Christie Touts Recovery, Continued Momentum in Budget Address

The governor presented his $32.9 billion budget for fiscal year 2014.

Progress is evident. Momentum is building.

As he laid out his $32.9 billion proposed budget for fiscal year 2014 at the Statehouse Tuesday, Gov. Chris Christie said the state’s future, both economically and in recovery following Hurricane Sandy, is moving in the right direction.

With talk of compromise and bipartisanship — as well as a few customary jabs at former governor Jon Corzine’s administration — Christie called on the state’s Legislature to keep it going, to make the conscious decision to help New Jersey return to a position of prosperity it once knew.

Of course it will do so with the help of funding from the federal government.

Included in the governor’s proposed budget is just $40 million in supplemental aid for Sandy-related recovery efforts. And the Sandy funding is last resort funding, stopgap aid aimed only at bridging the delay gap between recovery projects and anticipated federal aid.

When it comes to making New Jersey whole again after being devastated by Sandy, the bill is being laid directly at the feet of the federal government with the hopes that its $50.7 billion in relief aid will cover the tab.

“In the past year, of course, our economy has been challenged by Superstorm Sandy. In the face of this unprecedented emergency, we have stood together,” Christie said during his address.

The proposed $40 million “contingency fund” will be used for expenses not reimbursed by the federal government. The funding, he said, will allow small business to reopen and infrastructure improvements to go ahead as planned as the state waits for federal aid.

According to New Jersey Treasurer Andrew Sidamon-Eristoff, the supplemental aid could also be distributed to towns in need throughout the state by the Department of Community Affairs, though only as a final option. Municipalities have been instructed to send their requests for recovery aid or emergency cost reimbursements directly to the federal government.

In his 45-minute presentation, one that received several standing ovations from both Republicans and Democrats, Christie lauded what he said is a record amount of funding for schools, greater pension contributions, and the presentation of a balanced budget with no tax increase for residents.

Begrudgingly, Christie also announced the state’s expansion of its Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare. Though he said he doesn’t approve of the bill, Christie said, as law, participation is necessary because it represents what’s best for New Jersey’s citizens.

Praised by state Republicans but chided as unrealistic by state Democrats, Christie’s budget could be significantly altered, some say, based on the actions of President Barack Obama and the U.S. House of Representatives. Should Congress and the White House fail to reach a compromise on budget cuts by this Friday, March 1, the U.S. would enter a sequestration.

Sequester would prompt significant funding cuts in federal aid, including trimming the $50.7 billion Sandy relief package only just approved by Congress in January. Funding for programs such as U.S. Housing and Urban Development’s Community Develop Block Grant program, which will be used to help residents in New Jersey rebuild and elevate their homes after Sandy, would be reduced.

If that’s the case, some worry the $40 million in Christie’s budget for contingency Sandy aid might not be enough.

State Sen. Linda Greenstein, D-14, said she believes the contingency fund is a good move by the governor. A member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, she said even if New Jersey sees every penny of the federal aid package its been promised, there might still be funding holes that need to be plugged. Seeing the aid package cut do to sequestration, however, could wind up costing New Jersey a lot more in its recovery effort.

“If sequestration goes through, no, (the $40 million) wouldn’t be enough,” she said. “I have a feeling if sequestration goes through we’re in some trouble.”

Jack Q March 04, 2013 at 01:12 PM
Really, Stew. And the Prez's cabinet stating that the end of the world was coming if we go through with the sequestor that he came up with? That wasn't propaganda, along with factually inaccurate. Even the media is finally waking up and confronting the Obama admin and the spin is dizzying.
The Stig March 04, 2013 at 01:30 PM
Don't have to imagine it, it happened, only the Republican president's choice was voted down. In 1988 George Bush won an 8% victory, and CRUSHED Dukakis in the EC by 4:1. Bush nominated former Senator John Tower as his choice for Sect of Defense, but senators like Ted Kennedy claimed he was unfit because he was an alcoholic and a womanizer (what HYPOCRISY), and rejected the nomination. So don't talk about "sinking lower," every time the Reps drop a notch they are still looking down at the Liberal Dems, who wrote the playbook on dirty pool. Ironically, Bush's second choice was Dick Cheney, who used the fame gained from managing the DOD during the First Gulf War into his eventually spot as Veep for GWB. Sometimes unintended consequences are a B#$*@.
Ojo Rojo March 04, 2013 at 01:32 PM
Yeah go ahead and shoot the messenger b/c you don't like the message. Still doesn't change the fact that Obama doesn't need Congressional authority to not spend money that is appropriated. He can do that all by himself and he hasn't. He also hasn't proposed any substantial cuts. All the man has done is pass 2 massive tax increases and now he wants a 3rd. Well he isn't getting one b/c he already agreed that after that last tax increase that the next round of deficit reduction would come from cuts and the Republicans aren't going to just let him reneg like that. So if you just don't like the sequester or any of the highly visible symbolic or inconvenient cuts Obama is making b/c he refuses to find ways to cut spending that soften the blow on the public, then take it up with the man you worship blindly b/c he alone is to blame for not only proposing the sequester but also for refusing to make any spending cuts until forced to by the sequester.
stewart resmer March 04, 2013 at 01:39 PM
here jack-o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMzd40i8TfA
paul smith March 04, 2013 at 01:39 PM
@Kevin- he was quoted as accusing a "Jewish lobby" of intimidating people in Washington, while he said he regretted those comments it was still said- In terms of Iran, their "democratically elected government" endorsed him I guess based on the fact that he said "the Obama administration supports “containment”" and called the country an “elected legitimate government.” First it should not be containment but prevention and if you look at the last Iranian election and resultant riots, I would put their election on par the the North Korean elections. Just the same, he's in and let's hope he does the right thing.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »