News Alert
Morris County Man Convicted of Murdering Wife…

Mayor to BOE: Is Turf Field Plan Going Forward?

If you have something to express, send Patch a Letter to the Editor at natalie.davis@patch.com.

The following is an open letter sent to the from Mayor James Barberio regarding the long-debated high school turf field proposal.

Last December, representatives of my administration and I attended a meeting of the Board of Education to publicly propose the concept of a joint partnership initiative between the Parsippany-Troy Hills municipal government (the “Township”) and the Board of Education for a turf fields project.

The concept is very straightforward—the Township needs more fields and the Board of Education needs to improve its fields. My view is, that by working together, we could structure a partnership whereby this project could become a reality for our community without raising taxes.

That would be a win-win situation. Our kids would all benefit from this terrific project and the taxpayers would not be forced to pay any more of their hard-earned dollars to fund it.

The structure of the partnership was worked out and agreed to by the lawyers for both the Township and Board of Education and works as follows:

The Township would fund the project with existing and future open space/recreation trust fund dollars, and in exchange, the Township would obtain a conservation easement and usage of the fields.

The conservation easement is a legal requirement which enables the Township to use open space/recreation trust funds. The Township would be able to use the fields 51 percent of the time and the schools would be able to use the fields 49% of the time.

A shared services agreement would need to be negotiated addressing scheduling and numerous ancillary issues. But the fundamental pieces of the partnership were agreed to as outlined above. In fact, back in December 2011, the Board of Education voted unanimously to proceed with the partnership based on structure I have just outlined.

In order to be confident that our partnership structure would be approved by the state, legal counsel for the Board of Education sent a letter to the Department of Education back on Dec. 19, 2011. That letter confirms the partnership structure I just described.

Specifically, the Board of Education’s counsel states, “The mechanism we propose to accomplish the mutual goal of the Township and the Board of Education, while complying with all applicable statutory requirements, is the granting of a conservation easement by the Board of Education to the Township whereby the turf fields would be preserved as open space and for recreation, with public outdoor recreation (i.e. Township programs, etc.) provided at least 51 percent of the time in each calendar year.”

That letter, written by the Board of Education’s attorney, accurately states the agreement I made with our Board of Education last December. Again, that agreement was unanimously approvedby the Board of Education.

The state has recently responded to the Board of Education attorney’s letter. The Township attorney and the Board of Education’s attorney interpret the State’s response to be favorable and encouraging.

All systems should be go. We should be meeting with the Board of Education, furthering our agreement to provide new fields for our children with no tax increase to our residents.

Last week, I met with representatives of the Board of Education to begin discussions on a shared services agreement. Unfortunately, that meeting did not go well. The Board of Education representatives did not have any interest in discussing a shared services agreement, but rather, surprisingly expressed reservations about proceeding forward in the manner they had previously agreed to.

I am aware that this matter will be discussed at Thursday’s Board of Education meeting.

The issue for the Board of Education is clear—does it want to partner with the Township to do the turf fields project previously agreed upon without raising taxes? Or, does the Board of Education desire to forego its partnership with the Township and ask the voters to increase their taxes for the project?

I respectfully await the Board of Education’s decision.

James R. Barberio
Mayor, Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills

Chris May 09, 2012 at 03:12 PM
The Mayor is correct to put this in the lap of the BOE. This has been out there for over 6 months. Why let it linger if they never wanted the conservation easement? No matter what happens there is still the state of the fields to consider. What is going to be done? Agree or disagree with the use of the OSTF, things can't remain the same. I challenge anyone to find a HS in all of North Jersey whose grounds are in worse shape than ours. Please, let me know where it is. I have been to many other High Schools in Morris, Sussex, Passaic and Bergen Counties. I support this project because it addresses a real problem. When other schools come here to play and get back on the bus and go home, isn't that an embarrassment to us all? When visitors to our schools make statement that I have heard like , "this is your field?, It's a disgrace", you have to wonder why. The bottom line is that the Mayor presented a solution to the BOE. Some agree and some do not agree with the method, but as a leader he proposed a solution. Now it's up to the BOE to make a decision. Either way the BOE has to step up to the plate and do something and not just the usual quick fix patch job that we are all sick and tired of. Weeds that have grown into trees throughout all the old rusty broken fences, parking lots that are cracked and lifting and rusty old storage trailers all about the property. Oh yeah..and playing fields that are compacted, swampy and in sad shape. Let's not forget those.
VietNam Vet May 10, 2012 at 04:15 AM
I would still like to know, What is in it for the Mayor and Inglisino to pull something as crooked as this farce of a deal? I have never seen such underhandedness and coruption in my life as this crooked deal this town is trying to push past unsuspecting people. If this town doesn't wake up and protest or do something to stop this raping of the OSTF for their own personal gains then you all desrve just what they are running past you, a bunch of BS.
VietNam Vet May 10, 2012 at 04:22 AM
Kelly, they don't want this to go to a vote from the townspeople because they already know that they won't be able to shove it down our throats and try to pass it off as something good for the people. This only works out to be good for the mayor and the BOE because they get to keep the $ 5m. they had last year as a surplus and then raise our taxes again and tell us how bad they need that money, " That its all for the children" and hope again that you fall for their BS once again...
Robert Simpson May 11, 2012 at 01:47 AM
Mayor Barberio,Inglisino, and the Council are in the process of changing the OSTF so they can use the money for anything they want. They denied that, but it was shown to them in black and white.
VietNam Vet May 11, 2012 at 11:24 PM
Robert, you are so right, they changed the wording so it lets the Mayor use the money for whatever he wants and whenever he wants, so how long will it take before town workers are at the mayor's house for whatever he wants. I wish I could do that and have as much money as I want, whenever I feel like it.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »