.

School Board Cleared in Wrongful Termination Case

Jury finds former bus repair vendor liable in case, but judge overturns that decision.

The earned a victory Thursday—and it was a close call for former bus mechanic Michael Strumolo—in an .

By a unanimous 6-0 vote Thursday, a Morris County Superior Court jury ruled the school board's decision to not renew the contract of former district transportation director Kathleen Warrick was legitimate. That same jury, however, found Strumolo liable for allegedly trying to convince the BOE to give Warrick the boot.

Judge Donald S. Coburn immediately reversed the jury's ruling against Strumolo, wiping away any alleged liability against the garage owner.

Neither Warrick nor her attorney, Jon Green, responded to Patch's request for comment. No announcement has been made as to whether an appeal will take place.

Warrick, who supervised district transportation for three years, contended that the board fired her in 2008 only because she had a hand in ending Michael Strumolo and Hiawatha Towing's 35-year-long contract to service Parsippany school buses. She accused Strumolo and his company—named in a separate, simultaneous action—of manipulating the board to have her fired as retaliation.

Those offering testimony for the board, among them Superintendent of Schools LeRoy Seitz, BOE member Anthony Mancuso, former member Dr. Louis Valori and , said Warrick's employment contract was not renewed for cause. They noted a number of incidents including two in which Warrick reportedly could not be located when needed during bus emergency situations.

Several things were constant in testimony given: Strumolo and Warrick shared a hostile work relationship, Warrick was convinced that Strumolo was not up to the job of servicing the district's buses and Strumolo repeatedly complained about Warrick.

The mechanic, who won his own BOE seat in 2009 and now chairs the transportation committee, admitted that he complained "regularly" about Warrick, at one point asking from the witness stand, "Did I give up my right to express my opinion?"

After nearly a week of testimony and several hours of deliberation, the jury sided unanimously with the school board.

"Dr. Seitz had very legitimate reasons for why he did not recommend to the board the renewal of her contract," said Robert Francis Gold, the attorney representing the school board. "It was for cause. ... Proofs against the board just weren't there."

Anthony Mancuso said he believed Warrick's case against the school board was frivolous. 

"There was no connection between board members and the reason for the administration's termination of the employee," he told Patch. "When the facts came out, the jury saw that there was proper cause given as the reasons for termination. ... The administration and the board acted properly in its handling of this employee."

Superintendent Seitz agreed.

"From day one I knew the case against the district was groundless," he said. "The employee in question was terminated for just cause and not because of any comments made by Mr. Strumolo to people in town."

Seitz added the unanimous jury vote against Strumolo showed the panel must have believed that the record demonstrated that the former bus vendor "attempted to use his influence to have the district unjustly terminate an employee."

Attorney Gold said Judge Coburn's move to overturn the jury's finding against Strumolo was the right thing to do.

"There was not a shred of proof of malice," he explained. "Under New Jersey's Conscientious Employee Protection Act, you have to prove torturous interference motivated by malice and intentional wrongdoing. There was not a shred."

He added that he believes the jury misunderstood CEPA's requirements regarding malice and intent and perhaps put too much stock into the antipathy between Strumolo and Warrick.

"The fact that they didn't like one another is not really the issue," Gold said. "There was not any indication that Mr. Strumolo acted with reckless disregard for the truth or, with any intentional wrongdoing, tried to get her fired."

If the judge had allowed the jury's ruling against Strumolo to stand, the garage owner might have been liable for actual and punitive damages in the neighborhood of $1 million or more, according to Seitz and Mancuso.

Lawyer Walter Laufenberg, who represented Strumolo and Hiawatha Towing in the matter, did not respond to a request for comment.

For his part, Strumolo offered only a brief statement.

"I thank God Almighty that this frivolous lawsuit was dismissed." 

Carol M. July 15, 2012 at 02:10 PM
Mr Brown I am commenting on the fact that a jury found MR STRUMOLO GUILTY after listening to her case and you are correct that I do not know of Ms Warrick but, I am not commenting on her or her job performance in any way.. A jury is made up of members of our community who have pledged to have no bias regarding the information before them and they found in Ms Warrick's favor.which speaks to the validity of her claim against Mr Strumolo. The jury also found that the BOE was not guilty when they fired her so it would seem that the jury agreed with you that she did not do a good job when she was employed by the school district. I am in agreement with both decisions that came from the jury and wonder why you have chosen that only one of the two are correct? I don't feel that a judge should have a jury rule on a case and then set that ruling aside. If the people ruled that Mr. Strumolo is guilty then he is guilty; I'm tired of hearing about cases being dismissed on technicalities which ultimately seem to allow the guilty to go unpunished. If a technicality is enough to dismiss a case from the onset then so be it but to have our justice system go through all the motions and come to a verdict and then to set that aside after the fact when you don't agree with the jury's ruling is just wrong and I hope that Parsippany is paying attention.
VietNam Vet July 16, 2012 at 04:44 AM
Carol, I know Mr. Strumolo and he is an honorable man, if he did influence the board in anyway, then I think he did the taxpayers in Parsippany a favor. I have know this man for a nuber of years and he has nothing but the best in mind for the townspeople as do I. Its time we get rid of the people who were put in office because they knew the right people in the townhall. Mr. Strumolo doesn't owe anyone in this town anything and is beholding to no one.
Carol M. July 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM
Mr Brown I trust that you are sincere in your admiration for and affiliation with Mr Strumolo and as I mentioned, it seems that the jury agreed with you that Ms Warrick's discharge from the schools was warranted but to say that Mr Strumolo's actions with the BOE were OK when the jury clearly ruled that his actions were wrong is a bit of a contradiction wouldn't you say? My impression is that you might feel that the ends justified the means here but should we look the other way when our elected officials behalf badly just because we think the outcome may have benefited us? This isn't a situation were you or I may have formed an opinion based on some casual observance or conversation; this was a trial before an unbiased jury, and the jury concluded by unanimous vote that Mr. Strumolo was guilty and I trust that they were sincere in their verdict.
VietNam Vet July 21, 2012 at 05:51 AM
Carol, no matter what the jury says, the Judge still has the final word.
Carol M. July 21, 2012 at 02:09 PM
You are correct Mr Brown, but that was what frustrated me from the beginning. Why did the judge bother with a jury in the first place and what is the point of having a jury if the judge is going to set aside their ruling? I know that you and I can't really come up with the answers to these questions but it still doesn't make the way the outcome was determined go away. I appreciate the exchange of perspective we've had here and you are right, I just have to live with that the judge had the final word.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »