.

Board of Education Learns the Art of 'Boardsmanship'

What the BOE did during its summer vacation

The past school year gave rise to a good bit of acrimony within the Parsippany-Troy Hills Board of Education. From the continuing controversy over Superintendent LeRoy Seitz's contract and employment status to disagreements over spending to apparent rivalries sprouting up between groups of members, getting things done efficiently is made more difficult. That's something Board President Frank Calabria wants to change for the 2011-12 school year.

Since his election as president, Calabria says he's worked to build unity within the body. He put aside bylaws to appoint two vice presidents, veteran member Dr. Frank Neglia and newly elected Susy Golderer. He delayed forming committees until July to force members to work together—in full view of the public—in making decisions. Calabria, ever the educator, even resorted to rearranging seat assignments at meetings.

This isn't about good guys and bad guys, he says.

"I genuinely like each and every member of this board," Calabria told Patch. "Each of them cares deeply about the students and the schools. And I believe, in time, they'll come together."

This summer, Calabria set up a special event to help with the process of uniting the board members. He called on the New Jersey School Boards Association to give the Parsippany BOE a seminar on what the president called "boardsmanship."

"School boards are supposed to work together as a unit," Calabria explained, adding that the seminar is one presented to every Board of Education at some point.

On June 28, at a special public board meeting, the primary agenda item featured Joanne Barr of the NJSBA and her Board Operations workshop.

Barr told the board and the residents in the audience that every action taken by a board of education must be guided by a Code of Ethics the association accepted in 1975. That agreement became law by an act of the state legislature in 2001.

"The Code of Ethics describes what you can do and can't do as board members," Barr said. 

Under the code, among other things, board members throughout the state must:

  • uphold all laws
  • make decisions based on the educational welfare of children
  • help to frame policies
  • take no personal or private actions that could compromise the board
  • hold school matters confidential
  • refuse to surrender independence to special interests or factionalization

"Your role is not to administer schools but, with all members together, to see that they are well run," Barr explained.
One area that falls under the ethics umbrella is nepotism in hiring and appointments, which is considered unethical. Another is conflicts of interest.

"If you have a personal involvement, you must recuse yourself. [During discussions], leave the room," said Barr. "In collective negotiations, you can't participate if you have an immediate family member such as siblings or parents involved."

She also reminded the nine school officials that they have no right to throw around their weight in schools.

"As board members, you have no power save for sitting in the meeting. As an individual, you have no other power," she said, underscoring that whatever power any board of education has exists only as a united group. "The person who has the last word in hiring is the superintendent. You cannot hire a person unless the superintendent recommends that person. You cannot fix a problem in a school—if there's a problem, call the superintendent."

But she added that the authority board members jointly share is meaningful, as is each individual member's vote on important issues for the district.

An example she offered dealt with a BOE member writing a letter to an editor. According to Barr, it is ethical for a member to do this as long as he or she states explicitly that the letter does not represent the views of the board. The only member by law who can speak for the body is its president, and he or she can do so only with board approval.

Barr urged the members to take their votes and the panel's duty to make policy seriously and to protect their own integrity.

"Refuse to surrender your independent vote to partisan political groups or to anyone," she said. 

Again, Barr hit on the subject of unity. The NJSBA requires that boards of education publicly speak with one voice and project an image of togetherness.

"You want everyone together," she aid. "You get many more things done."

Barr guided the board through an exercise in which she presented ethical dilemmas and members shared their opinion of whether or not actions taken were in keeping with the ethics code.

In one, the question posed involved a BOE negotiations committee chairperson who accepts a political endorsement from a teachers' association. Under the code, it is acceptable behavior for the chairperson to accept the endorsement. The chair, however, cannot negotiate with that union. 

Another question dealt with the part of the code that says board members must "support and protect school personnel." This means that if a member hears some complaint about a district employee, he or she must take the issue to the superintendent and must not speak of the matter publicly. If no administrative solution develops, then and only then may the member bring the issue before the public.

A corollary to this is that no board member must take any action or utter any statement that undermines their superintendent.
Barr said there is a good reason board members should keep their negative opinions and complaints to themselves and to the superintendent: People can be litigious.

"Say something negative and you could be sued," she warned. "If you adhere to the Code of Ethics, your legal bills will be paid through your insurance coverage."

Of course, if a board member sticks to the code, the only person who will hear his or her complaint is the superintendent.

The Code of Ethics also pertains to communications between members, who are not allowed to meet in small groups outside of the whole (save for approved committees dealing with particular subject areas). 

"Board members' notes, emails and text messages during a meeting can be requested by citizens who make Open Rublic Records Act requests. 

"Discussions outside of committee meetings and closed-door meetings involving confidential matters must take place as a full body within the public meeting," Barr said. "Every board member is entitled to a district email address. Be very careful about what you put in an email. And remember, board members can't 'reply all'; that would be considered an illegal meeting."

She noted that using 'reply all' in emails concerning board business is not an ethics violation, but is a violation of the sunshine law.

Penalties exist for board members who break the code. If someone is found guilty, the punishment goes from being reprimanded to being suspended or censured. Ultimately, the state ethics commission can opt to remove that member from the board permanently. 

The element that makes a board successful, said Barr, is trust.

"That's a tough one," said Co-Vice President Susy Golderer. "There are some members of this board that I do not trust."

A few other members nodded their heads.

"You've got to be able to trust your fellow board members. Each of you is important, and it's important to develop unity, shared values," said Barr. "One board member can hurt the entire board for three years on QSAC in the area of governance."

QSAC is the monitoring system used to evaluate the performances of boards  of education. There are five areas judged: 

  • Personnel
  • Instruction and programs
  • Operations
  • Fiscal management 
  • Governance

A score of 80 percent or higher shows a board is highly qualified. Between 50 and 80 percent indicates a need for corrective action. If a board scores less than 50 percent, the state Department of Education can come in to oversee the situation.

"You never want to see that happen," Barr said. "Those corrective action plans are really tough."

Superintendent Seitz, noting that Parsippany scored as "highly qualified" in its last evaluation, said those that fail QSAC do so because their board members don't adhere to the Code of Ethics.

"Really, it is all about ethics," said Barr.

Following the session, board members appeared to be satisfied with what they heard.

"[Barr] had a lot of interesting things to say," said Golderer. "She's given me a lot to think about."

Board member Fran Orthwein gave thumbs-up to the session and to Barr.

"If everyone listens to what she said, we will be successful as a board," she said.

President Calabria agreed.

"This is a fine board made up of people I truly respect," he said. "Sure, we've had our moments, but I know the board is slowly but surely coming together. 

"I have no doubt that [2011-12] will be a great year for the board and for the district."

steve revette September 02, 2011 at 11:35 AM
That's not right. That's not a code that is just plain stupid.nother question dealt with the part of the code that says board members must "support and protect school personnel." This means that if a member hears some complaint about a district employee, he or she must take the issue to the superintendent and must not speak of the matter publicly": That is just plain ridiculous!!!!! The public has a right to know!!!!!
Hank Heller September 02, 2011 at 11:43 AM
This is a good start, but the State's Code of Ethics law needs to be updated because at least in the case of "nepotism" the State does not consider it "nepotism" and demand recusal if the employee relationship is that of cousin or child of the sitting board member and does not live in the same domecile as the board member. This is clearly a definition of "convenience" for the BOE and State and is illusory at best. It certainly does not smack of transparency nor integrity. This needs to be changed for the benefit of all parties, public, Board Member and employee alike. Hank Heller
Natalie Davis (Editor) September 02, 2011 at 01:23 PM
Steve, I am not defending or deriding the code, but personnel matters are confidential, that's why it says you can't have people speaking publicly about those sorts of matters. What if the complaint is an untrue or unfair one?
steve revette September 02, 2011 at 04:21 PM
I understand Natalie but at the same time what if the complaint is true. I mean in any district but Parsippany I would give it some doubt. They say you should takin an issue to the superintendent. However, the way the superintendent responds to dealing with the issue is by just putting off. Trust me, I of all people know that.
Matt Clarkin September 02, 2011 at 07:20 PM
I have to agree with Steve to an extent. While it should be brought to the Superintendent first, the board member should at least be able to bring it to closed session to try to alleviate the situation if the Superintendent doesn't respond appropriately. The board should be empowered to deal with those sorts of situations, even if it must be done privately. The Superintendent works for the board; the board's job is to make sure "the schools are well run". The board should ALWAYS be able to overrule the Superintendent if they feel he ever made the wrong decision. How can you make sure the schools are well run without the ability to change bad decisions?
steve revette September 02, 2011 at 08:49 PM
Not to mention trust? I mean to be honest I think trust could be bad for the board and for the public SOMETIMES. When you don't trust somebody you keep your guard up against them. Plus make decisions based only on the superintendent's recommendation? As board members, you have no power save for sitting in the meeting. As an individual, you have no other power," she said, underscoring that whatever power any board of education has exists only as a united group. Please tell that to Anthony Mancuso.
singing09 September 04, 2011 at 12:36 PM
"Calabria ever the educator".. wow, I am truly impressed by this article.... Calabria should know a few things regarding nepotism... the last I checked, he has two daughters and a daughter-in-law employed in the district...you tell me that this guy is to be trusted? whom are we kidding? by the way, what has happened with Seitz's contract since it has been rescinded? Has he accepted the new one offered to him by the board? Has Seitz given back the "money" he illegally earned while the bs contract was in "effect"? I am asking why all this silence about it...why this is not making news anymore?
Natalie Davis (Editor) September 04, 2011 at 01:54 PM
Singing09, that story is nowhere near done. Just give it time. Calabria ever the educator... I'm a former teacher's wife who has spent a bit of time in front of classrooms herself. I was referring to his move to keep the peace by changing seating assignments. C'mon, isn't that exactly what a textbook teacher would do? As for trusting him or anyone, I'm not telling you to do that. You get to decide who is trustworthy or not.
Hank Heller September 04, 2011 at 04:19 PM
I am eager to know if all members of the Parsippany Board of Ed filled out their Background Check Questionaires and submitted it to the required authorities. That will be a good beginning indicator of Dr. Calabria's intentions as he works to lead this BOE into a better, more stable future. I want to believe in Dr. Calabria, since I like him. However, only his leadership, direction and management skills will earn him our ultimate respect. If this BOE under Dr. Calabria's leadership only deals with the rules and laws that are convenient for them and continues to accomodate themselves and the Administration, as past Parsippany BOE's have done, we will be in for another year of failures. Hank Heller
steve revette September 04, 2011 at 08:07 PM
I think Dr. Calabria is dong a great job as President. What I'm saying I find it wierd that they say you only have power when your united but Anthony was doing things unilaterally. They did not vote to Ban Pat from a meeting. That was done solely by Anthony. Like I said before anybody taking their issues to Seitz is a bad idea not just a boardmember. Trust me. The way Seitz deals with issues is by keep putting them off and off. The fact of the matter is he won't do a thing 90 percent of the time. I suggest anybody who has an issue and plans on bringing it to Seitz. You be on him about it otherwise he'll make terrible excuse. I'm sure their are hundreds of parents who will agree with me on this.
singing09 September 05, 2011 at 04:19 AM
Natalie, Obviously you misunderstood my comment.. I quoted your comment and used it to allude sarcastically why he is such a great "educator"... being in the business himself for many years, he can navigate the waters like an expert sailor and "personally knows" where to steer the ship.... where he want it to go.... basically, at his own shore, where it is more convenient for him and his family. I do not trust his judgement nor his intellect. I have seen him in action-or I should say -inaction- to think otherwise of him.
singing09 September 05, 2011 at 04:21 AM
Good luck with that Hank!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »