Ethical Wrongdoing Complaint Against Mayor Denied

Local Finance Board rules James Barberio's plea for friend's son was a 'personal letter.'

Mayor James Barberio was not out of line to send a letter to a Superior Court judge asking for leniency in a drug case involving the son of a friend last year, according to a ruling from the state Department of Community Affairs' Local Finance Board in response to a complaint lodged against Parsippany's chief executive.

The body, however, failed to address the mayor's use of official township letterhead for what the LFB characterized in its denial to the complainant as "a personal letter."

The issue arose in October 2011, when Barberio wrote a letter on behalf of his friend's son, Daniel Moses, who awaited sentencing after his guilty plea to charges of conspiracy to distribute eight pounds of marijuana. 

Moses, then 26, ultimately was sentenced by Morris County Superior Court Judge David H. Ironson to five years in prison, with an option for parole in one year.

At the Nov. 22, 2011, Township Council meeting, the mayor was hit with sharp criticism. Resident Roy Messmer chided Barberio for sending the letter on town letterhead.

Railing against drug abuse in the township before the council, Messmer stated his disapproval of defending a confessed drug offender.

"This does not represent the citizens of Parsippany," Messmer told the mayor.

At the time, attorney Justin Marchetta, filling in for and using notes by Township Attorney John Inglesino, said the letter was "legal, ethical and appropriate."

Open government activists were not satisfied with Inglesino's legal opinion, and one took action.

In January 2012, John Paff, who chairs the New Jersey Libertarian Party's Open Government Advocacy Project, filed a complaint with the Local Finance Board. Paff alleged that Barberio violated a state law that says “[n]o local government officer or employee shall use or attempt to use his official position to secure unwarranted privileges or advantages for himself or others."

In a letter dated Nov. 21, Local Finance Board Chairperson Thomas H. Neff disagreed with Paff's contention.

"Mayors have no direct statutory involvement with the selection of Superior Court judges or county prosecutors," Neff wrote, adding that "elected officials do not, upon taking office, give up their right to support friends and neighbors that other community members may provide." 

The board ultimately dismissed Paff's complaint, saying it had "no factual basis."

Patch has requests for comment in to the mayor and to Paff.

The complaint and the Local Finance Board's response are available online.

clyde donovan December 11, 2012 at 04:00 AM
This decision is a prime example of why the public considers New Jersey the most corrupt state in the nation.
Selene December 11, 2012 at 04:37 AM
Politics are dirty and nasty and always will be. Politicians are immoral because they constantly bend and stoop to achieve their goals. They never maintain the high ground of honesty and integrity because they serve too many masters. The best in our society is clearly NOT the the mayor, or the governor or the senator or the president. The best in our our society is the concerned citizen who speaks out against injustice. The best in our society is the citizen who constantly pushes for freedom, honestly, integrity and the welfare of the poor and weak. The worst in our society is not the politician but the citizen who sits back and does nothing.
Sick of the trolls December 11, 2012 at 12:54 PM
Yeah, "clyde", I'm sure you know all about it. Which conspiracy theory are we going with this week? I know: the Mayor was actually the one who fronted the money for the marijuana, that's why he stepped up to help this kid, right? But then Gyp Rosetti made a move for his territory and so Mayor Barberio had to go to the mattresses in order to flush him out with his friend Arnold Rothstein. Sound about right?
midnite54 December 11, 2012 at 01:23 PM
i think this mayor is going to end up in the other MAYORS hang out in pennsylvina
Par4theCourse December 11, 2012 at 02:22 PM
Selene: Wow! That is one of the best posts I've read. You nailed it.
Harland December 11, 2012 at 06:13 PM
Hey Troll, Based on your comment, I guess you think the mayor acted in a responsible manner? Personally, I think this is just one more example of our mayor exercising horribly poor judgement. The Local Finance Board may have found this action to be "ethical and appropriate". Let's see what the voters think next year when the mayor is up for re-election.
Mark December 11, 2012 at 08:57 PM
I could care less what letterhead he used. The issue is that he asked for leniency for this guy, which I have no problem with if that's what he believes. Whether I or anyone else agree with that is irrelevant. But instead of defending himself with some conviction and standing behind the decision, the mayor came out later and claimed he did not ask for leniency. If you read the letter, it is crystal clear that he did. It was as blatant a lie as any elected official could possibly tell.
Mikey December 16, 2012 at 11:04 PM
Maybe he could have his friends son join the police department. The town could always use a new sergeant!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something