Column: Who Wouldn't Want a Tax Cut?

The bigger question: How would New Jersey pay for it?

In his message last week, Gov. Chris Christie proposed cutting income taxes 10 percent across the board for all New Jerseyans.

What great news! Who wouldn’t want a tax cut?

The average Morris County household, with a taxable income of $96,950, would eventually pay $402 less in taxes under Christie's proposal. The cut would amount to $118 in Passaic on $45,527 in income, and $210 in Sussex on $64,197.

Those are the figures for the eventual annual savings after three years, when the full cut takes effect. The typical Morris household, then, could expect about a $134 windfall (a cup of coffee at Dunkin' Donuts or so a week) next year if the cut is approved, which is a big if at the moment.

The full 10-percent cut would buy about nine tanks of gas at current prices, depending on the size of the car. Two weeks of groceries for a family of four with teenage boys. Or a new flat screen TV, though not a big one.

To Republicans, it's an economy booster: Give people more money and it'll trickle down.

“The governor does not buy into the ‘Robin Hood’ economics of some legislators, but he clearly understands that our economy will improve by cutting taxes responsibly.” said Assemblyman Gary Chiusano, R-Sussex and Morris, and a member of the Assembly’s budget committee. He noted Christie twice vetoed Democratic attempts at renewing the recently expired tax on millionaires.

To Democrats, the governor’s proposal is unfair.

A graduated income tax is widely viewed as the most equitable because it is based on one's ability to pay. The Dems would rather see tax relief provided in a similar way.

But this cut would give a much smaller benefit, both in dollars and proportionally, to the lowest-income residents.

According to statistics from the Assembly Democratic office, a taxpayer with $30,000 in income would pay about $46 less in taxes under Christie’s proposal. Do the math and it works out to be .15 percent of income.

But someone with $250,000 would get .48 percent of income in savings, or $1,188, from a 10 percent tax cut.

According to the most recent Statistics of Income report by the state treasurer’s office, which includes data for 2009, more than a third of Morris County income tax returns had gross incomes of $30,000 or less, while 11 percent were totaled $200,000 or more.

“The governor’s math is seriously flawed,” declared Assemblyman Vincent Prieto, D-Hudson and the new chair of that house’s budget panel. “The governor continues on his crusade to further enrich millionaires, while ignoring his obligation to the residents who are in most need of our assistance.”

But millionaires—numbering more than 1,500 in Morris in 2009—won’t stand for higher taxes, the GOP contends.

The state treasurer’s office last fall released a report that found “small but significant” effects of different marginal tax rates on moving patterns.

Extrapolating, it estimated 20,000 taxpayers and $2.5 billion in annual income left New Jersey following tax rate increases in 2003 and the “millionaires’ tax” in 2004.

Of course, other studies have contradicted that, saying people move mostly due to jobs and the weather.

Democratic leaders have agreed to review Christie’s proposal and are particularly interested in learning where the money will come from to pay for the tax cuts.

That’s a very good question that the governor has yet to answer. He hasn’t even disclosed the cost.

His current budget anticipates $11.1 billion from the income tax. That mean a 10 percent tax cut would cost $1.1 billion. And shortly after Christie’s announcement, his treasurer’s latest revenue estimates put the state $325 million below what New Jersey had anticipated for the first six months of the year.

So those who think the tax cut is a good idea should explain how the state will pay for it.

Colleen O'Dea is a writer, editor, researcher, data analyst, web page designer and mapper with almost three decades in the news business. Her column appears Mondays.

This column appears on Patch sites serving communities in Morris County. Comments below may be by readers of any of those sites.

Pete Sesnick January 25, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Diane, Your comment ignores the fact that here in the United States the most successful among us pay a disproportionate share of the expense required to support the less successful among us. You obviously don't grasp the concept of the progressive income tax, so there's no point in continuing this discussion thread. I hope you enjoy life in your socialist fantasy land. May reality never intrude upon it.
Pete Sesnick January 25, 2012 at 01:04 PM
Dan, Your comments are typical of a leftist with no cogent response to the points raised by someone with an opposing point of view: You change the subject, you introduce irrelevancies, you obfuscate the issue. I will not take the bait. I will not play your game. I will not waste my time.
Sir January 25, 2012 at 04:22 PM
Unfortunately there are now too many people in the waggon and too few people pulling it. Stop the food stamps and start making the 50% who pay no federal taxes, start paying.
Dan Grant January 25, 2012 at 05:39 PM
Pete, the article was about Christie's call for a 10 percent reduction in the Income Tax and my comments wher on target in saying that it is not the problem. Maybe you say they aren't cogent because you are idealogically unsuited to understand them. No matter how you cut it Christie's programs have made it more expensive for property tax payers and that will continue until we reform property taxes themselves.
Roll Back Our Tax February 27, 2012 at 01:45 PM
In Hopatcong, the teachers didn't have enough fortitude to forfeit the 4.45% wage increase in the last year of their contract to increase state aid. Instead teachers got laid off & Hopatcong got less aid. http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/hopatcong-schools-to-get-760k-less-state-aid-than-in-2011 New forms of greed will arise w/new teacher's contract. Had to go to state for mediation. I predict 2-3% increases in wages. http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/hopatcong-teachers-strike-tenative-contract Hell our schools can't even score above state average in math and English skills. http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/high-school-test-scores-show-mixed-results-locally Yet we have the 3rd highest cost in Sussex county to educate a student ($17,040). At a time when we should be counting every penny, Mayor Petillo gave the borough employees 3% raises over next 3 years, the Superintendent doesn't want to close a school despite declining enrollment plus the School Board President and former Mayor Cliff Lundin doesn't want to start a Citizens Audit Committee despite rising out of control costs. The school budget will come up for vote again because they're over the 2% cap, we'll defeat it and once again the taxpayers get blamed. http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/hopatcong-school-budget-vote-elections-see-changes Don't need income tax relief. Too many seniors & disabled on fixed income. Looking at 8-10% increase in real estate taxes in Hopatcong!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »