about the potential impact of land disturbance on adjacent historic homes and a tiny historic cemetery in the area.
Attorney Robert Garofalo indicated that the question needed to go to the architect.
The lawyer asked for the testimony to be carried to the Dec. 17 Planning Board meeting to allow the developer's architect to come and deal with appropriate questions that could not be handled by the traffic engineer.
Chairman Parikh agreed and said the matter would begin again on the 17th. The board voted to adjourn.
Nancy Choffo spoke for her fellow residents: "We don't want this."
"I am sure there is some fact buried in what the traffic expert said," noted resident David Kaplan. "But they are not taking into account that people will ultimately find shortcuts ...when traffic builds and those shortcuts will be through our neighboroods seven days a week.
"We're going to have to find a balance that neighbors can live with. Right now, there is no balance, it's what [the developer wants]."
Resident Phil Kornreich agreed, pointing to resident concerns over buffering, density, noise pollution, light pollution, traffic and a sense that those who live in the Intervale area aren't being taken seriously.
"This clearly would change our quality of life," insisted Kaplan. "Until we can find a balance, an impact that's less egregious, we're going to keep packing the room until they listen to us."
Patch attempted to ask Mayor James Barberio, who attended the meeting, his thoughts on what the proposal could mean in terms of economic development for the town. He declined to comment.
Diane babicz
7:37 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I would not support this project. Why can't this project, or the Whole Foods part of it, move to the old Walgreens/Costcutters on 46? There is no need to exhaust the little remaining wooded land we have left in Parsippany.
Chris
3:23 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Were you against the development when they were building your house in Parsippany? That all used to be wooded area's too. You can build, but now you don't want your neighbors to? Seems a little selfish to me.
Kenneth Kaplan
8:04 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
The average size of a new Whole Foods store is 47,300 sq. ft.. The old Walgreens is only 30,000. Unless you buy it, you have no right to tell a property owner that he shouldn't use his land for what he deems to be the highest and best use.
Annie
7:40 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
or the empty michaels, or the empty blockbuster/Ihop, etc, etc
Diane babicz
7:45 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Hear hear!
Nancy Choffo
8:09 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
It was standing room only at last night's meeting.The taxpayers of Parsippany do not want this development! The wildlife will be impacted greatly. Over the past 13 years, I have seen countless numbers of wild turkey and fox in that area along with black bears and many other eagles and hawks. This is a valuable asset to our community.
I may not be an engineer but water always travels downward and takes the least resistant path. I do not believe that Troy Brook will not be affected by this over development of land. The town homes will have an entrance only to and from Intervale Road. It will be a dangerous entrance & exit with the oncoming traffic. Water will travel down that street. When the heavy rains come, will it then flood Intervale Road? That water can travel across the road into the steam on the other side into Mountain Lakes. Are these developers going to put a guarantee in writing that no existing homes will impacted by displaced water?
Mountain Lakes residents need to be made aware of this development. It will increase the traffic on Intervale Road, Old Bloomfield Road, and most likely Midvale Road. People will use the side roads to cut through the traffic and to avoid all the traffic lights.
We hope the Parsippany Board will listen to its taxpayers and reply with NO to these developers. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean that you should.
Steve
9:12 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
People are already using Intervale and Midvale as cut throughs when traffic is backed up on 46. I'm surprised at how little discussion has taken place about the impact on the schools. The schools that are already overcrowded because of stacking in the apartments in town. If this project goes through I will likely move out of Parsippany. I don't even LIVE in Intervale, but I have to deal with the impact of the daily traffic on and around Rt 46 everyday...and the traffic is going to be horrendous if this is approved.
John
9:35 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Steve,
I agree with your comments about the schools. I wanted to ask this question last night, but the focus of the Q&A was on the developer's presentation of traffic and engineering. The schools question is something that the township needs to answer, and we need to have that addressed at the next meeting.
It was clear from the large turnout and the tone of the audience that the residents of the area do NOT want this project to go through. The only way for the Town Council to approve this is to completely ignore the wishes of the neighborhood and to prioritize the developer's financial gain over the township's quality of life.
Scott Hospes
10:40 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
To Nancy's point, the eagle is still listed as an endangered species in NJ per this following website : http://www.conservewildlifenj.org/species/fieldguide/view/Haliaeetus%20leucocephalus/
that said, this is an avenue that we could use to block this plan. Imagine thinking of nature for once over uneccessary construction.
Joe Moyenne
8:37 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The Walgreens location is already spoken for. An Indian grocer will be moving into that location. The Michael's location is probably ill suited to handle the parking needs that would be generated by whole foods. The same is likely for the ihop/blockbuster location. That's not to say I agree with tearing down another 26 acres of land for some strip mall / big box store hybrid... I don't, but those solutions don't really make sense.
John Depot
10:35 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Ahhh, there IS intelligent life out there! Well spoken, Joe.
Annie
10:58 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The point is to identify the existing vacant retail space already existing in Parsippany. This development is for a Whole Foods and a large box department store (Target, maybe?) and another retail space for a bank, restuarant or something. We already have vacanct retail space so why build more? What is the possibility the other two spaces won't sit vacant and be just another eyesore along Rt. 46?
Joe Moyenne
2:18 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I agree that it would be preferable to fill an existing location, rather than create a new one. I'm simply pointing out that the suggestions so far aren't really workable. If Parsippany really needs an Whole Foods (and that's an all together debatable topic, in and of itself), then I'm not sure I know of a vacancy that foots the bill.
Dave Phillips
9:00 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
This project is so over-sized and out of character for the area.
The town does not need more pavement and ugly big box stores such as Target and a bank, let alone more students in our school district.
Whole Foods will cater to a niche clientle based most out of neighboring Mt Lakes, not the majority of Parsippany residents who will continue to shop at Shop Rite.
Parsippany residents will surely foot the bill for road improvements and such since the developers will receive a tax abatement.
It's a lose-lose for all Parsippany residents and tax payers.
Pete
9:28 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The key pharase is "Nothing is absolutely guaranteed," That means that the developer and his engineers will say absolutely ANYTHING to get the job approved. Then when it doesn't turn out, "Nothing is absolutely guaranteed,"
That's one of the few large stretches of woodland left in the town -- the only other I can think of is the back of Sylvan Way/Entin Road. Why tear it up and "put in a parking lot" when there are at least two prime retail locations - Walgreen's and Michael's old stores - lying empty ?
BTW, the "traffic study" thing is likely bogus. I've seen this before - the argument being that office workers will be lost for a couple of days, until they find the best way in, and then the traffic problems will go away. NONSENSE -- when you have retail, you have an endless stream of people who've never BEEN there before, getting lost on the local streets.
We need this development like we need cancer.
Curt
9:51 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Why is the Parsippany Water Department doing an evaluation? Why are the taxpayer's employees getting paid to do what the developer should have completed themselfs? The developer should be telling them how much water 72 townhomes and a strip mall will need and then let the Water Deparament tell them if it is at all probable. With out enough water this proposal is D.O.A. When I moved in 20+ years ago I could water my lawn whenever I wanted, now with the restrictions washing your car or keeping your lawn green are almost impossible. HOW CAN WE SUSTAIN MORE GROWTH WITHOUT FINDING MORE WATER? How can I have water restricted after 20 years of paying taxes and now new people use what little there is left in our wells during peak months! Oh and condo's always have sprinkler systems!!!
Chris
3:21 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Well, the problem isn't that we don't have enough water. All the water that we have is being piped to the Urban Area's... i.e. the Jersey City Reservoir
Annie
10:14 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The traffice study is bogus. They studied the traffic around the development, where they say there won't be an issue as there are 3 lanes of traffic and they will make improvements to the jug handles and change traffic light patterns. They admitted last night that the traffic study only inlcuded the existing traffic in Parsippany and adjusted it for the new development at Waterview, and the additional traffic for the replacement business at Loman Ford and occupancy in the vacant office space at Waterview. The traffic study only includes current traffic patterns which is lower than the normal due to the vacant retail space (Michaels, Walgreens, IHOP, Blockbuster, etc), other vacant office space in Parsippany that is not in Waterview and the vacant houses in Parsippany. The current traffic situation along Rt 46 is horrendous, especially where there are only 2 lanes during rush hour (Shop Rite mall,Rainbow lakes area). We are not at full capacity and it is this bad. Imagine what it will be like when the existing empty retail/office/housing space is occupied AND this new development adds to it! Rt 46 in Parsippany will be another Rt 10 and Rt 23. This is our future.
Annie
10:15 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
There will be increased traffic to the side roads as well, Midvale&Intervale in Mountain Lakes, Rt. 202/Parsippany Blvd, Littleton Road as neighboring towns will travel the local roads to get to and from this development. Parsippany residents wll pay for the more frequent repaving that will be required on these roads as they get more use, not the developer. Also, what is the impact on traffic accidents with this new traffic? Does their traffic study include that? With increased traffic, there will be increased accidents draining our ambulance and police resources. Parsippany residents will pay for this as well. This development will have a everlasting effect on the whole town, not just the intervale section. The traffic is only one concern of this development, there are many more. Please get involved and learn more about it before it is too late.
Scott Hospes
10:46 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
As a small business owner with an office in the Mountain Lakes Business Park, the traffic is horrible NOW going up the hill towards Denville every day. I cannot imagine how much worse it will be if this project goes through. From what I have read it does not appear that the traffic study takes many factors into consideration nor the impact to our schools, residents and as pointed out by Curt, the water consumption required to support the new homes and businesses.
with the amount of empty Commercial buildings in our town, I fail to see how this proposal makes logical sense except to increase the revenue from taxes.
Scott Hospes
10:27 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
From what I have read of what occured, I have significant concerns that there seem to be so many unknowns from the engineers perspective. The fact that our mayor would comment is even more concerning.
I live on Intervale and can tell you that the traffic that speeds down Intervale is already quite heavy, with what is being proposed it will be horrific.
Lake Intervale school has already been expanded to take into account the significant increase in children. Where will all the new children go? Our schools are at capacity as it is.
As we have eagles in the area, perhaps we the citizens can get the wild life area designated so that it cannot be developed?
Bottom line - seems like our elected political leaders, you know, the ones that are for the people and by the people, seem more interested in increasing the tax base without fully thinking out the true ramifications.
Curt
10:43 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I would like to know if their traffic expert Mr. Meyer ever tried to drive west on route 46 up the hill toward Mountain Lakes and Denville between 4-6 oclock. What he called the peak hours are nightmare hours. Route 80 west is even worse so how do you travel through this area? Also how could he say between 7-9 oclock going east is not as bad has he tried coming from Denville to Parsippany thats also nightmare
He will just say whatever the developers want him to say!! Oh one other point how do you block trafic from Forest Drive in his concept plan, wheres the actual plan? can we see it? NO!
Annie
10:47 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
You are correct with the many unknowns by the developer's expert. The response is generally, "it is only a concept plan" for the overlay approval. The "unknown" would be answered through the "site plan" which is apparently developed after the "overlay" approval. Therefore, our elected political leaders would be deciding based on many "unknowns" which can easily be a developer dream and the Parsippany residents nightmare. A small sample of the issues at hand with this developent:
1-traffic
2-resources-schools, water, police, fire/emergency/ambulance, etc
3-wildlife perservation/open space
4-historical value of Doremus cemetery located on the 26 acres, possible relics/artifacts and preservation of the historic Doremus Home located on Intervale road.
5-maintaining the residential charateristic of Intervale community.
It seemed the only information the engineer/expert had last night was information on traffic in the waterview area and the development itself. Most everything else was not known or looked at for the 'overlay' application approval. Seems to me, a decision cannot be made without looking at the FULL impact on the town before the "overlay" approval occurs.
Curt
11:45 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Let's list the pros and cons.
CONS
1) Traffic nightmares and hazardous conditions to pedestrians.
2) Not enough school space, classrooms and teachers.
3) Current and maybe even more stringent water restrictions, or even worse no water.
4) We may need more Police and Firemen.
5) No where for the bears, foxes, coyotes, deer, and turkeys. ( If you walk down Intervale Road in the a.m. you will see at least 2 large flocks of turkeys on most days. Last week I saw a coyote very near the proposed site and turkeys on the other side of the fence.)
6) The Township will collect more tax dollars and spend twice what they collect trying to fix all of the other problems created by this project.
PROS
1) The Township will collect more in tax dollars, give the builder tax breaks. Which will anger the taxpayers and we will probably vote them out. Nice job guys!!!!
Bob Crawford
11:58 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
"Patch attempted to ask Mayor James Barberio who attended the meeting his thoughts on what the proposal could mean in terms of economic development for the town. He declined to comment"
Why would Mayor Barberio decline to comment given the implications this project might have on the township he was elected to lead? With the Mayoral election only 10 months away surely the Mayor has a position. Why won't he share it?
John
6:10 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The mayor has stated he is in favor of this project. He may have some minor concerns, but he has repeatedly stated he wants the overlay and businesses in there.
Michael Brancato
6:45 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Probably because he has nothing new to say, Bob. I'm sure he will comment when he does. That's one of those things that smart politicians do: only comment when you have something worthwhile to say.
clyde donovan
12:46 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I don't think there is any way Barberio can get re-elected - and most of the council too.
Dave Phillips
1:38 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
He will seal his fate of losing the next election if he supports this bogus scam of a zoning change.
clyde donovan
1:13 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Here's some info. on this development. The actual name of the deveoper is RD Management LLC. Here are easy links to follow to learn more. It sure looks like this is a done deal. Maybe the corrupt money has already changed hands?
1) http://rdmanagement.com/properties_northeast.html
2) http://www.rdmanagement.com/files/ParsippanyNJ.pdf
Annie
1:26 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I could not access the second link at this time but the first link provides a site plan that includes an additional 7 smaller retail spaces to the right of Whole foods. Maybe they want 900 parking spaces for the future stores they build after they get the 1st three approved. I can see where this site continues to grow and takeover the office building space in years to come when they claim they can't rent the office space and need to tear them down to build reatil space. At the same time, they will continue to reduce the existing buffer zone from +300 to <50 feet.
clyde donovan
1:44 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Go to the first link and find "Parsippany." Just below the description you'll find "download info and maps." Click on it. It will give you the second link, in a pdf format.
Renee
8:20 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The avg HH income calc in interesting.
(1) This comparison uses a 2000 census, whereas all the other data uses 2010. Maybe just a typo, but given the impact of the project on the town and citizens, I'd hope there wouldn't be typos for the plan.
(2) HH income growth from 2000 to 2011 is over 30%. Even in the economy we've had for those 10 yrs? Could the demographics of the area have changed so much as to push the HH income up that much? The doc says that 2011 is an 'estimate', I'd really want to see how that estimate is calculated.
Since the project seems to reference upscale shopping, it seems like a HH income would be a valid calculation to question and want transparency on.
Sick of the trolls
8:51 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Hey, "Clyde." I'm sorry I couldn't be here sooner, I was unexpectedly detained. So, I only have one question for you: what corrupt money? And whose hands? (Ok, two questions). Whose pocket are you in, or are you just so cantankerous that you hate everyone? (Damn, three questions.) One more thing (last one, I promise): if the Mayor and the Council were denying developers the right to develop land in Parsippany, would you be damning them for keeping jobs out of Parsippany, calling them Socialists because they refuse to allow business to operate unimpeded in the Township, and complaining because Mayor Barberio is balding?
(I know, I said it was the last one and it was more like two and a half because it was several parts and the last one wasn't really serious, it was more of a joke kind of question, but I still think you would find any reason to hate on Mayor Barberio no matter what he was doing, saying, or the state of the Township, so I figured I'd throw it in there. Please don't be mad. I was in the moment, and I went with it.)
mindy
1:13 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
i am against ANY further development in this town. i'm disgusted every year when our town earns the Tree City award...they should not only take into account how many trees we have, but how many we have cut down. i say leave ALL the undeveloped land, undeveloped. the same goes for the Krishna Temple that wants to go in on Troy Rd. Find someplace else.
Dave Phillips
1:40 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
It's disgraceful, but the mayor and some of the planning board want to turn the township in to another Union, Woodbridge or Clifton.
Chris
3:19 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Another one of those who wants to live in the past and resist change. You have to remember, the spot where your house is was once all tree's, too. Sorry lady, you have to move on. Things change, buildings are built. Time doesn't stop for you.
Arie
5:42 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Curious Chris, do you have anything to contribute other then your rather childish and sophomoric attacks> Or are you an employee of the developer just trolling here?
Chris
6:46 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
@arie. yes, I have tons to contribute. I actually think its quite childish that people move to a VERY populated area and but then NOT want any development or stores going up. They want to live in a nice area, that's close to shopping, but they don't want shopping to be built. They want to live where there are lots of tree's, but they also want to be close to everything.. so they knock down some tree's to build some nice stores. They want a short commute, but don't want anyone else to commute through their town. People seem to want everything... but they only want to use it themselves and don't want anyone else to come shop there, too. NIMBY
I think people should embrace change. Change is what keeps things fresh and modern. Change is what keeps this town, this county and this state better than any other state. If no new companies want to come here, this town would just get run down and look sh1tty. And of course if new stuff isn't being built and everything gets run down, what is that going to do to your property values. Its just going to drop, too.
But, what I am saying is... if you want to live in the heart of Morris County where everything is at your fingertips, you are going to have to deal with some change. If you want tree's and no traffic, well go live in Sussex County. There is a TON of open space up there, you won't be missed. But then go and try to get a job up there and see how easy it is. I am sure you won't fins a whole foods there either.
Kenneth Kaplan
6:28 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Your desire to halt all development goes against rights guaranteed in the Constitution. People who own property have the right to develop it. Our laws allow certain restraints on that, through zoning and otherwise, but you have no right to stop others from using their property.
Scott Dean
1:18 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
It seems like the Patch and its questions create an uneasy feeling to some of our elected officials by asking for such a responsible answer
The Truth...
Same reason people avoid Barbara Walters
Dave Phillips
1:44 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Yes, why does the mayor really want to the zoning changed from office building to an "over-lay" zone? The planning board has to see through this farce and do what's best for us township residents, not the developers and lawyers who will never step footn in Parsippany again after plowing down close to a thousand trees and choking our roadways.
Diane babicz
3:05 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Agreed. I was born and raised in Clifton and left to move to Parsippany where there are supposed to be more open spaces and room for our children to grow. I am disgusted that this project is being considered at all.
Reality Checker
1:39 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
This just goes to show how out of touch the town counsel and Mayor is with their constituents and reality. I am not going to play party lines here but it is time to say goodbye to this clueless bunch of people. Traffic is horrendous already -- try driving down to Pinebrook for a pizza and back to Intervale on a Friday evening say between 4-7 PM and be prepared to take 90 minutes to do so. Proposing a rezoning with traffic conditions being horrendous already shows me that Parsippany township is lacking leadership and common sense. As an Intervale resident I can say I will be more than happy to pack it in and move somewhere else that has local leaders with common sense before watching my quality of life deteriorate. But before I go I plan on making sure all these corrupt officials are voted out of office.
Chris
3:15 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Uhh... Traffic on a Friday between 4-7??? Are you one of the millions on welfare or unemployed??? Its called rush hour traffic. Mindblowing.
Plus, why would you go all the way to Pine Brook for Pizza if you live on Intervale. There are about 15 other pizza places on the way.
BUT, I agree with you that Parsippany has horrendous traffic problems and they need to deal with them first before any redevelopment.
Reality Checker
1:44 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I agree with Clyde -- this mayor is a joke... From storm response to this nonsense it shows how out of touch this mayor is with the community. Why on God's earth would you consider rezoning this area when the negatives clearly outweigh the positives and also I for one am not happy with Parsippany spending money even looking into such a ill conceived proposal...
Count us for two votes against the mayor and the current elected officials supporting this crazy notion. I think Elmer Fudd would even win a landslide election against this corrupt bunch of clowns.
Sick of the trolls
8:55 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
RC, how's it going bud? Haven't seen you in a while. Hey, why does it not surprise me at all that you agree with "clyde donovan?" I mean, for all we know, you probably ARE "clyde donovan," so it shouldn't, really. Know what else is a joke? The fact that you're not happy. Who are you? Why should we even care what you think about the Mayor or the Council or "clyde donovan?" And as for Elmer Fudd beating this "corrupt bunch of clowns," I'm sure your proof for that assertion is about as real as Elmer Fudd, so yeah, he probably could win a "landslide election," whatever that is.
clyde donovan
2:24 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
This Whole Foods/condo project is such high-density it would warm the heart of Ann Grossi. Reference: http://parsippany.patch.com/articles/planning-board-continues-work-on-272-parsippany-rd
This project certainly benefits Mountain Lakes. It absolutely does not benefit Parsippany.
Mountain Lakes stays residential and predominatley White by not zoning retail and lower income housing. Mountain Lakes gets the suckers in Parsippany, Denville and Boonton to build all they retail they need. Even the townhouses in this project are targeted toward people from Mountain Lakes who want to unload the big house but stay nearby.
Whole Foods pretends to be all about the enviroment. I guess they don't care about trees in Parsippany. "The more they tell you it isn't about the money, the more it is about the money," George Young, NY Giants, deceased.
A Whole Foods bs statement:
America’s Healthiest Grocery Store™
"Who are we? Well, we seek out the finest natural and organic foods available, maintain the strictest quality standards in the industry, and have an unshakeable commitment to sustainable agriculture. Add to that the excitement and fun we bring to shopping for groceries, and you start to get a sense of what we’re all about. Oh yeah, we’re a mission-driven company too." I guess their mission is to ruin your quality of life.
Natalie Davis
5:25 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
What does "white" have to do with anything, "Clyde"????
Sick of the trolls
9:07 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Don't bait him, Natalie. I got this.
Seriously, "Clyde?" You're bringing race into this? If you think Mountain Lakes is so much better for being "predominately White (SIC)", maybe you should move there and go troll them for a while.
Oh, and since when are you concerned about the environment? Weren't you just railing against solar panels at the library a few days ago? Make up your mind, man! (At least, I assume you're a man. Your name would imply that, so I'm sticking with it.) Whole Foods has done more to improve the environment in the last 5 minutes than you've done in your entire lifetime, all 900 years of it.
Oh, if we're throwing quotes now, I got one for you:
"Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. "
--Anonymous
Arie
9:46 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Clyde,
While I object to comments made by some off the responders, you obviously know very little about Mountain Lakes.. The whole Town is a planned community, with the planning completed decades ago. Even to build a new home in Mountain Lakes requires taking down an existing one due to the planning. Get the race card off the table. It demeans those opposing the development and totally obviates your comments as relevant.
Robert
2:26 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Furman
(RD Management LLC owner)
he is Goliath alright
clyde donovan
2:30 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I wonder if he's got any ties to Wilf/Mosberg? The condos are going to be developed by someone.
Robert
2:44 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
This may not be relevant for this development however Jay's son Jason was Obama's white house aide ( Jason Furman (born 1970) is an economist. On January 28, 2009, Furman was named Deputy Director of the National Economic Council in the administration of President Barack Obama, whom he'd been advising since the latter stages of the 2008 presidential campaign. )
http://www.nysun.com/national/an-ex-new-york-knife-juggler-to-hone-obamas-econ/80153/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Furman
Natalie Davis
2:56 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I do not believe there is a connection between RD and developers Mosberg and Wilf. Can't find any relationship yet. RD Management is indeed a huge, powerful company.
Robert
3:05 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Jay takes care of politicians for sure .. here you go .. all new york though
http://ns1.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=NY&last=FURMAN&first=JAY
Bob Crawford
2:27 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Perhaps the Mayor would be willing to break his silence and make a comment as to how much, if any, of our tax dollars has already been spent by the Township on this project. A lesson learned from the FOD experience was that Mayor Barberio felt empowered to spend thousands of dollars on legal fees in an effort to find the legal loopholes that would allow him to proceed with the FOD plan . A plan that he was eventually forced to abandon.
Arie
9:48 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
This mayor is not know for his "openness." Remember how he and the Council handled hiring a PR firm behind closed doors, attacked when confronted, and then was forced to rescind the offer. It is election year time. Let's hope the citizens of this town remember
Chris
2:55 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I would say that first, before any more development, Route 46 needs an upgrade, especially in the areas around smith road and those millions of traffic lights. Also, on weekends, 46 is slammed by Beverwyck and the other shopping plaza. If they are thinking of putting in more Shops, they need to fix the traffic problems on 46 first.
But, it is human nature for people to want to resist change. But people have to look at the big picture. More development and more growth is always better.
Natalie Davis
3:09 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Always?
Dave Phillips
3:45 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
"More development and more growth is always better."
That is simply not true.
Chris
4:08 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Usually is. I mean would you prefer Parsippany to still be all woods and pastures? I think all of you like living here, shopping here. That's why everyone is so passionate about what is going on in town. But, sorry to break it to you, this whole area was once woods, but now its built up.
I guess all this growth has been good... I mean, we all live in nice houses in a nice area and don't have to travel far at all to buy all those necessities that past growth and prosperity has allowed us to become accustomed to.
But, it seems like the main problem is traffic. It seems that before any additional property is built up, the town must deal with the traffic problem and lack of infrastructure that it currently has.
g
3:29 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
population growth = environmental destruction.
Arie
6:07 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
2013 IS an election year in Parsippany. For any of the current council AND the Mayor to try and ram through a project of this magnitude at this time borders on the criminal. At the very least, the Mayor's refusal to respond to questions indicates a rather callous disregard for the rights and sensibilities of the citizens of the Township. But it wouldn't be the first time.
As for Mr. Furman, let's also look at what the relationship is of Mr. Furman's son is to the Obama administration, having served as an adviser to the President. As a point of fact, BOTH Furmans are very heavily politically connected, which may serve to explain the Mayor's reticence at responding for fear of offending.
Robert
6:28 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
To your point .. if you want to find out what Jay Furman contributed ... go to this site
http://www.fec.gov/finance/disclosure/norindsea.shtml (Federal Election Commission)
and type "Furman" as last name .. see the money this family contributed He is using his family to contribute thousand of dollars to very powerful politicians ....
Arie
6:07 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
All that said, this project can wait until after the election; there is sufficient EMPTY space in town that can be re-purposed with needed traffic corrections (for example - the office park at Rt 202 and Rt 10 that is quickly emptying out or the office building on the edge of Rte 80 behind Blackthorne's that has been empty now for almost 25 years that can be changed into an indoor mall); the developer and NOT the taxpayers should be footing all the exploratory needs. Add to that, the added taxes required to school more children, hire more police, and improve fire equipment to contain such a development. No one appears to be concerned about that at the Town level, and I am sure the developers are counting on tax breaks, given their connections, to offset their expenses. WE, the taxpayers end up paying higher rates.
This project to succeed would require creativity if the developer is serious about it. Let them expense that creativity so that all the Town's residents benefit. Let them figure a method for the extra government revenue required for such a project. Let the Mayor speak out where he stands. Or this will become the opening salvo of the 2013 election season in Parsippany.
(OK Chris - this is where you chime in with another sophomoric attack)
Chris
6:59 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
No problem Arie. I am sure that the office space that is pushed wayyy in the back behind Blackthorn is a GREAT place for a Whole Foods. Its so visible from 46 and is in such a high traffic area.. how can they not succeed!
Businesses don't want to have to figure out how to be creative. They want to go with what works. They want high traffic area's that get the most people in and buying stuff. What gets the most profit for the least amount of expense. Being creative puts a HEAVY strain on resources ($$$). I mean, how many successful art students do you know?
Those stores that are empty are prob old buildings that are inefficient and are in poor locations. If they were good places for a store, their would have been one in there already. Obviously it would be cheaper to use existing space, but why move in when you are just going to lose money and be out of business months later?
Plus, if office space is quickly moving out, why would you want to build MORE office space? So that can sit empty for 25 years too????
But this is the problem. We have elected officials who are lawyers and career politicians and a general public that has NO business sense what-so-ever and they are the ones who are making the decisions.
Robert
6:37 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Jesse Furman, a nominee for the Southern District of New York, disclosed a net worth of $14.2 million, among the highest for Obama’s judicial nominees. He has spent much of his career in the Justice Department, most recently as the deputy chief appellate attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan. He’s worked on several high-profile cases, including the attempted prosecution of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/08/judicial-nominees-disclose-finances.html
now this is wow!
Robert
6:51 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gail_Furman (ex-wife )
This is like a soap opera ... it gets better and better ... Mr. Mayor reject this he is getting personal phone call from Mr. President.
Arie
9:35 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Robert, the last time we had drama like this over development was during Priore's reign (and I use that term purposely) and Powder Mill. That mayor went to jail. The bottom line here is that our Mayor and the Council are purposely (reasons to be determined) bypassing the citizens' demands. Several trolls posting (I would venture they are on the RD payroll) here are attacking everyone objecting to the development and chastising all suggestions. While many moved to Parsippany as a developed Township, the CITITZENS still have a say of where WE want the town moving forward. It is not up to RD to define to us how our town should be. And yes, the relationships between the management of RD and numerous well-placed politicians must be taken into account when reviewing the mindset of the elected officials.
EdC
8:34 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
This plot was meant to be developed, but the problem is that the current concept does not fit with the "Grand Design" that the council and residents have worked on (called the Master Plan, renewed every 10 years or so).
In other words, they would have less resistance if the developers were more sensitive to the local residents as well as respected the town's unique character in their design. Basically, they're building an eyesore to drain the local property values rather than trying to improve them.
Selfish? Probably, but as I have noted to others, I did not move here because I crave unchecked development. I would hope the largest town in the county could maintain some zoning discipline.
Nancy Choffo
10:00 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Unless you were at the latest meeting, you may not be aware that the Whole Foods already signed a lease. How can you sign a lease on a building that hasn't even been approved to build yet? Isn't that like putting the cart before the horse??? What insight does the developer have that would lead him to believe that this would be approved? These are far too many questions left unanswered!!!
Robert
7:12 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Reason they are so confident this will get this property build due to their connection (goes all the way to President of the United States). Ex-wife wine and dine with George Soros, Current wife does Jazz festivals and who's who of the entertainment world shows up. Owner of RD Management LLC Jay spent thousand of dollars contributing to democratic party every year. Son Jesse is Federal Court Judge appointed by Mr. Obama. Another son Jason was deputy economic adviser to Mr. Obama again. We little people have no chance winning this .. I hope I am wrong.
Nancy Choffo
7:57 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
It's just like having the Obamacare forced upon us. They don't know what's best for our town. We the taxpayers do. We know why we moved here and wanted to live here. We don't want Parsippany to change any more than it already has. We the taxpayers own this town and our voices need to be heard. We said NO! and NO means NO! We don't want to have the zoning changed! We don't want Whole Foods or any other stores built on this land! We the people are speaking! When will we be heard!
Annie
7:44 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
No matter how connected he is, if the town won't give tax concessions, they won't want the property. I realize this is a fantasy to think our town will not give tax concession, it is always about the money. Once this guy bulldozes his way through our town, he will move on to the next one without ever looking back.
Arie
9:30 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
@Chris: You don't like my suggestions as to where to develop yet all you do is criticize suggestions and attack the residents of Parsippany. Tell the truth - do you work for RD?
Arie
9:41 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Chris..do you hear yourself while writing?
Office space emptying out: Means Whole Foods and the owners of the large property adjoining 202 (VERY HEAVILY TRAFFICKED) can re-purpose space for Whole Foods to have theiir market as well as ancillary stores. No companies don't like to spend their own money being creative, but they do. It's called capitalism, the free market, and development. WE the taxpayers will not have the expense of their profit needs thrust upon us. Review other companies that have developed and they have their own staffs or outsource "creativity." I would venture that RD has such a staff. But I asked and I'll ask again - given you are happily critiquing and marginalizing everyone's comments - are you on the RD payroll? Are you an RD staffer? Be honest!
Robert
9:41 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Beside RD Management LLC - there is another company owned by Furman's family called MF EST LLC. Looks like money going from one company to another to may be to avoid taxes .... I try to understand MF Global (Owned by Jon Corzine went bankrupt) relationship with MF EST LLC. Meantime Furman's fortune read on.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/20090403whitehouseforms/Furman.pdf
Robert
9:48 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
MF global (Jon Corzine Company) when it went to bankrupt the case goes to Judge Jesse Furman court.) His father Jay Furman (RD Management LLC) gave campaign donation to Jon Corzine election .... hmmmm any want to guess what happened to this case ?
Robert
8:40 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
This project may be financed by Chinese. Look at 2nd page bottom (Jay Furman Patners - http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/vprr/07/9999999997-07-028198)
Beside (1) RD Management LLC
He has (2) MF EST LP
(3) MF EST LLC
(4) Jay Furman Patners
(5) American Securities China (B) LP
(6)American Securities Patners II LP
This thing is big! Money getting move around multiple companies and at the end who knows how much tax gets paid .... God Bless U S of A
Robert Steelman
5:17 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Dear Outraged Citizens
Calm down. I’m an “interested party”, please look it up. I don’t have a financial interest in the project. I don’t know if this project makes sense and you don’t either. This process plays out in nearly all NJ municipalities. It is wasteful of resources that should go toward reinvestment. It also fosters community mistrust. This applicant property owner has a right to make a presentation of facts. The public has a right to ask questions and present facts too. Elected officials and land use boards have a duty to hear facts and decide an outcome based on facts. No matter how out of control your emotions are, you don’t have a right to hijack the process. This is not a referendum. Protecting rights through due process is the only way to avoid flawed land use. And don’t put too much faith in a planner that trades vision for job security or in a master plan that can’t anticipate future conditions.
Robert Steelman, Broker, 4a Realty
Curt
3:44 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012
Dear Mr. Steelman,
What you wrote is true they have rights and we the citizens have rights. But if they bought the the property knowing that it was zoned for offices, then they should live with that. Not try to change the Master Plan that the local citizens bought houses thinking it would be offices. So I'm sure you could understand our frustration as our property values fall even further than the housing bubble created. People should not loose money on property they own while the newer land owner makes a larger profit. Your comments also seem callus and arrogant. I'm not sure if that was on purpose but non the less thats how you come across.
Reality Checker
3:14 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Realtors are like used car sales people... You sound so sensible from an overview but this is rotten and corrupt to the core. There is no reason to rezone this area and the only reason it is being considered is just like in the past there is some money changing hands and it is not benefiting the common residents of Parsippany. Go back to being a used car salesman as anyone with common sense knows this deal is corrupt and crooked to the core.
Sick of the trolls
3:55 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Now that's just not nice, RC. Used car salesmen are some of the nicest people I know, as are realtors. Are you bitter because you can't buy a car? Does somebody need a hug?
Robert
8:24 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Dear Robert,
Please put your money where your mouth is. Why don't you buy a house somewhere around intervale or mountain lakes boro and than tell us how you feel.
We understand their right to present to board and our right to protest. and board will do what they deem is right. We all are doing our part and you are doing your part (you may want to sale a gas station or restaurant once it build fine by us).
I would request you to start living next to 900 car parking lot, 4 AM delivery trucks humming, restaurants open up to 11 PM and who knows crime it will bring and than tell us don't get emotional.
Its zoned for office and we have no problem office getting build.
May force be with you
Par4theCourse
11:10 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Robert Steelman,
Who the hell are you to tell us how to act? Maybe that sanctimonious attitude works in Summit but as my fellow citizen states just above me, try living next to this project. It's clear you're just shilling to curry favor for some business, how about if this happens in Ridgewood, do you take the same stance?
Annie
8:01 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012
The current online tax records for the 26 acres, blk 421 & lot 29, says that Bellemead Dev Group/Chubb at 15 Mt. View Rd, Warren, NJ owns the property. Maybe these people will buy the property from Bellmead/Chubb if they can get the zoning changed. Is it possible this is all speculation, because I do not see the property being sold to anyone. I'm not an expert at looking at these records so I could be mistaken.
Julia Peterson
8:49 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Many times a land purchase is "contigent on zoning approval."
Julia Peterson
8:50 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012
"contingent" (sorry)
Robert
5:56 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
@Annie,
Great Info you found. I did some more digging ... one thing surprise me - this property assessment always going down every year .. How is this possible? Can town answer this?
Year Owner Land Assessment Building Assessment
2012 BELLEMEAD DEV CORP 2000000 0
2011 BELLEMEAD DEV CORP 4989000 0
2010 BELLEMEAD DEV CORP 4989000 0
2009 BELLEMEAD DEV CORP 7989000 0
http://njtaxrecords.net/r/waterview-blvd-parsippany-morris-county-nj-property-tax-record-2232460
Joan Callamezzo
1:26 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
@Robert
The reason the property value has gone down is because there is no demand for office space in Parsippany. If the property owner could make money by building an office building, they would build an office building. As it stands now, most office building properties in Parsippany are assessed much lower than they were 10 years ago. And guess what? When office buildings are worth less, residents will pay more in property taxes to pick up the shortfall. That's the way it goes.
Reality Checker
3:17 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
There is no way that office space values have dropped 75% since 2009. This is once again the township taking care of their buddies while raising everyone else's taxes.
Sick of the trolls
3:53 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Hey, RC, I'm sure you have proof to back that up, right? Your libelous comment there about the Township being corrupt and lowering the assessment on this land? I know you have documentation about that, right, and that's why you're afraid to post under your real name, because you think the corrupt Mayor is going to send his police goon squad after you so you use a pseudonym to release this outrageous news to the world for your own safety, not out of cowardice and shame. I'll just wait here until you can produce the evidence safely, I'm sure it will be a real eye opener.
Robert
5:44 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
10 Waterview blvd about 18 acre - right next to "Gas station/Restaurants/Whole Foods/Target/Liquor store/Panera/StarBucks" property This guy is paying close to $12 million compare to BelleMead 23 acre $2 Million..
taxes are follows
Year Owner Land Assessment
2012 MIREF WATERVIEW, LLC $11,925,300
2011 MIREF WATERVIEW, LLC $11,925,300
2010 MIREF WATERVIEW, LLC $13,925,300
2009 MIREF WATERVIEW, LLC $13,925,300
http://njtaxrecords.net/r/10-waterview-blvd-parsippany-morris-county-nj-property-tax-record-2232462
Kenneth Kaplan
8:27 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
There is a glut of office space in the market now and for the forseeable future. Two projects for this site have been turned down already. At some point, depriving the owner of the economic value of his property may reach the level of a constructive taking. According to USLEGAL.COM "Constructive taking is a term used in property law to refer to actions that amount to depriving an owner of the use and enjoyment of his/her property. The legal term “takings” refers to the physical acquisition of private property by governmental bodies. It also applies when government regulation removes all economically viable use of private property in what the courts describe as a “regulatory” or “constructive” taking. The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires that private property cannot be taken for public use unless there is just compensation.
A constructive taking falls short of physical seizure or possession. It is a legal fiction, based on fairness principles, to apply to a situation that is tantamount to physical deprivation of possession. For example, a zoning regulation that deprives the land owner of the economic value of the property might be challenged as a constructive taking."
At some point, if continually turned down for viable projects, the owners could sue the town for "just compensation." That would result in higher taxes instead of an upscale ratable that could increase our tax base and lower taxes for home owners, while creating many jobs.
Dave Phillips
9:43 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Mumbo umbo Kenny, they would never win such a suit and you know it.
"Upscale" ratable, laughs. They are getting tax breaks, the project will not lower anyone's taxes in town and the jobs will all be low paid/minimum wage with people from urban cities (Paterson/Newark) being bused in.
John
10:09 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Kenny,
There's also a glut of unused retail space in Parsippany as evidenced by the vacancies on Route 46 and Route 10. As for "depriving" the owner of economic value - the owner participated in the current zoning for this property that was established over 30 years ago when they wanted to develop the land. The neighbors, land owner, and township worked together to agree on the current zoning for the property.
I've lived in Parsippany for the past 20 years. During that time, developer after developer have appeared before the town council with high density building projects and the same promise - "approve my project and the township will benefit from the tax revenue it will bring in!" The town "leaders" salivated over the increased taxes but were too short sighted to realize the increased services that resulted from these projects. Despite all the high density building and increased revenue over the years, my taxes have never gone down. Instead, my taxes have steadily gone up (to pay for things like school expansions, more police, road maintenance, etc.) while the quality of life and education services have gone down.
Kenneth Kaplan
1:09 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
John,revenues have increased, but not as fast as our town government squandered them. It seems the town is always involved in suits with township personnel: police officers, school officials, administrative oficials. Our local government is a mess.
Nancy Choffo
10:20 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Yes Bellemead owns the land. They lease it to RD Reality so that they can build the stores. RD Reality then leases the building to Whole Foods and other retailers. It's a triple lease and it is commonly done. Bellemead did not sell the land if the building burnt to the ground Bellemead loses nothing.
Robert
11:46 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Kenneth Kaplan,
Your argument doesn't work. BELLEMEAD DEV CORP bought this property in 1987. For 25 years they sat on this property for whatever reasons. They could have made a killing if they developed offices in late 80s. Fast forward to internet days and all office around Parsippany or around suburban USA will never achieve 70 to 80% occupancy rate and future trend not looking promising.
If I were you, I will start looking for another job because working for Belle Baby or Furman Fairy (aka RD Development or Chinese company) won't last too long.
Parsippany approved on November 23rd 2010 Land assessment from almost $8 Million to $5 million and can't find record from $5 Million to now $2 Million.
Page 17 : http://www.parsippany.net/web_content/acrobat/minutes/rmeeting112310.pdf
Kenneth Kaplan
1:06 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Your insults and false accusations have no place in this discussion I do not work for the developer and have no financial interest in this matter. Is Furman Fairy supposed to be some slur against homosexuals? Shame on you!
Nancy Choffo
11:59 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Bellemead is the current owner of this land. They are probably entering into a triple lease. They have done this in the past. Bellemead owns the land and will lease it to RD and they will build on it and lease the building to Whole Foods and other retailers. I don't believe that Bellemead is selling the land. They are still in business under the Chubb Corporation.
Joan Callamezzo
1:38 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Parsippany is not giving any tax breaks to the have this property developed. Commercial property is assessed differently from residential property. An office building pays taxes based on the rent it is able to charge. RIght now, because of the many vacancies, office rental space is very cheap. If another office building is built on the site, that would only create more inventory and lower rents across town. If this property is eventually approved, the taxes it would generate would be much greater than any single office building could ever generate.
Curt
10:00 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Joan and Tom,
If you lived in the area your opinions might be different. Any new revenue will just be squandered by our politicians, probably to keep up with the extra infrastructure needed for this project. Why the extra density building? Why three story buildings? Maybe if the developers were more reasonable, the residents would also be! Tom insulting people who care about there property values just belittles you
Reality Checker
3:22 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Joan -- what school did you go to. You math doesn't add up. After the township picks up the bill for the new roads, crowding of schools, and the residents pick up the bill for additional lost time for traffic congestion and decreased home values those taxes wont even put a slight dent in that expense to the current residents. There is absolutely NO reason this should be approved for rezoning...
Tom
12:22 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
I support the idea! People are just to much, some of you have nothing to do.