.

Temple Application Remains Unresolved

The long-running ZBA deliberation continued as the applicant late in the game asks to amend plan to request another variance.

There still is no resolution in the International Society of Krishna Consciousness' bid to win Zoning Board of Adjustment approval to proceed with its plan to construct a house of worship in the area of Baldwin and Troy roads. The board heard testimony from two witnesses at its Wednesday meeting before deciding to carry the application over to its April 3 meeting.

The matter has been deliberated for more than three years. A host of opponents have resisted the erection of a temple, among them owners of historic homes in the area and businesses such as Baldwin Ventures. They say the ISKCON plan would erode their quality of life and bring noise and traffic to an already congested area. 

Wednesday's session began with a request from Robert Garofalo of Garofalo and O'Neill, the law firm representing ISKCON. Garofalo asked the board whether his client could amend its application to add a variance request regarding the proposed temple's parking lot, which would sit in the property's front yard.

Garofalo said a previous witness, professional planner John McDonough, testified that a variance would not be needed for the parking lot. Upon reflection, however, those representing the religious group decided to request the variance in case the planner's opinion was incorrect.

Opposition attorney Gary Hall objected to the request.

"The applicant's case rested in May," he said. "Their planner said you don't need a variance. I flagged the issue and got ignored by everyone.

"It's a little late in the day for that," Hall continued. "At some point you have to stick by your case. They didn't ask for a variance, they rested their case and then at the 11th hour, they ask for one?"

Garofalo defended his request.

"This board has dealt with applications for reconsideration before," he said. "As a quasi-judicial body, you have the right and obligation to reconsider."

Board attorney George Johnson seemed inclined to agree,

"There's a difference between completing your case and resting," he said. "I would suggest we consider the application to amend the application to add a variance for parking in the front yard and interpretation for why the variance is needed. ... The applicant must be sure that he's covered all bases in case a variance is needed."

With that, the board voted to grant Garofalo's request and testimony resumed. The applicant's lawyer called his first witness for the night, landscape architect Nicholas Gakos.

Gakos addressed questions regarding a portion of proposed temple site that is designated as a wetlands buffer and transition area. 

The landscape designer said the applicant is prepared to make plan adjustments in an effort to obscure the parking lot.

"We've provided more screening," Gakos explained. "We have evergreen native juniper rows in a natural formation going parallel to the parking lot. There are native grasses [and] native pin oak (a shade tree) to add another layer of canopied buffer. To give it more ornamental flair, a native Sweet Bay magnolia would tie the new shade trees in combination with existing shade trees. The rest would be a meadow seed mix, non-maintained by mowing, to prevent sedimentation and runoff and stabilize the exiting soil." 

He added that there would be no problem with implementing any recommendations Parsippany's Parks and Forestry Department might have.

The next bit of testimony highlighted a difference of opinion between the applicant and the opposition.

Garofalo's final witness of the night, architect Yogesh Mistry, testified that in his opinion the proposed temple would be a two-story building. The opposition insists that the structure would have three stories.

"The building is two levels, a lower level and an upper level," Mistry said."Within those floors there is a mezzanine or intermediate level that does not count as a story." 

The architect said he defines the stories as the larger volumes.

"There is no clear definition of mezzanine in the ordinance, but it's common practice in the building code for... mezzanines not to count as stories."

Mistry said that the mezzanine level is intended to serve purely as a support space, which according to the ordinance is a building area used for storage, for containing utility equipment or as a parking garage. Plans to include a shower area and lockers for temple devotees in the intermediate area would be scrapped so that the entire space is given to storage and can more clearly meet the requirements of the law and be defined as support space and not as additional stories.

"I define this as a two-story building," Mistry asserted.

Attorney Gary Hall asked whether that assertion was the architect's personal opinion. Mistry answered yes, based on years of experience.

Jeff Jones of Baldwin Ventures asked Mistry whether there were windows on the first floor.

The architect said yes.

"The lower mezzanine: Is there a set of windows on that level?"

"Yes."

Jones continued. "On the second level, or third level, as I call it, is there a set of windows you can see?"

Mistry again answered in the affirmative.

"On the upper mezzanine, is there a set of windows there?"

Once more, the architect was compelled to answer yes.

Lawyer Garofalo offered a tidy bit of redirect.

"Is there any law that prohibits windows at intermediate level?" he asked Mistry.

"No," the architect replied. 

With that, the board adjourned, carrying the ISKCON application to April 3.

Pete February 21, 2013 at 03:00 PM
Is this a case of "letting the camel's nose inside the tent" ? Once IN there, who will regulate what they DO there ? Let's not forget that ISKCON is the organization whose followers, back in the 60s and 70s, were chanting and "selling" incense in Grand Central Station. Now, THIS particular group may not have any connection with that -- it seems to have been a peculiarly American manifestation -- but some assurances that we won't have a flood of chanting, cymbal-clinking youngsters in our precious strip-malls.
Pete February 21, 2013 at 04:12 PM
Edit: "... but LET'S HAVE... some assurances...
Jeff DeBrito February 21, 2013 at 04:38 PM
Although i have not been following ISKCON's new temple proposal I was enticed to write reading Pete's comment. Not sure from what Era Pete is but i belong to 60's and 70s' era and have been fortunate to run into the Hare Krishna's, I personally know at least one friend from that era who just by receiving one of their books at an airport and reading and taking up the teachings gave up some of the many bad habits and addictions. My nephew who is only 21 and lives in LA, last year started going to the Hare Krsna temple there gave up his 3 yrs of addiction to drugs, after spending tons of $ on therapys and rehabs that did not work. So all in all, before folks talk nonsense about any paths must get their facts right and this article was not about how a religion or organization is...its disappointing when someone takes it to such low level and makes it political and mileads and creates negatives amongst the heart of the wonderful souls. Please keep this discussion clean.
Gorney Tye February 21, 2013 at 04:55 PM
The Hare Krishna are good people. Do yourself a favor and look up their teachings and values and EDUCATE yourself first before you judge. This 3 year back and forth is disgusting. This is not the doing of real Americans, this is outright discrimination. If it was a Christian group, there would be no question. This is 2013 people.
Ram Sharan February 21, 2013 at 06:18 PM
I been to ISKCON temple for some years and have found so many positive changes in my life and my family. The congregation members has always been wonderful. They have very wonderful teaching and practice and I am 100% sure they will always leave the positive impact in parsippany area and will be great assist. It is big loss of Parsippany to keep them for so long.
Nick Jones February 21, 2013 at 06:19 PM
I thought America was/is the land of the free where everyone should be given the right to practice their religon of choice. This case clearly demonstrates how our current system discrimnates against minorities. If someone was going to build another strip mall with restaraunts, shops and so forth they probably would not see much opposition - but when someone wants to build a place where people can go and pray and think about what is really important in their lives then we get the "not in my backyard" attitude. It is a shame that in modern day America people are so opposed to organizations that are striving to give people some real spiritual values and real ways in which they can improve their lives.
Natalie Davis (Editor) February 21, 2013 at 07:47 PM
Pete, do you believe the activities of all faith communities should be regulated by the government? And in a nation governed by the First Amendment, do people have the right to chant and clink cymbals if they are so inclined so long as they are not disturbing the peace? And if you believe they should be governed, how about, for example, the Christian Salvation Army bell ringers that must be endured in strip malls and elsewhere, even though some find it annoying? What's the difference?
Robert S February 21, 2013 at 09:53 PM
There is a Hare Krishna temple in Montville not far from Parsippany. I dont like same cast of lawyer and planner invloved who wants to build Waterview "Target"
Mary Lynn February 22, 2013 at 05:49 AM
I have never realized that our town is taking so long to approve the community of very wonderful people. I have a friends in my office and some family in my neighborhood from this Hare Krishna community. I appreciate their wonderful quality, vegetarian and friendly people. I don't understand why our township is taking so long. They preach very wonderful quality and have seen living with them. Our township should accept the temple application as soon as possible.
Scott Dean February 22, 2013 at 01:06 PM
Mary Lynn, I agree it is continually boasted as a Township that is so diverse,I cant imagine the amount of money wasted prolonging this decision,delay after delay,demand after demand.Dealing with some of these boards in Parsippany is like banging your head against a wall,maybe thats the idea if you bang your head long enough you will either give up or conform to the opposite side of thinking.
Julia Peterson February 22, 2013 at 01:33 PM
At issue in this proposal is NOT the value of the Hare Krishna sect: it is the proposal of a very large building on a small lot in a residential area, and in an area that is very "traffic challenged" (opposite the PAL building on two small roads.) The lot is small enough that it prevents adequate screening from neighboring houses. The hearings have gone on forever, partly because the plans have changed many times and the process has been very complicated. Citizens who live in the area have still not been afforded the opportunity to comment. These proceedings are quasi-legal: they proceed like a court case and the Board of Adjustment is bound by state and local law, even though it is a volunteer body.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something