Waterview RDR still breaking the Law. Allowing three minutes for experts to speak is ridiculous. For the rest of us How can 3 minutes be sensible if they don't know how many people; will speak?. The limit should stem from irrelevant, immaterial and unduly repetitious evidence. The Developer has already violated the Land Use Law Title 40:55D-10 Hearings. In that their witness was not allowed cross examination and did not display proper maps, show boundaries of wetlands and wetland transition zone. No relevant evidence was forthcoming on the developers part on how the adjacent lands would be impacted; Their Science consulting report dated 2/15/15 was flawed as not allowed to be shown in public or discussed as to its inaccuracies or assumptions. The public was disenfranchised. RDR moved on to the next step.What kind of Town is this? Remember the developer, RDR stated they are Thoroughly and deliberately determined to deliver this development even without our consensus .This bully tactic was sanctioned by the Mayor and Planning Board.